A stationary satellite that draws a figure of eight
Assumes Ground tracks and Equation of time.
A geostationary satellite is described as hanging over one point on the equator, and the description is exact for an orbit that no real satellite flies. What the name promises needs three things at once: a period of one sidereal day, an orbit lying in the plane of the equator, and an orbit that is a perfect circle. The first can be held to a fraction of a second. The other two are never quite zero, and the moment either is not, the satellite stops being a point in the sky and starts tracing a closed curve over the ground once a day.
The period is what matters most, and it is the one that survives. Any orbit with a period of exactly one sidereal day is geosynchronous: it comes back to the same place over the rotating Earth every day, so its ground track closes after one revolution. Geostationary is the special case of that in which the closed track has shrunk to a single point. Everything else in the family is a small closed figure, and the figures are the subject here.
Why a tilted circle falls behind and then runs ahead
A satellite in an inclined circular orbit with a one-day period covers its orbit at exactly the rate the Earth turns. If all of that motion were eastward it would stay over one meridian. It is not all eastward, and how much of it is changes round the orbit.
At a node, where the orbit crosses the equator, the satellite is climbing or descending at the inclination angle. Part of its motion is north–south, and only the fraction of it carries the satellite east. It gains longitude more slowly than the ground beneath it and falls behind. At the northernmost and southernmost points the motion is entirely eastward, and the satellite is at a latitude where a degree of longitude is a shorter distance. There it gains longitude faster than the ground and catches up.
The two effects combine into one expression. With the angle travelled round the orbit from the ascending node, the satellite’s longitude runs at against the Earth’s , and integrating that gives the offset from the mean:
The offset is westward through the first quarter of the orbit, crosses zero at the northern extreme, is eastward through the second quarter, and repeats with the opposite latitude in the southern half. A curve that goes west and back while climbing, and east and back while descending, is a loop; two such loops joined at the equator are a figure of eight.
The width has a closed form. The offset is largest where its derivative vanishes, and its value there is , which for small inclinations is in radians. The width is quadratic in the tilt while the height is linear, so the eight is always far taller than it is wide: at thirty degrees it is sixty degrees tall and eight wide, and at five degrees ten tall and a fifth of a degree wide.
The real case is a thousandth of the drawing
Thirty degrees is not a geostationary satellite. The figure at the inclinations that actually occur is so thin that it has to be drawn with an absurd stretch.
The asymmetry between the two directions decides how a real satellite is flown. The Sun and the Moon pull the orbital plane away from the equator by about 0.85 degrees a year, and holding the inclination near zero costs roughly fifty metres per second annually — the largest single item in a geostationary satellite’s propellant budget. What that propellant buys is almost entirely the height of the figure of eight. Its width at a degree of tilt is too small to matter to anybody.
The drift is not unbounded, which is the other reason operators are willing to let it happen. The Sun and the Moon do not pull the orbital plane towards some fixed tilt; they make it precess about a plane lying between the equator and the ecliptic, tilted about seven and a half degrees to the equator. An orbit left alone at zero inclination swings away from the equator, reaches a maximum of about fifteen degrees, and comes back, over roughly half a century. A satellite abandoned at the end of its life does not wander off; it traces a slow cone about that plane, and it will be back near the equator decades later.
The height matters because a ground antenna is narrow. A large dish at the frequencies used for broadcasting has a beam a tenth to a fifth of a degree across, and a satellite moving a degree north and south every day leaves that beam twice a day unless the antenna is steered to follow it. So satellites near the end of their lives are often allowed to drift into inclined orbits deliberately, saving the north–south propellant to extend their operation for years, and the ground stations that still use them are fitted with tracking mounts. The east–west position, which is what separates one operator’s slot from the next, is held as before, by the much cheaper manoeuvres that counter the slow walk of a satellite towards one of two longitudes.
Eccentricity swings the longitude, and linearly
The second imperfection is shape. An orbit with a one-day period and a little eccentricity is not always at the same distance, and by the law of equal areas it moves faster than average near perigee and slower near apogee. The ground beneath it turns at a constant rate, so the satellite runs east of its mean position around perigee and falls back west around apogee, and a satellite with no inclination at all traces a line back and forth along the equator.
