Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

K-correction — where it appears

The correction that converts a magnitude measured through a fixed filter into the magnitude the source would have had in its own rest frame. It depends on the source's spectrum, which is usually what the photometry was meant to determine.

Named by 4 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Four distances to the same galaxy. Four quantities all called "the distance", against redshift, at a Hubble constant of 67.36 km/s/Mpc, a matter density parameter of 0.3153 and a dark-energy parameter of 0.6847. They agree below z ≈ 0.1 and then part company completely. Comoving distance is the separation now, and it is what a map of the universe is drawn in. Luminosity distance is what a brightness gives, and it is larger by (1+z) because the photons arrive both redshifted and spread out in time. Light-travel distance is the age difference times c, and it is bounded by the age of the universe. Angular-diameter distance is what an angle gives, and it is the odd one: it rises, turns over at z = 1.59 where it reaches 1.79 Gpc, and falls thereafter. Past that redshift a galaxy of fixed size looks bigger the further away it is, because the universe it is being seen across was smaller when the light left it. At z = 10 the four differ by a factor of 121 between the largest and the smallest, so a sentence quoting a cosmological distance without saying which one has not given a number.

Four distances to the same galaxy

Inside the Local Group the word "distance" has one meaning. Past a redshift of about a tenth it has four, they disagree by factors of a hundred by the time the light is old, and one of them stops increasing and starts coming back.

cosmology · Distance ladder Four spectra, and 3.9 magnitudes between them at the same redshift. The K-correction — the magnitude that has to be added to compare a redshifted object with a nearby one through the same filter — against redshift, for four power-law spectra. At zero redshift every correction is zero by construction. Beyond that they diverge, because a filter at a fixed observed wavelength samples a different part of the source's own spectrum at every redshift, and how much flux is there depends on the spectrum. A flat spectrum needs no correction at all at any redshift, and the two extremes drawn differ by 3.9 magnitudes by z = 1.2. The circularity is the point: applying the correction requires the spectrum, and the spectrum is what a magnitude is being used to constrain. The dashed line is the way out — observe in a band chosen so that it lands on the rest-frame band of interest, and the spectral term cancels, leaving only the bandwidth stretch.

A magnitude in a band the source never had

A filter passes light at a fixed observed wavelength, and a redshifted source emitted that light at a shorter one. Comparing a distant galaxy with a nearby one through the same filter therefore compares two different parts of two spectra — and the correction between them needs the spectrum, which is what the magnitude was going to be used to find out.

starlight · Magnitudes Photometric against true redshift for a simulated sample. The redshift fitted from broad-band magnitudes against the true redshift, for 300 simulated galaxies — half old, half young — measured to a signal-to-noise of 10 in their brightest band in six optical bands, and fitted with the same two templates they were made from. 217 fall within 15 per cent in 1 + z of the diagonal, with a scatter of 0.053 in (the fitted z − z)/(1 + z) among them. 83 are catastrophic failures, more than 15 per cent off, and they are not scattered at random: they sit in clumps far from the diagonal, where a galaxy's break was mistaken for the other kind of break. The scatter can be improved by measuring better; the outliers are a different kind of error, and averaging does not remove them.

A redshift that is wrong by three

Most galaxies in the largest surveys will never have a spectrum. Their distances are read from five or six magnitudes, and the reading usually lands close. When it fails it does not fail by a little — a nearby galaxy is placed ten billion years away, because two different breaks in two different spectra fell into the same filter.

starlight · Magnitudes Four ways for a galaxy to fade with redshift. The dimming of a galaxy's surface brightness, in magnitudes per square arcsecond, against redshift, for the same galaxy placed at greater and greater distance. In an expanding universe the bolometric surface brightness falls as (1+z)⁴: 3.01 magnitudes by z = 1 and 7.8 by z = 5. Measured per unit frequency, as magnitudes in a filter are, one power is absorbed by the stretching of the band and the dimming is (1+z)³. If photons lost energy on a static journey ("tired light"), only one power would remain — 0.75 magnitudes at z = 1. In a static space with no loss there is no dimming at all, because flux and solid angle both fall as the inverse square of distance. At z = 1 expansion and tired light differ by 2.3 magnitudes, a factor of 8 in brightness.

A dimming short by what young stars repay

In an expanding universe a galaxy's surface brightness should fall as the fourth power of one plus its redshift; if light merely tired on its way through static space, as the first power. Measured on elliptical galaxies at redshift 0.85, it falls as about the two-and-a-half power — neither. The verdict on expansion rests on what the galaxies did in the meantime, and the decisive fact is not the size of the shortfall but its sign: expansion needs the galaxies to have been brighter when their stars were younger, and tired light needs them to have been fainter.

cosmology · Expansion

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Luminosity distanceAngular-diameter distanceDistance dualitySpectral energy distributionBalmer breakBandpassBandwidth stretchBroad-band photometryCatastrophic outlierCircular inferenceComoving distanceCosmological distances

All concepts