Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Degeneracy direction — where it appears

The combination of parameters that a data set leaves unconstrained, along which the error ellipse is long and thin. Two measurements with different degeneracy directions break each other's degeneracy when combined.

Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

w = −0.9 is 34 millimagnitudes, and one supernova scatters by 120. Above: how much the distance modulus moves when the dark energy is not a constant. Each curve is a universe with the same Ωₘ = 0.315 and a different equation of state w, drawn as a difference from w = −1 in magnitudes. At redshift a half, w = −0.9 is worth 34 millimagnitudes — the shaded band is the 0.12-magnitude intrinsic scatter of a single standardised type Ia supernova, and the signal is a fifth of it. Nothing about one object can see this; the measurement is the mean of 1500, whose error on the mean is 3.1 millimagnitudes, and even that only works because the shape of the curve in redshift is different from every systematic anybody has thought of. Below: why the supernovae are not enough on their own. Each locus is the set of (Ωₘ, w) that a measurement cannot tell apart from the fiducial model — computed, not sketched: the supernova curve is the ridge of the same sum of squares a fit would minimise over 0.02–1 in redshift, and the acoustic-scale curve is the exact set of models with the same comoving distance to last scattering, which is what fixes the angle the microwave background's first peak subtends. They cross at 36 degrees. Neither is a measurement of w and the pair is, which is why the constraint on the equation of state is a picture of two loci crossing rather than a number read off a curve — and why −1.03 ± 0.03 is a statement about how well they cross rather than about how well anything was measured.

The number that would say whether it is a constant

Whether dark energy is a cosmological constant is the question of whether w is exactly −1, and w = −0.9 changes a distance modulus by thirty-four millimagnitudes at redshift a half — a fifth of the scatter of a single supernova, along a degeneracy only the acoustic scale can cut across.

cosmology · Dark energy Three fits of the dark energy's equation of state, and the line they all cross. The equation of state w of the dark energy against redshift, for the three combined fits published with the second year of acoustic-scale data from the largest spectroscopic galaxy survey — the same galaxy and microwave-background data with three different supernova compilations — each written as w = w₀ + wₐ z/(1 + z). A cosmological constant is the horizontal line at −1. All three fits have w above −1 today (between −0.84 and −0.67) and below it in the past, and they cross it at redshift 0.35, 0.44, 0.41. Below −1 lies the phantom region, where a density grows as the universe expands; a single field with ordinary kinetic energy can be on either side of the line but cannot cross it. The preference for these fits over a constant is quoted at 2.8, 3.8 and 4.2 standard deviations, and the only thing that differs between the three is the supernovae.

A crossing that may belong to the fitting form

Allow the dark energy's equation of state to change and three independent fits say it has: above −1 today, below it before redshift half. The data hold w well at one redshift only, a line crossed from below is one no single field can cross, and a straight line in the scale factor fitted to a curved history crosses it anyway.

cosmology · Dark energy Where solved fields land in the plane the surveys fit. The w₀–wₐ plane, with the cross at a cosmological constant. Each small point is the best two-parameter description, through the same mock survey as the earlier figures, of a scalar field solved from its own equation: four thawing potentials at seven values of w₀ from −0.97 to −0.62, and freezing trackers on inverse-power potentials with exponents from a quarter to two. The thawing fields all land on one line through the constant, wₐ ≈ −1.49(1 + w₀), with no point more than 0.08 from it; the freezing fields land on the other side, with wₐ positive. The three published fits (larger points, with their quoted errors) lie below the thawing line by −0.38, −0.59, −0.49 in wₐ: steeper than any thawing field with their present value would be. The diagonal is w₀ + wₐ = −1. The thawing line is steeper than it, so every thawing field is fitted as having crossed −1 — but early: these fits cross between redshift 1.7 and 3.3, where a line through the constant with this slope must, near z = 1/(1.49 − 1) = 2.0. The published fits cross near redshift 0.4.

Every thawing field falls on one line

A scalar field that is the dark energy sits still while the universe expands quickly, and begins to roll only when the expansion has slowed to the field's own mass. Solve the field instead of fitting a line to it, and four quite different potentials give one history and one line through the plane the surveys fit — a line the published fits do not sit on.

cosmology · Dark energy

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Cosmological constantEquation of stateQuintessenceAcoustic scaleDark energyFigure of meritPhantom energyPhotometric calibrationBig crunchDark energy densityDeceleration parameterHubble friction

All concepts