Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Tidal heating — where it appears

Heat generated inside a body by the friction of tides that flex it, when its orbit is eccentric or its rotation unsynchronised. It powers Io's volcanoes and can heat close-in planets, and its rate depends on a dissipation factor that is hard to compute.

Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The Moon's Cassini states as it recedes. The angle between the Moon's spin axis and its orbit normal in each Cassini state, signed so that the present state is positive, against the Earth–Moon distance in Earth radii, for the Moon's present shape (β = (C − A)/B fixed) and orbital inclination. Today the Moon sits in Cassini state 2 at 6.68°. Closer in, two more states exist, a low-obliquity state 1 and an unstable state 4; they meet and vanish at 33.8 Earth radii, where the spin-axis precession, which weakens as the cube of the distance, falls to the critical fraction of the orbit's regression. A Moon that formed close to the Earth sat in state 1 at small obliquity, growing to 21° as it receded; at 33.8 Earth radii that state disappeared from under it, and it had to move to state 2 — which at that distance is at 46°. Since then, the obliquity has relaxed along state 2 to its present value.

A state the Moon had to jump to

The Moon's spin axis sits a degree and a half from the ecliptic pole, locked in a geometry Cassini described in 1693. The lock is an equilibrium between the Earth's torque on the Moon's bulge and the slow regression of its orbit, and both depend on the Moon's distance. When the Moon was closer than about 34 Earth radii there were two more equilibria — and the one it almost certainly occupied vanished as it receded, leaving it to jump to the present one at an obliquity near 45°.

sky · Libration A wall that leans the way the damping body says. The orbital period inside which a hot Jupiter's eccentricity is damped within 3 billion years, against the planet's mass, around a Sun-like star with planet Q′ = 10⁶, star Q′ = 10⁷ and a planetary radius of 1.1 Jupiter radii. If the planet's own tide did all the damping, the wall would fall with mass, from 5.5 days at one Jupiter mass to 3.2 at ten. If the star's tide did, it would rise, from 1.5 to 2.5 days. Together they give 5.5 and 3.4. Points are measured planets: filled where the orbit is eccentric, open where it is circular. The massive planets HAT-P-2 b, XO-3 b and WASP-14 b keep eccentric orbits at periods where lighter planets are all circular, which is the lean the planet's tide predicts and the opposite of the star's.

A wall that leans towards the body that damps

A hot Jupiter's eccentric orbit is rounded off by two tides at once, one dissipated in the planet and one in its star, and they depend on the planet's mass in opposite ways. So the period inside which planets are circular should fall with planet mass if the planet does the work and rise if the star does — and the heavy hot Jupiters that keep eccentric orbits where light ones never do say which.

orbits · Circularisation

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

BifurcationCassini stateEquilibrium tideHot jupiterLibrationLunar recessionNode regressionObliquityOrbital eccentricityPlanet massRadius inflationSpin axis precession

All concepts