Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Depth

Series

A field says what an essay is about. A series follows one idea essay by essay — from the question that introduces it to the one that assumes all the others.
Distance modulus against redshift, for three universes. The distance modulus μ = 5 log₁₀(D_L/10 pc) against redshift for three universes, all with H₀ = 67.36 km/s/Mpc, with 60 model supernovae drawn from the ΛCDM curve with 0.15 magnitudes of scatter. The point of the figure is how little difference there is: across two decades of redshift the three curves stay within a few tenths of a magnitude, and at z = 0.5 the accelerating and decelerating cases differ by 0.387 mag. A cosmology is not read off this plot. It is read off the residual, which is the next figure.

Dark energy

  1. 1 An expansion that was supposed to be slowing
  2. 2 The number that would say whether it is a constant
  3. 3 A residual that is somebody else's velocity
  4. 4 A crossing that may belong to the fitting form
  5. 5 Every thawing field falls on one line
  6. +3 more
8 essays · cosmology What each method can see. Planet mass against orbital distance, both logarithmic, with the detection threshold of each method drawn as the boundary it actually is. Radial velocity at 1 m/s needs mass rising as √a; astrometry at 20 µas needs it falling as 1/a, which is the only method that gets easier further out; a 100 ppm transit is a threshold on radius and so a horizontal line at about 1.4 Earth masses, cut off at 1.21 AU by the need for three transits in 4 years; direct imaging begins outside the diffraction limit, 0.6 AU at 10 parsecs for a 39 m aperture at 10 µm. The solar system is drawn on top: for two decades every one of its planets except Jupiter lay outside every region, which is the whole of what the early census was measuring.

Detection bias

  1. 1 Every survey draws a different sky
  2. 2 The threshold that is not a threshold
  3. 3 Every method prefers a circle, and not for the same reason
  4. 4 How many planets a star has is not a measurement
  5. 5 The Earth-sized bin is where diluted planets land
  6. +3 more
8 essays · exoplanets A slice 1,000 megaparsecs across. 872 galaxies in a wedge 1000 comoving megaparsecs deep, generated as a Thomas process — Poisson centres at 0.00012 per square megaparsec, 13 galaxies each on average, scattered about their centre with a Gaussian of 22 Mpc. That is not a simulation of how structure formed and does not pretend to be; it is the simplest clustered process whose correlation function is known exactly, which is what lets the next figure check a measurement against something rather than against itself. What it does reproduce is the impression: at this scale the distribution is obviously not uniform, there are groups and there are gaps, and the eye finds patterns in it readily — including several that are not there, because the eye finds patterns in a Poisson field too. The question the next two figures ask is the only one that settles it: at what separation does the clustering stop, and is there a scale above which a box of this universe looks like any other box?

Large-scale structure

  1. 1 Homogeneous above a hundred megaparsecs
  2. 2 A map that is not of positions
  3. 3 A map stretched by the thing it measures
  4. 4 An emptiness that expands faster
  5. 5 Velocities that see past the edge of the map
  6. +3 more
8 essays · cosmology Every shell contributes the same. Concentric shells of equal thickness around an observer, with stars scattered uniformly in volume. The number of stars in a shell grows as its radius squared and the flux from each falls as the radius squared, so the two cancel exactly and every shell delivers the same total light — the drawn counts are 6, 15, 31, 55, 88, in proportion to r³ − r₀³, and the drawn sizes fall as 1/r. That cancellation is the paradox, and it is why no amount of dust helps: dust absorbs the light and then re-radiates it, and in a universe old enough for the sum to converge it would come to the same temperature as the stars. The sum diverges linearly with radius, so something has to stop it — and the only two candidates are that the shells eventually overlap, or that there are no shells beyond a certain distance because there has not been time for their light to arrive.

