Magnetosphere — the series · Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics

A boundary that a sixty-fourfold gust moves by a factor of two. The standoff distance of a dipole magnetosphere against a wind, in planetary radii, against the wind's proton density, for three wind speeds. The boundary sits where magnetic pressure equals ram pressure — the only balance available, since the field exerts no force on neutral gas and the wind touches nothing. Because a dipole falls as the cube of distance its pressure falls as the sixth power, so the standoff goes as the ram pressure to the −1/6: at 450 km/s a density of 6 per cubic centimetre puts the nose at 9.3 radii — against a measured average of ten to eleven — and a sixty-fourfold compression moves it only to 4.7. That exponent is the reason a magnetosphere is a stable thing to have. It is also the reason the boundary's position is a poor measurement of the field: a factor of two in the distance is a factor of sixty-four in what caused it, so the standoff measures the wind badly and the planet's moment hardly at all.

A boundary that hardly moves

The magnetopause sits where the planet's magnetic pressure equals the solar wind's ram pressure. Because a dipole falls as the cube of distance, its pressure falls as the sixth power — so a sixty-fourfold gust in the wind moves the boundary by a factor of two, and a boundary that will not move is what makes a magnetosphere a stable thing to have.

part 1 · sky

A factor of 100 in the wind, 8 degrees in the aurora. The latitude of the last closed field line against the solar wind's dynamic pressure, for a dipole of 0.31 gauss at the equator. The chain is short and every link is exact. Pressure balance puts the magnetopause at a distance going as the sixth root of the field pressure over the ram pressure; a dipole line reaching equatorial distance L returns to the surface at colatitude arcsin(1/√L); so the polar cap's edge is that, and the aurora sits just equatorward of it on the outermost closed lines. Across the 100-fold range of pressure drawn — which covers everything from a quiet wind to a severe storm — the magnetopause moves from 13.1 to 6.1 planetary radii and the oval from 74.0 to 66.1 degrees. The shaded band is where the oval is actually observed. The open magnetic flux is exactly the reciprocal of the standoff distance, so it rises by a factor of 2.15 over the same range — which is the quantity that actually matters for a storm, and it is the only one of the three that changes by much.

An aurora that is a sixth root inside an arcsine

The magnetopause distance fixes which field lines are open, the open ones map to a cap around each pole, and the cap's edge is where the aurora is. A hundredfold change in the solar wind moves that edge by eight degrees — and across planets whose fields differ by four orders of magnitude it moves by ten.

part 2 · sky

A substorm timed by webers and volts

The solar wind opens the Earth's magnetic field at a rate that can be quoted as a voltage — tens of kilovolts, which is webers of flux per second — and the tail closes it again. Half a gigaweber loaded at fifty kilovolts takes three hours, and three hours is how often substorms recur. The aurora's position is the open flux, its surges are the unloading, and above a certain driving the ionosphere starts to limit the circuit that drives it.

part 3 · sky

A storm's depression at the equator, as an energy. The depression of the horizontal magnetic field at the Earth's surface against the total kinetic energy of the particles trapped in the ring current, on logarithmic axes. The Dessler–Parker–Sckopke theorem makes the two proportional — ΔB/B₀ = −⅔ E/Eₘ, with Eₘ = 8.4·10¹⁷ joules the energy of the Earth's dipole field above the surface — whatever the particles' energies, pitch angles or distribution in radius. The marked storms are read off the line: a moderate storm of 50 nT is 2·10¹⁵ J of trapped particles, an intense one of 100 nT 4·10¹⁵ J, the storm of March 1989 at 589 nT 2.4·10¹⁶ J, and the lowest estimate for the Carrington storm of 1859 3.4·10¹⁶ J — a few hours of the solar wind's power flowing past the magnetosphere.

A storm weighed by a compass needle

During a geomagnetic storm the horizontal field at the equator drops by tens or hundreds of nanotesla, and a theorem says the drop is proportional to the total energy of the particles trapped around the Earth — whatever their energies, their pitch angles or their distances. A ground magnetometer therefore weighs a population tens of thousands of kilometres up, in joules, and the shape of the record says what that population is made of.

part 4 · sky

Ions picked up from Mars and swept off on loops. The paths of a hydrogen and an oxygen ion created at rest just above the dayside of Mars and picked up by the solar wind, flowing left to right at 420 km/s through an interplanetary field of 3 nT perpendicular to the page. In the planet's frame each moves on a cycloid: it is accelerated by the wind's electric field, turns in the magnetic field, comes momentarily to rest and repeats, drifting downstream at the wind's speed and reaching twice it at the top of each loop — four times the wind's energy per unit mass. The loop height is twice the gyroradius: 2923 km for hydrogen, 46774 km for oxygen, against a planetary radius of 3390 km. The oxygen is thrown clear of the planet in a single plume to one side, which is how a planet without a magnetic field loses its heavy atmosphere to the wind.

A planet that borrows the wind's field

Venus and Mars have no magnetic field of their own, yet the solar wind does not reach their atmospheres. It is stopped by their ionospheres, whose thermal pressure balances the wind's at an altitude that moves logarithmically with every gust, and the interplanetary field piles up and drapes around the obstacle to make a magnetosphere on loan. The arrangement holds only while the ionosphere out-pushes the wind, and it leaks heavy ions on loops wider than the planet.

part 5 · sky

Whether a field helped, depending on what limits the escape. The ratio of the atmospheric loss of a magnetised Earth to that of the same Earth without a field, against the Sun's age, both on logarithmic scales, set at 2 today — the magnetised planet losing more — for two ways an unmagnetised planet's loss can scale. If both planets lose atmosphere in proportion to the solar-wind power they intercept (blue), the magnetosphere's cross-section shrinks as the young Sun's denser wind compresses it while the bare planet's does not, and the ratio falls to 0.46 at 0.7 billion years: the field protected the young Earth, on balance from before 1.9 billion years. If instead the bare planet's loss is set by the ions the Sun's ultraviolet makes above it (orange), the ultraviolet rises more slowly into the past than the wind's pressure does, and the ratio grows to 3.7: the field cost the young Earth more than it saves today. The answer to whether a magnetic field protects an atmosphere is not a property of fields; it is a statement about which process limits the escape, and the young Sun amplifies the difference.

A shield that depends on what limits the leak

Today the Earth, with its magnetic field, loses ions to space about as fast as Venus and Mars without one — a little faster, by most measures. Whether that was also true under the young Sun, whose wind pressed eighty times harder, depends on something no measurement of the present can settle. If escape is limited by the wind's power, the field protected the young Earth; if it is limited by the ions the Sun's ultraviolet makes, the field cost it more than it does now. The young Sun does not decide the question. It amplifies whichever answer is right.

part 6 · sky

Two exponents a solar cycle cannot pull apart

Whether a magnetic field protected the early Earth's air depends on what limits the escape of ions from a planet without one — the ultraviolet that makes them or the solar wind that carries them off. Measured at Mars through a solar cycle, the two causes rise and fall together, and the fit that tries to separate them leaves each exponent uncertain by half its value. Remarkably, the young Sun's loss is predicted well anyway. What spoils the prediction is not the confusion but a switch between the two limits that the present-day data cannot see coming.

part 7 · sky