Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Series

Exoplanet atmospheres — the series

7 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. A radius that depends on the colour it is measured in. Transit depth against wavelength for a planet of 1.38 Jupiter radii at 1400 K, whose atmosphere has a scale height of 538 km — computed from H = kT/µg, not assumed. One scale height of extra opacity adds 153 parts per million to a transit of 1.40 per cent, so the whole spectral signal is 862 ppm at its strongest: one part in 16 of the transit that carries it. The features are at real band centres — sodium at 0.589 µm, water at 1.4 µm, carbon dioxide at 4.3 µm — with the rise at the blue end the Rayleigh slope of scattering off the smallest particles.

    A radius that depends on the colour it is measured in

    Measure a transit in one colour and then another, and the planet is a different size. The difference is a few atmospheric scale heights, which is a few hundred parts per million of an already tiny signal.

    part 1 · exoplanets
  2. One whole orbit. The system's total brightness through one orbit: the transit at phase 0, the slow rise and fall of the planet's illuminated hemisphere between, and the secondary eclipse at phase 0.5 where the planet's own light is removed. The transit is 1.05%; the secondary eclipse is 1800 ppm, about 6 times shallower.

    The planet is seen when it disappears

    Half an orbit after the transit the planet passes behind its star, and the light that vanishes is the planet's own. Subtracting two brightnesses taken hours apart isolates a body nothing has ever resolved.

    part 2 · exoplanets
  3. Three planets that are the same spectrum. A model transmission spectrum, in scale heights of apparent radius, drawn three times: once as it is, once with the reference radius raised by 0.45 scale heights and the abundance reduced to compensate, and once with a cloud deck truncating the features. The three differ by 0.21 scale heights root-mean-square against features of 2.1, which is well inside the error bars of any real observation. The reason is structural rather than observational: a transmission spectrum measures a difference in apparent radius with wavelength and never an absolute radius, so the level is a free parameter, and shifting the level trades against the abundance almost exactly. Adding a cloud deck adds a third parameter that flattens features and trades against both. Three unknowns and one curve is why the quoted abundance uncertainties from transmission spectroscopy are so much larger than the photometric precision suggests.

    A spectrum flattened by cloud, or by nothing

    A transmission spectrum measures how a planet's apparent radius changes with wavelength, and never the radius itself. That missing level is a free parameter, it trades almost exactly against the abundance of whatever is absorbing, and a cloud deck adds a third unknown to a curve that constrains two.

    part 3 · exoplanets
  4. Brightness temperature across the infrared, for three profiles. The brightness temperature of the planet's emission against wavelength from 1 to 12 microns, for the three temperature profiles, with water and carbon monoxide bands in the opacity. In a band the opacity is high, so the light comes from higher, lower-pressure layers; in the windows between bands it comes from deeper. Over a profile falling outward the bands are cooler than the windows: at 6.3 microns 1457 K against 1570 K at 3.6. Over the inverted profile they are hotter: 1851 against 1538. Over the isothermal profile every wavelength has the same brightness temperature and the spectrum is a blackbody, whatever molecules are present.

    Molecules seen only through a change of temperature

    The heat a planet gives off, measured colour by colour as it disappears behind its star, carries the fingerprints of the molecules in its atmosphere — but only because the atmosphere's temperature changes with height. Water absorbs where the air cools upward and emits where it warms, and in an atmosphere at one temperature every molecule vanishes from the spectrum, however much of it there is. An emission spectrum is a sounding of a temperature gradient, and the molecules are what it is taken with.

    part 4 · exoplanets
  5. Four rocky planets against the bare-rock limit: TRAPPIST-1b at 0.99, TRAPPIST-1c at 0.87, LHS 3844b at 1.01, GJ 367b at 0.99. Published day-side brightness temperatures of four small planets orbiting M dwarfs, each divided by the temperature its day side would have as dark bare rock re-radiating where it absorbs (dot, with its uncertainty), with the value for heat spread evenly over the whole planet marked for comparison (grey tick, at 0.71). TRAPPIST-1b: 503 ± 26 K against a bare-rock 508 K; TRAPPIST-1c: 380 ± 31 K against a bare-rock 434 K; LHS 3844b: 1040 ± 40 K against a bare-rock 1031 K; GJ 367b: 1728 ± 90 K against a bare-rock 1741 K. Three sit at the bare-rock limit within their errors, which leaves room for no thick atmosphere on dark rock. TRAPPIST-1c sits about one in eight below it, which a thin atmosphere could explain, and so could a moderately reflective surface. None comes near the even-redistribution value that a thick atmosphere would give.

    A day side as hot as bare rock

    A planet with no air can be no hotter on its day side than bare rock that re-radiates every photon where it lands. An atmosphere carries some of that heat to the night side, so the day side comes out cooler. For a rocky planet too small for its spectrum to be read, that difference is the test: three of the first four small planets around red dwarfs measured this way sit at the bare-rock limit, and the fourth sits below it by an amount that a thin atmosphere, or a brighter surface, could explain equally well.

    part 5 · exoplanets
  6. The same worlds, placed by the light that strips. The bodies of the shoreline plane, each moved from its present instellation to the cumulative X-ray and extreme-ultraviolet energy it has received over its star's life, both relative to the Earth's (arrows). The Sun's planets do not move, by construction. A planet of a small red dwarf moves up by a factor of 7 to 16: its star stayed at its saturated activity level — a thousandth of its light in X-rays and extreme ultraviolet — for 2.3 billion years for TRAPPIST-1 against 0.1 for the Sun, and its planets have absorbed that for longer. TRAPPIST-1 e, which receives 0.65 of the Earth's sunlight, has received 10 times the Earth's lifetime XUV and moves from well inside the line to above it. Every planet measured as bare, TRAPPIST-1 b, TRAPPIST-1 c, LHS 3844 b, now lies above the line. The saturation times are a scaling with stellar mass rather than a fit to any one star.

    A shoreline measured in light already spent

    In the solar system one line of slope four, in the plane of escape velocity against sunlight, separates every world with air from every world without. Drawn against the light a planet receives today it puts the temperate planets of a small red dwarf safely on the side with air. Drawn against the stripping light their star has already spent, it moves them an order of magnitude toward the airless side — and leaves most of them inside a band that the line's unknown height cannot resolve.

    part 6 · exoplanets
  7. Water that is on the star and not on the planet. Excess transit depth, in parts per million, against wavelength, for a planet of depth 7000 ppm around a star of 2600 K. The upper curve is a bare rock with no atmosphere on a star whose disc is 10% covered by 2300 K spots that hold more water than the rest of the photosphere: it shows a broad slope and a band near 1.4 μm, 36 ppm from its shoulder. The lower curve is the signal of an Earth-like air column with water on an Earth-sized planet, about 93 ppm at the band. The band in the spot spectrum is an imposed illustration rather than a model atmosphere, but its sign is measured: it adds where a planet's own water would add.

    Water that is on the star and not the planet

    A transit depth is the planet's shadow divided by the brightness of the whole star, and the shadow falls on only one strip of it. If the strip is cleaner than the rest of the disc, the depth comes out too large, by an amount that changes with colour. The star's own spots hold water, so the error has water's fingerprint. On the smallest red dwarfs, whose rocky planets are the best targets there are, that false signal is larger than the real atmosphere being looked for.

    part 7 · exoplanets

All series