Solar calibration — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Two scaling relations calibrated on one star
Asteroseismology gives a star's mass and radius from two numbers read off its oscillation spectrum. The two relations are exact in their exponents and approximate in their constants, and the constants were fixed by requiring that the Sun come out right — so an error of a few per cent in one observable is tens of per cent in a mass and nearly a factor in an age.
A length nobody derived, fitted to one star
Convection in a star is turbulent, three-dimensional and impossible to compute inside an evolution code. What is used instead is one number — how far a blob of gas travels before dissolving — fixed by requiring that a model of the Sun come out with the Sun's radius, and then applied to every star ever modelled.
A correction that grows as the fifth power of the frequency
Every model of a star gets its outermost layers wrong, because one-dimensional models cannot follow the turbulent convection that fills them. The error shows up in the star's oscillations as an offset that is nothing at low frequency and twenty microhertz at high, two hundred times a frequency's measurement error. It is corrected with a power law nobody can derive, and the correction recovers the star only when its shape happens to be right — which is why the ages of stars are fitted not to their frequencies but to ratios of differences the surface cannot reach.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Systematic errorConvectionLarge separationScaling relationSurface effectAcoustic cavityAsteroseismologyBenchmark starEffective temperatureError propagationEvolutionary trackFree parameter