The amplitude is radians, and where it comes from is worth one line. The satellite’s angle round its orbit, the true anomaly , differs from the uniformly advancing mean anomaly by to first order — the orbit’s own “equation of the centre” — and the ground turns in step with , so that difference is the longitude offset. It is linear in the eccentricity, where the inclination’s contribution to the width is quadratic, and that difference in order is why the two imperfections bind different halves of a station-keeping box. A slot a tenth of a degree wide on either side tolerates an eccentricity below about 0.0009 and a width-equivalent inclination of several degrees, so it is the eccentricity that sets the east–west limit and the inclination that sets the north–south one. Sunlight pressing on large solar panels pumps the eccentricity of a geostationary orbit round a small circle every year, which is why the eccentricity is actively managed even though nothing about it looks dramatic on a map.
The two small imperfections also have a use inside the slot, and it is the least obvious thing in this essay. Several satellites belonging to one operator often share a single orbital position — seven or eight of them in a box a tenth of a degree wide. They cannot be separated by longitude, because the box is too small, so they are separated by giving each a slightly different eccentricity and inclination, oriented differently round the orbit. Each then traces its own tiny figure, and the figures are arranged so that at every moment of the day the satellites are kilometres apart even though their mean positions coincide. The quantities fought as errors on a single satellite become the coordinates that keep a cluster from colliding.
The first of those three eccentricities is not chosen at random. It is the eccentricity of the Earth’s own orbit, and its ±1.914 degrees will reappear below as a number that has been known for centuries under another name.
Putting apogee where the service is
A figure of eight with its loops symmetric about the equator serves both hemispheres equally and neither well at high latitude: from a station far from the equator, a satellite over it is low in the sky, and above about 71 degrees of latitude it is below a ten-degree mask altogether. Add eccentricity to inclination, place the apogee over one hemisphere, and the symmetry breaks in a useful direction. Near apogee the satellite is slow and high; near perigee it is fast and low. The loop on the apogee side shrinks and the satellite lingers in it, and the loop on the perigee side swells and is crossed quickly.
That is very nearly the orbit of Japan’s Quasi-Zenith Satellite System, whose satellites spend the northern part of their day high over Japan and supplement navigation signals in cities where tall buildings hide the lower satellites of other systems. The period keeps each satellite over the same longitudes, the inclination carries it far enough north to be near the zenith, and the eccentricity, with the argument of perigee set at 270 degrees, turns an even split of the day into thirteen hours to eleven in favour of the hemisphere that wants it.
Push both numbers further and the effect becomes the design.
These are the parameters of a Tundra orbit, and a satellite radio system for North America flew three satellites in orbits of this kind, spaced so that one was always high over the continent. The inclination is not arbitrary. At 63.4 degrees the Earth’s flattening stops turning the line of apsides — it is one of the two inclinations at which that motion stands still — so the apogee stays over the northern hemisphere without propellant being spent to keep it there. At any other inclination the apogee would creep round the orbit, and the hemisphere the satellite favours would slowly change.
The two tracks in that figure are the same loop reflected through the equator. That is exactly what changing by 180 degrees should do, and it is a useful check that nothing in the construction prefers one hemisphere: the preference comes entirely from where perigee is put.
The Soviet Molniya orbit, which the Tundra orbit is often confused with, makes the contrast clear. It uses the same critical inclination and an even larger eccentricity, but its period is half a sidereal day rather than a whole one, so it is not geosynchronous at all. Its track does not close after one revolution; it closes after two, with two apogees a day over two longitudes half a world apart, each serving its own region for about eight hours. A Tundra orbit gives one region sixteen hours of a single satellite; a Molniya orbit gives two regions eight hours each. Which is better depends on how many regions there are to serve and how high a satellite is wanted over each.
Both exist because of one limitation already met. From the latitudes of Russia, Scandinavia and northern Canada, a geostationary satellite sits low on the southern horizon or below it, behind buildings and hills and through a long path of air. An orbit that parks its apogee over those latitudes puts the satellite near the zenith instead, and every argument in this section is a way of buying that elevation with eccentricity.
The figure the Sun draws
Now take the three numbers the Earth’s own orbit has — an inclination of 23.44 degrees between its axis and its orbit, an eccentricity of 0.0167, and a perigee about 283 degrees round from the ascending node — and hand them to the same construction.
