Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Null hypothesis — where it appears

The model of no effect against which a detection is tested: noise alone, or orbits placed at random. A result is significant only when the null rarely produces it, so a claim is exactly as strong as the null it was compared with.

Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A peak worth 10.8 in a narrow search is worth nothing in a wide one. The probability that noise alone produces a peak at least as tall as a given power, for searches over four different numbers of independent frequencies. A single frequency examined in isolation gives a one-per-cent chance at a power of 4.6; searching fifty thousand frequencies for the same one-per-cent chance requires 15.4. The threshold rises as the logarithm of the width of the search, which is why the penalty is survivable — but it is a penalty, it is often not applied, and the number of independent frequencies in an unevenly sampled time series is not the number of frequencies on the grid. Overestimating that count is conservative and underestimating it is not, which is the one asymmetry worth remembering.

The tallest peak in nothing at all

A periodogram of pure noise has peaks in it, and the tallest is not small. How tall it has to be before it means something depends on how many frequencies were searched and on what the noise actually is — and astronomical noise is almost never the white noise the standard formula assumes.

starlight · Periodograms A doubling rule, and the planet that broke it. Each planet's real semi-major axis against the value the Titius–Bode rule 0.4 + 0.3 × 2ⁿ gives it, both in astronomical units on logarithmic axes; points on the diagonal are fitted exactly. The rule gives the Earth 1.0 by construction and fits Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn within a few per cent. It needed the value n = 3 left empty until Ceres was found in its slot in 1801, and it predicted Uranus, discovered in 1781, within 2%. Neptune, discovered in 1846 by a calculation that assumed the rule, sits 22% inside its predicted place, and Pluto occupies the place Neptune should have had. Mercury is given n = −∞, which is a free choice made to fit it. The labels give each body's departure from the rule.

A spacing law that random orbits obey

The planets' distances roughly double from one to the next, and a rule written down in 1766 predicted the asteroid belt and Uranus before either was found. It failed on Neptune, and the reason it worked at all turns out to be that almost any set of orbits forbidden to crowd each other looks geometric on a logarithmic scale — as a test against thousands of random systems shows.

orbits · Harmonic law

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

BootstrapDetection thresholdFalse-alarm probabilityHarmonic lawHill stabilityIndependent frequenciesLaplace resonanceLook elsewhere effectMultiple testingThe mutual Hill radiusOrbital spacingPeriodogram

All concepts