Olbers's paradox

  1. 1 Why the sky is dark
  2. 2 The darkness has a number in it
  3. 3 A background weighed by what it stops
  4. 4 Two skies where the paradox comes out right
  5. 5 A background that stops breaking into sources
  6. +3 more
8 essays · cosmology What 28.5° of plane change costs, at three orbital speeds. The cost of rotating an orbital plane, 2v sin(Δi/2), against the angle turned, for the three speeds a transfer to geostationary orbit passes through: 7.669 km/s in a 400 km circular orbit, 3.075 km/s once circular at 42,164 km, and 1.618 km/s at the apogee of the ellipse between them. All three are √(μ/r) or vis-viva at μ⊕ = 398,600 km³/s². A 28.5° turn therefore costs 3.775, 1.514 or 0.797 km/s depending only on where it is done — the apogee figure is 21% of the low one, and that fraction is the speed ratio, so it is the same at every angle. Past 23.9° a turn in the low orbit costs more than the 3.176 km/s that leaves Earth from it, and a full reversal costs 2v = 15.34 km/s, 4.8 times the escape burn.

Plane change

  1. 1 The cheapest place to turn
  2. 2 A rotation split between two burns
  3. 3 Flying further away in order to turn
  4. 4 A plane change paid at the worst speed there is
  5. 5 A plane change borrowed from the Moon
  6. +3 more
8 essays · spaceflight How much of a rocket has to be propellant. Propellant fraction against the velocity change bought, for three real propellant combinations. The curves approach 1 and cannot reach it, so every extra kilometre per second costs a larger share of what remains — which is why staging exists.

Rocket equation

  1. 1 The exponential that decides what can be flown
  2. 2 The stage that has to be thrown away
  3. 3 The split that is not an equal split
  4. 4 Choosing a propellant is choosing a molecular weight
  5. 5 Orbit costs 7.8 and a launch buys 9.4
  6. +3 more
8 essays · spaceflight A transit that will not keep time. Transit times of a planet of 8 Earth masses on a 3-day orbit, minus the best straight line through them, from a three-body integration in which the second planet at 4.62 days is the only thing perturbing it. The residual swings by ±1.7 minutes and repeats over 58 days — the super-period 1/|3/P₂ − 2/P₁|, which is long precisely because the pair is near the 3:2 resonance and gets longer the nearer it is. The amplitude is proportional to the perturbing planet's mass, so fitting this curve weighs a planet that may never transit at all. The short jagged component is not noise: it is the chopping signal, one kick per conjunction at the 8.6-day synodic period, sampled once every 3 days by the transits themselves and so barely above the rate at which it can be followed. The integration conserved energy to 1.6e-10.

Transit timing

  1. 1 Planets found by a transit running late
  2. 2 A mass that is only a mass once the eccentricity is known
  3. 3 A forecast that fails on a schedule
  4. 4 A transit late by the width of an orbit
  5. 5 One timing curve and five planets that could draw it
  6. +3 more
8 essays · exoplanets Mars through 8.3 months of sky. The geocentric ecliptic longitude and latitude of Mars over 252 days — 8.3 months — centred on opposition, computed as the direction of P − E with both orbits taken as circles: the Earth's of radius 1 AU, the planet's of 1.5237 AU inclined 1.850°. The motion reverses for 72.7 days and backs up 15.94° of longitude, and that interval is centred on opposition to within 0.0000° of longitude. The track closes on itself: over 149 days the planet visits the same point of the sky twice, and the loop it encloses is 15.9° long and 2.94° tall. Longitude and latitude are at different scales: a degree of latitude is drawn 4.6 times a degree of longitude, because the sweep of 51° in longitude and 4.5° in latitude will not share a scale on one page. Circular orbits mean one loop for every apparition, and that is the real cost of this figure: Mars is 0.525 AU away at the opposition drawn here, its true distance at opposition varies with its eccentricity, and the real loops differ in size from one apparition to the next because of it. The marks are 20 days apart, and they crowd where the motion stops.

Apparent motion

  1. 1 The loop a planet does not make
  2. 2 The solar system measured from inside one orbit
  3. 3 A right angle short by a seventh of a degree
  4. 4 A triangle of meetings that turns in eight centuries
  5. 5 Brightest as a crescent, and not as a disc
  6. +2 more
7 essays · sky Five rules, and how fast each one leaves the seasons behind. The accumulated difference between a calendar and the seasons, for five leap-year rules, over 4000 years. Each is a straight line whose slope is the rule's fraction minus the tropical year's 0.2421897, and nothing else about a calendar matters to this plot — not which months are long, not where the year starts, not what anything is called. The Julian quarter is out by 11.25 minutes a year, which is one day every 128 years and is why ten days had to be removed in 1582. The Gregorian rule takes 3223 years to lose a day and the Persian 4264, in the other direction — the older rule is the better one, at a denominator of 33 against 400. The 128-year rule is level on this scale: 454545 years to a day, which is longer than any calendar has been kept — and it is not a separate invention but the Julian rule with its own error subtracted, since 1/4 − 1/128 = 31/128 exactly and the Julian drift is exactly one day per 128 years. What the figure cannot show is that the tropical year is itself shortening, by about half a second a century, so the slopes drawn here are the ones at the present epoch and every line is very slightly curved.

