Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Stellar age — where it appears

The time since a star formed, which is never observed and always inferred from a model. It is the least well determined of a star's basic properties, and the parameters that decide it — convective overshoot, mixing, rotation — are themselves fitted.

Named by 6 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A period, a colour, and an age. Rotation period against colour for stars of 125, 625, 1000, 2500, 4570 million years, under the empirical relation P = t^0.5189 × 0.7725(B−V − 0.4)^0.601. The isochrones do not cross and are separated at every colour by exactly the age ratio raised to 0.5189, which is what allows a single measured period to be inverted for an age once the colour is known. The Sun, at B−V = 0.653 and 4570 million years, is placed by the relation at 26.8 days against the 25.4 days it is observed to have. Three clusters are marked at a common colour to show the spacing directly. The dashed boundary at the left is where the Rossby number — the period divided by the convective turnover time — passes 2 on the oldest isochrone, at B−V = 1.35: past that point the braking weakens and the relation is known to over-predict the age, which is the one place a rotation period stops being a clock. What the figure cannot show is the scatter, which is a few days at fixed colour and age and is the real error bar on any single star.

The clock that starts by forgetting

An ordinary star tells nothing about its age. It sits on the main sequence for billions of years at almost fixed brightness and colour, and the one property that changes monotonically is how fast it turns — but only because the braking law destroys the initial condition first, and only until it stops.

stars · Magnetic braking A free parameter worth 42 per cent of an age. The main-sequence lifetime of a star against its mass, for four values of the convective overshoot parameter. A convective core has a boundary where buoyancy vanishes, and a rising blob arriving there still has momentum, so it penetrates into the stable region above and mixes fresh hydrogen into the core. How far it penetrates is not computed — it is a parameter, quoted in pressure scale heights, and the values in current use range from zero to about a third. A larger core is a larger fuel supply, so the lifetime rises and the turn-off at a given age is more massive. Across the plausible range the lifetime of a two-solar-mass star changes by 42 per cent, and an age read off a cluster's turn-off changes by the same amount. That is larger than the quoted uncertainty on almost every cluster age in the literature.

A convective boundary with no theory to fix it

A convective core has an edge where buoyancy vanishes. A blob arriving there still has momentum, so it carries on, mixing fresh hydrogen into the core and extending the star's life. How far it carries on is a fitted parameter, and across its plausible range every stellar age changes by nearly half.

stars · Stellar evolution When the stripping happens, in a model population. For the same 3,000 model planets, the share that have lost their whole envelope by each age, scaled to the share bare at 5.0 Gyr (35 per cent of the population), beside the share of the star's lifetime XUV energy delivered by then. Half of all the stripping in this model is finished by 72 Myr and nine tenths by 457 Myr, while the star has delivered 27 and 76 per cent of its XUV energy. That is the clock photoevaporation keeps: the valley is essentially finished within the first few hundred million years, because the planets near the boundary are the ones that run away, and they run away early. A mechanism powered instead by the slow cooling of the planets' own cores would keep moving planets across the valley for billions of years. The difference is in when, not where, and it is why the ages of the stars hosting planets on either side of the valley are the measurement that can separate the two.

The stripping runs ahead of the starlight that drives it

If young stars carve the radius valley with their X-ray light, the valley should be finished early — half of it before the star has delivered a third of that light, and nine tenths of it within a few hundred million years. If the planets' own cooling cores carve it instead, planets should still be crossing it billions of years later. The two accounts put the valley in the same place, and they are separated by the one thing a histogram cannot show — when.

exoplanets · Radius valley A wall measures a ratio, and a ratio is a line. The tidal quality factor against the system's age, with each line the locus of one measured circularisation boundary. For a planet the eccentricity damping time τₑ goes as Q′P^(13/3), so the cut-off period goes as (age/Q′)^(3/13) and only the ratio of the two appears. A measured wall is therefore a straight line of slope exactly 1 in this plane and never a point on it: a 5-day boundary is consistent with Q′ = 2·10⁵ in a one-billion-year-old system and with Q′ = 2·10⁶ in a ten-billion-year-old one, and nothing in the light curve chooses. The stellar version of this measurement escapes because the cluster supplies the age, from a main-sequence turn-off that owes the tide nothing — which is why a cut-off period read off four clusters is a dissipation measurement and the same wall in the hot-Jupiter plane is not. The shaded band is what a field star's age is actually worth: known to a factor of 3, it leaves Q′ known to a factor of 3 and no better, against a quantity whose published values for giant planets span 10⁴ to 10⁹. What would break the degeneracy is a second measurement with a different power of P in it — an orbital decay rate, which goes as Q′⁻¹ with no age in it at all, and which has now been measured for one planet.

A wall measures a ratio, and a ratio is a line

The same circularisation boundary drawn for planets probes the dissipation inside the planet rather than inside the star. But the boundary depends only on age over Q′, so with no cluster to date the system the measurement is a line in a plane and never a point on it.

orbits · Circularisation Isochrones that crowd on the main sequence and fan out above it. Isochrones for stars of solar metallicity at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 billion years, luminosity against temperature with temperature falling to the right. On the main sequence they lie almost on top of one another — a star brightens and barely changes colour as it ages — and only where they turn off and cross towards the giants do they separate. Two boxes show the measurement errors of a star with a good parallax and spectrum (twice 70 K and 3 per cent): one around a Sun-like star of 4.6 billion years, whose age they allow anywhere in 4.53 (3.38–5.63) billion years; one around a subgiant of the same mass at 10.5, allowed only 10.5 (10.3–10.7).

A lone star is dated only as it leaves

A star in a cluster is dated by the bend its neighbours trace. A star alone has one position on the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram, and an age for it means finding which isochrone passes through that point. On the main sequence they almost all do: a Sun-like star measured as well as a parallax and a spectrum allow is anywhere from three and a half to five and a half billion years old. A star the same mass on its way off the main sequence is dated to two per cent.

stars · The HR diagram Four clocks for a 1 M☉ dwarf, and the best of them. The fractional age uncertainty each method reaches for an isolated 1 solar-mass main-sequence star, against its age, logarithmic, for isochrones, rotation, oscillations and chemical clock, with representative published precisions. Rotation is best while the star is young, once its spin has forgotten its start and before its braking weakens; isochrones and oscillations improve with age as the star moves further on the diagram. The combination (heavy line) is 14 per cent at 1 Gyr, 9 at 3 and 4 at 8. It is better than ten per cent (dashed) from 2.6 to 9.4 Gyr.

Four clocks and the stars none of them reads

An isolated dwarf star can be dated four ways — by its position on the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram, by how fast it spins, by its oscillations, and by the ratio of two elements its galaxy made at different rates. Each clock has an age range where it works and masses it cannot read. Laid side by side for a Sun-like star they cover most of its life to ten per cent or so. For a star of eight-tenths of the Sun's mass only one clock is left, it works only while the star is young, and the commonest stars in the Galaxy's disc are dated one at a time no better than fifteen per cent at any age.

stars · The HR diagram

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

IsochroneGyrochronologyAsteroseismologyMain-sequenceMain-sequence lifetimeRotation periodCalibrationConvective envelopeConvective overshootConvective turnover timeCore massCore-powered mass loss

All concepts