Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Extragalactic background light — where it appears

The surface brightness of the sky in every direction, once the atmosphere, the zodiacal light, the Galaxy and every resolved source are removed. At about 60 nanowatts per square metre per steradian it is the integrated light of every star ever formed, redshifted and summed over cosmic time.

Named by 8 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Every shell contributes the same. Concentric shells of equal thickness around an observer, with stars scattered uniformly in volume. The number of stars in a shell grows as its radius squared and the flux from each falls as the radius squared, so the two cancel exactly and every shell delivers the same total light — the drawn counts are 6, 15, 31, 55, 88, in proportion to r³ − r₀³, and the drawn sizes fall as 1/r. That cancellation is the paradox, and it is why no amount of dust helps: dust absorbs the light and then re-radiates it, and in a universe old enough for the sum to converge it would come to the same temperature as the stars. The sum diverges linearly with radius, so something has to stop it — and the only two candidates are that the shells eventually overlap, or that there are no shells beyond a certain distance because there has not been time for their light to arrive.

Why the sky is dark

In an infinite universe of stars every sight line ends on a stellar surface, so the whole sky should be as bright as the Sun's disc. It is not, and the usual answer — that the expansion redshifts the light away — accounts for a factor of six out of a hundred trillion.

cosmology · Olbers's paradox The darkness, itemised. The extragalactic background light as a spectrum: νIᵥ against wavelength, in nanowatts per square metre per steradian, with wavelength logarithmic. The total under the two humps is not read off a plot — it is the integral (c/4π)∫ε(z)(1+z)⁻¹|dt/dz|dz of the Madau–Dickinson star formation history, taking a continuously star-forming population to radiate 10¹⁰ solar luminosities per solar mass per year, and it comes to 37.5 nW m⁻² sr⁻¹. Half of it was emitted beyond z = 0.91, which is the figure's real content: the dark sky is dominated by light released when the universe was 45 per cent of its present age. The split between the two humps is an assumption rather than a result — 50 per cent of the starlight is taken to be absorbed by dust and re-radiated near 140 µm, and the shapes are lognormals of about the observed widths — but the AREA under each is the computed quantity. Measured, the two come to about 24 and 26: the calculation falls 25 per cent short, and whether the missing light is real or a residual foreground is unsettled.

The darkness has a number in it

The night sky is not black. It carries about sixty nanowatts per square metre per steradian, and that number is the sum of every photon every star has ever emitted, redshifted and added up over thirteen billion years.

cosmology · Olbers's paradox The sky's darkness, measured as an opacity. Optical depth to electron–positron pair production against gamma-ray energy, for sources at redshifts 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1, both axes logarithmic. A gamma ray of energy E is absorbed most readily by background photons near twice the square of the electron rest energy divided by E: at 1 TeV that is 2.37 µm and at 100 GeV it is 0.24 µm, so the energy axis is a wavelength axis for the background light, running backwards — and the background it is evaluated against is the same two-component spectrum the star formation history produced, not a flat number. Above the marked τ = 1 the universe is opaque. The depth is computed in the delta-function approximation, the cross-section replaced by 0.2 of the Thomson value over a bandwidth of order the energy, with the background's comoving density evolving as (1+z)^1.2. That is a factor-of-two calculation and the shape is what it gets right: the horizon closes from z = 0.59 at 100 GeV to z = 0.16 at 1 TeV. The measurement runs the other way. A blazar's spectrum is observed, the absorbed part is the difference between it and the spectrum the source is believed to have emitted, and that difference gives the background — in the near infrared, where no direct measurement can subtract the zodiacal light well enough to compete.

A background weighed by what it stops

The faintest light in the universe cannot be photographed from inside the Solar System, because the zodiacal foreground is a hundred times brighter. It can be weighed instead, by the bite it takes out of a blazar at a trillion electronvolts.

cosmology · Olbers's paradox How far a void field turns the leptons that make each cascade photon. The deflection angle of a cascade lepton over its cooling length, in radians on a logarithmic scale, against the energy of the cascade photon it produces, for fields of 10⁻¹⁸ G, 10⁻¹⁷ G, 10⁻¹⁶ G, 10⁻¹⁵ G, 10⁻¹⁴ G coherent over at least that length. The angle falls as the square of the lepton energy, so as the inverse of the photon energy: the gigaelectronvolt halo is made by the slowest leptons, which are turned most. At 1 GeV the deflections are 1e-3, 0.01, 0.11, 1.06, 10.62 rad. The dashed line is the jet's half-opening angle, 0.1 rad; a lepton turned further than that sends its photons away from the observer, and the halo at that energy disappears.