Calendars

  1. 1 A year that is not a whole number of days
  2. 2 A month that has to be tabulated
  3. 3 A full moon computed from the year number
  4. 4 A month that begins when someone sees it
  5. 5 A day longer than the year
  6. +2 more
7 essays · sky The equation of time, and its two causes. The difference between a sundial and a clock over the year, in minutes, computed from Kepler's equation and the tilt. The eccentricity term has one cycle a year and the obliquity term has two; their sum runs from −14.2 to 16.4 minutes.

Equation of time

  1. 1 The Sun is a bad clock, by up to sixteen minutes
  2. 2 Two fictitious suns in sequence
  3. 3 The earliest sunset is not the shortest day
  4. 4 On Mars the orbit outweighs the tilt
  5. 5 A Sun that stops and runs backwards
  6. +2 more
7 essays · sky A radius that depends on the colour it is measured in. Transit depth against wavelength for a planet of 1.38 Jupiter radii at 1400 K, whose atmosphere has a scale height of 538 km — computed from H = kT/µg, not assumed. One scale height of extra opacity adds 153 parts per million to a transit of 1.40 per cent, so the whole spectral signal is 862 ppm at its strongest: one part in 16 of the transit that carries it. The features are at real band centres — sodium at 0.589 µm, water at 1.4 µm, carbon dioxide at 4.3 µm — with the rise at the blue end the Rayleigh slope of scattering off the smallest particles.

Exoplanet atmospheres

  1. 1 A radius that depends on the colour it is measured in
  2. 2 The planet is seen when it disappears
  3. 3 A spectrum flattened by cloud, or by nothing
  4. 4 Molecules seen only through a change of temperature
  5. 5 A day side as hot as bare rock
  6. +2 more
7 essays · exoplanets The same recession law from two different galaxies. Twenty galaxies at fixed comoving positions after the whole picture has been multiplied by 1.34, with each galaxy's displacement drawn from where it was to where it is. Every arrow's tail sits at the old separation and its tip at the new one, so the arrow is exactly 0.34 times its tail's distance from the highlighted galaxy — proportional to separation for one reason and no other: a uniform scaling moves everything in proportion to its distance from whatever point the scaling is measured about. The right-hand panel measures from a different galaxy and gets the identical law with the identical constant. That is the content of a linear velocity–distance relation. It is the signature of an expansion with no centre, and the observation that every galaxy recedes is therefore not evidence that this one is the centre — it is evidence that none of them is.

Expansion

  1. 1 The shift that is not a Doppler shift
  2. 2 A redshift that changes while it is watched
  3. 3 An orbit feels the acceleration and never the rate
  4. 4 The age of the universe weighs the Local Group
  5. 5 The Sun's speed counted in quasars comes out twice too large
  6. +2 more
7 essays · cosmology three revolutions, on a turning Earth. The ground track of a circular orbit at 420 km and 51.64° inclination, over 3 revolutions, on an equirectangular graticule. The latitude is a sine wave bounded by ±51.64° exactly — sin φ = sin i sin u, so the inclination is the highest latitude the orbit ever passes over, and it is reached twice per revolution. Each successive pass is displaced west by (ω⊕ − Ω̇) × 92.90 min = 23.61°, of which 0.32° is the orbital plane's own regression and the rest is the planet turning underneath: the vehicle comes back to nearly the same place in inertial space and the place has moved. The period used is the nodal one, 92.899 min against the Keplerian 92.970: J₂ makes the two differ by 4.31 s, which is 0.018° of walk per revolution and 102° in a year — the difference between a repeat track and a track that used to repeat. The map is equirectangular and therefore wrong about area everywhere; what it is right about is longitude difference, which is the whole of what this figure measures.

