Stellar population — where it appears
Named by 5 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Most stars are small, and most of the light is not
The mass function is steep and the mass–luminosity relation is steeper, so counting stars and measuring their output are integrals of the same function dominated by opposite ends of it. Every mass inferred from a brightness passes through that mismatch.
The mass that is not the light
A galaxy's mass-to-light ratio is not a number, it is a curve, and it rises without turning over. What stellar populations can plausibly weigh sets a ceiling; the dynamics sit far above it, and the gap is a shape rather than a discrepancy.
Two colours, and almost nothing between
Plot a few hundred thousand galaxies by colour and brightness and they do not fill the plane. They pile into a tight red sequence and a broad blue cloud with a near-empty gap between, and an empty gap is a statement about how fast something happens.
A mass function corrected by an age
Counting stars by mass gives the stars that are alive. What every argument needs is the stars that were born, and the two differ by the fraction of each mass still on the main sequence — which is a lifetime divided by an age, and which for massive stars in an old population is a very small number.
The count theory predicts, and the inference it costs
A luminosity function is measured. A stellar mass function is inferred, one galaxy at a time, through a ratio that runs by a factor of six from the bluest galaxies to the reddest — so the conversion changes the shape and not merely the units.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Initial mass functionMass-to-light ratioCompletenessQuenchingStar formation historyBaryonBimodalityBlue cloudBrown dwarfColour magnitude diagramDark matterDynamical mass