A lower limit made of three lengths and a missing echo

The only measurement of a magnetic field in the empty space between galaxies is a lower limit, and it comes from light that did not arrive. Teraelectronvolt gamma rays from distant blazars make electron pairs in intergalactic space, the pairs should re-emit the energy at gigaelectronvolts in a halo around each source, and the halos are missing. Whether that absence weighs a field of a ten-thousandth of a billionth of a microgauss depends on three lengths, the field's own tangle, and how long the blazar has been shining.

cosmology · Primordial fields How much of a background a survey can resolve, against sources per beam. The fraction of a background resolved into individual sources before confusion stops the count, against X, the number of sources brighter than the break in the counts that fall inside one beam, on a logarithmic axis. The curve is computed for counts falling as S^−2.5 above the break and S^−1.5 below it, with a source counted as recoverable while there is less than one source per 30 beams brighter than it. It is a single curve: telescope, wavelength and integration time enter only through X. Half the background is resolved at X ≈ 0.033, and the fall from nearly all to nearly none takes about four decades. The surveys are placed on it at their own beams and counts: Hubble, optical at X = 8.7·10⁻⁵, 100 per cent; Chandra, soft X-ray at X = 6.4·10⁻⁶, 100 per cent; Spitzer, 24 µm at X = 0.012, 54 per cent; Herschel, 250 µm at X = 0.043, 24 per cent; Herschel, 500 µm at X = 0.18, 11 per cent. The points do not sit exactly on the line because each band has its own slopes.

A background that stops breaking into sources

A deep enough image turns a glowing sky into a list of galaxies. Past a certain depth it stops doing so, and the depth is set by how many sources share one beam — which a longer exposure cannot change.

cosmology · Olbers's paradox The histogram of a confused map, for three faint-end slopes. The distribution of pixel values in a simulated map in which every beam holds 0.2 sources brighter than the break in the counts, for counts identical above the break (falling as S^−3.8) and falling as S^−b below it with b = 1.3, 1.5, 1.7. Pixel values are in units of the break flux per beam, measured from the map's own mean as a real map's are and no instrumental noise has been added. No single source below the break can be picked out of any of these maps, and yet the histograms differ: b = 1.3 gives a peak 0.15 below the mean, a width of 0.566 and a skewness of 2.5; b = 1.5 gives a peak 0.15 below the mean, a width of 0.629 and a skewness of 1.6; b = 1.7 gives a peak 0.13 below the mean, a width of 0.617 and a skewness of 1.5. Shallower faint counts leave a map dominated by the rarer bright sources, with a sharp peak and a long positive tail; steeper ones fill each beam with many faint sources and the histogram moves towards a Gaussian. The shape of the histogram is therefore a measurement of the counts below the level at which anything can be counted.

The histogram of a sky too crowded to count

When every beam holds more than one faint source, a map stops being a list. It remains a measurement — the histogram of its pixels carries the number of sources nobody can pick out, down to the depth where there are so many that their sum turns Gaussian.

cosmology · Olbers's paradox 40 galaxies detected, and a map of all of them: the summed light traces the structure the catalogue misses. A 160 by 160 Mpc/h slice of a simulated universe at redshift 6, its galaxies clustered on a density field and given luminosities from a Schechter function with a faint-end slope of -1.5. Left: the 40 galaxies bright enough to detect individually, above 1.5 times the characteristic luminosity. Right: the same slice as a map of summed line intensity in 32 by 32 cells, shaded linearly between the 5th and 97th percentiles of the cells, with no galaxy detected at all. The catalogue is a sparse scatter in which the structure is barely visible; the map shows it, and its cells correlate with the underlying density at 0.65. The map's light comes overwhelmingly from galaxies below the detection limit.

A map of galaxies none of which was seen

A survey that lists galaxies one by one stops at the faintest it can detect, and at high redshift most of the light comes from galaxies fainter than that. Map one spectral line in summed intensity instead, pixel by pixel and frequency by frequency, and every galaxy contributes whether it is detected or not. The fluctuations of that map have two parts — clustering, which weighs the total light, and graininess, which weighs how unevenly it is shared — so one power spectrum measures two moments of a luminosity function nobody has counted.

cosmology · Olbers's paradox The echo of a one-day flare, for four void fields. The 1–10 GeV flux of the cascade echo against the time since the start of a one-day teraelectronvolt flare of 10 Crab-days, from a blazar 500 Mpc away, both on logarithmic scales, for void fields of 10⁻²¹ G, 10⁻²⁰ G, 10⁻¹⁹ G, 3 × 10⁻¹⁹ G. The echo carries 1.0 × 10⁻⁴ erg cm⁻² in the band whatever the field — the field decides only when it arrives, and so how thinly it is spread. Half of it has arrived 14 hours after the flare began in the weakest field and 4.1 years in the strongest, and the flux at that moment falls from 1.1 × 10⁻⁹ to 1.3 × 10⁻¹³ erg cm⁻² s⁻¹. The dashed curve is the flux a space telescope needs to detect a source averaged over that long, falling as the square root of the time to a floor of 10⁻¹² erg cm⁻² s⁻¹. Counting only what arrives after the flare has ended, three of the four echoes clear it.

An echo heard only from the weakest fields

A missing gamma-ray halo gives the field in the voids a lower limit and nothing more. A flare's echo could give it a value — the gigaelectronvolt light that arrives late because the void field bent its path. But the echo carries a fixed amount of energy and the field decides only how long it is spread over, so it can be heard only from fields weak enough to deliver it quickly, and only after flares brighter than almost any yet seen from a blazar far enough away to make one.

cosmology · Primordial fields

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

BlazarCosmological dimmingOlbers's paradoxCoherence lengthComoving distanceConfusion limitCosmic infrared backgroundInverse Compton scatteringLuminosity densityMean free pathOptical depthPair cascade

All concepts