Ground tracks

  1. 1 The line under a satellite
  2. 2 A swath is sized at the equator
  3. 3 The circle a station can see
  4. 4 A stationary satellite that draws a figure of eight
  5. 5 Five satellites and not four
  6. +2 more
7 essays · spaceflight Four expansion histories that agree exactly today. The scale factor against time, with the present at zero and every model normalised to a = 1 and an expansion rate of 67.36 km/s/Mpc there. That normalisation is the figure: four universes that are indistinguishable from a measurement made now, separated entirely by what is behind and ahead of them. Each curve is integrated from da/dt = aH₀E(a) rather than from its own closed form, so the four are compared through one routine. The age each implies is where its curve meets zero: empty (Ω = 0) 14.52 Gyr, matter only (Ω = 1) 9.68 Gyr, ΛCDM (Planck 2018) 13.80 Gyr, closed (Ω = 2) 8.29 Gyr. The empty universe's 14.52 Gyr is the Hubble time 1/H₀ exactly, which is what makes it the natural thing to measure an acceleration against. The closed model turns over and is stopped at its turnaround.

Hubble constant

  1. 1 One number that is an age, a size and a density
  2. 2 The same constant, measured twice, five sigma apart
  3. 3 A constant that is an angle divided by a length
  4. 4 A ruler shortened by something already gone
  5. 5 An edge that needs no pulsation
  6. +2 more
7 essays · cosmology One length, leaving and returning. The comoving Hubble radius c/aH against the scale factor, both logarithmic. Everything to the right of the kink is exact and is the same cosmology as every other figure here: after inflation the comoving Hubble radius grows, as a in the radiation era and as √a in the matter era, then turns over once Λ takes hold. Everything to the left is a schematic — the energy scale of inflation is unmeasured, so neither the height of the plateau nor the 62 e-folds drawn is a number anybody has — but the shape is not negotiable: in any accelerated expansion H is nearly constant, so c/aH falls as 1/a. The consequence is the mechanism. The solid horizontal line is a fixed comoving length of 209 Mpc: it starts inside the Hubble radius, is carried outside during inflation, sits frozen while nothing can act across it, and re-enters at z = 1090, which is last scattering — it is the scale the first acoustic peak is made of. The dashed line above it is the comoving size of the whole observable universe, 14148 Mpc, and the figure's quiet second finding is that it is still outside the Hubble radius: the very largest angular scales in the microwave background have never re-entered, which is why they show the primordial spectrum with no acoustic processing on it at all. One crossing does two jobs: it makes the sky uniform, because everything now visible was once in causal contact, and it makes it not quite uniform, because a quantum fluctuation stretched beyond the horizon has nothing left that can smooth it out.

Inflation

  1. 1 Two coincidences with one mechanism
  2. 2 The tilt knows the slope and not the height
  3. 3 A ratio that is an energy and a distance
  4. 4 The epoch nobody saw moves the tilt
  5. 5 A test that can only fail one way
  6. +2 more
7 essays · cosmology A boundary that a sixty-fourfold gust moves by a factor of two. The standoff distance of a dipole magnetosphere against a wind, in planetary radii, against the wind's proton density, for three wind speeds. The boundary sits where magnetic pressure equals ram pressure — the only balance available, since the field exerts no force on neutral gas and the wind touches nothing. Because a dipole falls as the cube of distance its pressure falls as the sixth power, so the standoff goes as the ram pressure to the −1/6: at 450 km/s a density of 6 per cubic centimetre puts the nose at 9.3 radii — against a measured average of ten to eleven — and a sixty-fourfold compression moves it only to 4.7. That exponent is the reason a magnetosphere is a stable thing to have. It is also the reason the boundary's position is a poor measurement of the field: a factor of two in the distance is a factor of sixty-four in what caused it, so the standoff measures the wind badly and the planet's moment hardly at all.

