Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Interstellar extinction — where it appears

The dimming of starlight by dust grains between the star and the observer, stronger at shorter wavelengths so the star is also reddened. It must be corrected before a star's brightness can give its distance or its colour its temperature.

Named by 3 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The extinction law, for three kinds of dust. How much of a star's light dust removes, against inverse wavelength, normalised to one at the V band. Blue light is extinguished more than red, which is why reddening and extinction are the same measurement — and the hump at 4.6 inverse microns is a feature of the grains themselves, present on almost every sight line and still without an agreed carrier. Larger grains give a flatter law and a larger R_V.

Dust makes everything look further away

A star behind dust is fainter, so a distance taken from its brightness comes out too large. The same dust also makes it redder, and the reddening is measurable where the dimming is not — which is the only reason the correction can be applied at all.

starlight · Extinction The cancellation that protects the method, and where it fails. The error in distance from 0.1 magnitudes of extinction left uncorrected, against temperature, for the angle read from V and V − K through the blackbody relation's local slope, and for a standard candle in V (dashed, −4.7 per cent). For late-type stars the dimming and the reddening nearly cancel — the empirical relation gives +1.0 per cent. For hotter stars the reddening term grows and nothing offsets it: the error matches the standard candle's near 13,500 K and reaches +7.5 per cent at 20,000 K and +11.9 at 30,000 K, worse than the candle the method was meant to improve on.

The cancellation that leaves with the hot stars

The angular size of a cool giant can be read from its colour, and dust barely spoils the answer: the dimming and the reddening dust causes push in opposite directions and nearly cancel. Carried to hot stars the method gets weaker on both counts. Above about 10,000 K the colour V − K stops tracking temperature, a colour error costs more angle, and the reddening outweighs the dimming. Near 13,500 K leaving the dust uncorrected costs as much as it would a standard candle.

starlight · Angular diameter One population, two period–luminosity relations. The period–luminosity relation of 400 synthetic Cepheids spread across the instability strip, each behind a random amount of dust up to E(B − V) = 0.6: absolute magnitude in V (upper scatter) and in the Wesenheit index W = V − 2.44(V − I) (lower). In V the scatter about the fitted line is 0.57 magnitudes — 0.20 from the strip's width alone, the rest from the dust. In W it is 0.07: the dust is gone by construction, and most of the strip's width has gone with it, because a star that is hotter at a given period is bluer by about as much as dust would make it redder. That leftover 0.07 magnitudes is 3 per cent in distance per star.

A scatter that points the way dust does

A Cepheid's period fixes its luminosity only to within the width of the instability strip, and at a given period the hotter stars are the brighter ones. Dust moves stars in the colour–magnitude diagram along a line too, and the two lines point nearly the same way. A magnitude built to cancel the dust — the Wesenheit index — therefore cancels most of the strip's width as well, which is why the tightest period–luminosity relations are the ones that ignore the extinction law's own advice.

stars · Variable stars

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

ReddeningColour indexAngular diameterBlackbodyCepheid variableColour excessColour magnitude diagramDistance modulusDust grainsEclipsing binaryGrey extinctionInstability strip

All concepts