Magnetosphere

  1. 1 A boundary that hardly moves
  2. 2 An aurora that is a sixth root inside an arcsine
  3. 3 A substorm timed by webers and volts
  4. 4 A storm weighed by a compass needle
  5. 5 A planet that borrows the wind's field
  6. +2 more
7 essays · sky A magnification, and a spike inside it. The brightness of a background star as a foreground one passes in front of it. The smooth curve is exact: a point mass magnifies a point source by (u² + 2)/(u√(u² + 4)), which peaks at 6.7 for this track. The spike is the planet, of mass ratio 0.001, lensing one of the two images. Its duration is the Einstein time scaled by √q — about 23 hours against 30 days — so the whole planetary signal is a few hours in an event lasting a month, and it never repeats. The deviation is drawn in the approximation that the planet lenses the image in isolation; a real caustic crossing has structure this smooths over, and its true height is set by the source's size rather than by the geometry.

Microlensing

  1. 1 A star magnified by a planet nobody will see again
  2. 2 A light curve with a fold in it
  3. 3 An asymmetry that the Earth's own orbit puts in
  4. 4 A centroid that moves when the brightness does not
  5. 5 An event of a few hours and no host
  6. +2 more
7 essays · exoplanets A blackbody at 2.7255 kelvin, filling the sky. The Planck function at 2.7255 K in the units the measurement is reported in, with the peak marked where Wien's law in frequency puts it: x = hν/kT = 2.8214, so ν = 160.2 GHz and the intensity there is 384 MJy per steradian. The points are drawn at the twenty-one frequencies across the FIRAS band, displaced from the curve by a Gaussian of 50 parts per million of the peak, which is the root-mean-square deviation the instrument actually reported. At the scale of this plot that displacement is a fifth of a pixel and the points sit on the line — which is the entire finding. Nothing else in astronomy is a blackbody to a part in twenty thousand: a stellar spectrum is a blackbody with absorption lines cut into it and a continuum that is the wrong shape at both ends. A thermal spectrum this exact requires that the radiation was once in equilibrium with matter, which requires that the universe was once opaque, which requires that it was once hot and dense.

Microwave background

  1. 1 The most perfect blackbody ever measured
  2. 2 A standing wave frozen at one instant
  3. 3 The surface the background actually is
  4. 4 A blur that measures a depth
  5. 5 A dipole a hundred times the signal
  6. +2 more
7 essays · cosmology Four abundances, one free parameter. The abundances big-bang nucleosynthesis predicts, against the one number it is free to choose: η₁₀, the ratio of baryons to photons in units of 10⁻¹⁰. Four curves spanning nine decades, from a helium mass fraction of about a quarter down to a lithium abundance of one atom in ten billion, and they are not four independent predictions — they all come out of the same reaction network run at the same density. The horizontal bands are what is measured in the sky, each at its published one sigma. The measurement that matters is deuterium, because its curve is the steep one: inverting the drawn curve at D/H = 2.527e-5 gives η₁₀ = 6.11, and the ends of the observed interval give 6.06 to 6.15. The vertical band is what the microwave background gives, 6.13 ± 0.04, from the height of the second acoustic peak relative to the first. Those two agree to 0.4 per cent, and they have nothing whatever in common: one is a nuclear-reaction network run in the first three minutes and read off a quasar absorption line, the other is a fluid oscillation at four hundred thousand years read off a sky map. Lithium is the exception and it is not a small one — the network predicts 4.70e-10 at the microwave background's density and the halo stars show 1.60e-10, a factor of 2.9 too much, which is unresolved.

Nucleosynthesis

  1. 1 Four abundances and one free parameter
  2. 2 A particle count taken from a dwarf galaxy
  3. 3 The residue that failed to burn
  4. 4 A factor of three, and the flatness that prices every cure
  5. 5 An abundance with no direction to correct in
  6. +2 more
7 essays · cosmology A gap where planets should be. The number of planets per star per interval of log radius, for orbital periods under a hundred days, corrected for detection efficiency. There are two peaks — super-Earths near 1.3 R⊕ and sub-Neptunes near 2.4 R⊕ — and a deficit between them at 1.89 R⊕, where the occurrence falls to 33% of the peak. The gap is not a gap in what can be detected: detection efficiency rises smoothly through it, so a smooth underlying distribution could not produce a dip there.

Occurrence rates

  1. 1 The planets that were not seen
  2. 2 The part of a rate that is a definition
  3. 3 A threshold that makes iron matter only to giants
  4. 4 More small planets round smaller stars
  5. 5 At a year, most candidates are noise
  6. +2 more
7 essays · exoplanets

All essays