Nothing about this is a metaphor. Seen from the Earth, the Sun goes once round the sky in a year along a circle tilted 23.44 degrees to the equator, at a rate that varies because the orbit is slightly eccentric. A mean Sun that went round the equator at a perfectly uniform rate would keep clock time. The difference between where the real Sun is and where the mean Sun is, read in right ascension, is the equation of time, and read together with the Sun’s declination it is the analemma — the figure of eight traced by the Sun’s position at the same clock time on every day of a year. The geometry is identical to a geosynchronous satellite’s: a body going round a tilted, slightly eccentric circle, compared with a reference that turns uniformly in the equator. Only the period is different, a year instead of a sidereal day.
The mapping between the two problems is exact, term by term. The satellite’s inclination is the obliquity. Its eccentricity is the Earth’s. Its argument of perigee is the angle from the point where the Sun crosses the equator going north — the March equinox — to the point where the Sun is nearest, which is the Earth’s perihelion seen from the other end: 283 degrees further along the ecliptic, in early January. And the sidereal day that the satellite’s period matches is replaced by the year that the Sun’s does, so a longitude offset of one degree becomes four minutes of time, because the mean Sun covers fifteen degrees an hour.
The obliquity term of the equation of time, which separates into a fictitious Sun moved to the equator, reaches just under ten minutes twice a year, and the figure of eight at 23.44 degrees is ±9.87 minutes wide. The eccentricity term reaches about seven and a half minutes once a year, and the eccentricity swing at 0.0167 was ±1.914 degrees, which is 7.66 minutes. Those are the two terms, computed here as ground tracks. Their sum should be the analemma.
The two calculations share no step and no intermediate quantity. One integrates a satellite’s position against a rotating Earth over a day; the other computes the Sun’s right ascension against a mean Sun over a year. They agree on 16.4 and 14.2 minutes because they are the same problem. The 12.2 hours the track spends north of the equator agrees too: as a fraction of a year it is about 186 days, which is the length of northern spring and summer, longer than autumn and winter because the Earth is at aphelion in July. The loop on the northern side is the smaller one for the same reason the Quasi-Zenith loop is: the body is slow at the far end of its orbit, and it lingers there.
The analemma is the ground track of a geosynchronous satellite whose inclination is the obliquity and whose eccentricity is the Earth’s. The sundial’s error and the station-keeping budget of a broadcast satellite are one piece of spherical trigonometry applied to two clocks.
What the tracks leave out
They are two-body orbits. The figures use a Keplerian ellipse with a period of exactly one sidereal day and nothing else. The Earth’s flattening, its slightly elliptical equator, the Sun and the Moon, and the pressure of sunlight all perturb a real geosynchronous orbit, and over months those perturbations move the whole figure — the inclination growing, the eccentricity circling, the mean longitude drifting. The figures are a snapshot of the shape a set of elements produces on one day.
The latitude and longitude are geocentric. A ground station does not see a figure of eight in latitude and longitude; it sees the satellite move in elevation and azimuth by amounts that depend on where the station is, and for a station far from the sub-satellite point the apparent figure is distorted and foreshortened.
And the analemma comparison is exact only to the order drawn. The equation of time used for comparison includes the Earth’s eccentricity and obliquity and the two terms’ interaction, but not nutation, not the slow drift of perihelion, and not the difference between the tropical year and the anomalistic one. Those move the extremes by seconds, which is below the tenth of a minute to which the agreement is quoted.
What the imperfections are for
Every item in the first half of this essay is a nuisance to be removed, and every item in the second half is the same effect used on purpose. Inclination is fought on a geostationary satellite because it makes a narrow beam miss; it is chosen on a Tundra satellite because it carries the satellite to a high latitude. Eccentricity is pumped out of a broadcast orbit because it walks a satellite out of its slot; it is put into a navigation augmentation orbit because it buys a hemisphere two extra hours. The figure of eight is the same figure in both cases, and the difference between a defect and a design is where the apogee has been put.
The Sun has been drawing the same figure in every sundial’s shadow since there were sundials, and the correction of up to sixteen minutes that turns a sundial’s reading into clock time is the width of it.
Still open: how many circles cover the whole Earth at once
A single geosynchronous satellite, whatever its figure of eight, serves one region, and no single orbit of any kind keeps a satellite above every point on the Earth at the same time. The question of how to arrange several so that the planet is covered continuously — how many are needed, in how many planes, at what altitude — turns out to have an exact geometric answer and a minimum below which it cannot be done at all.
About the same objects
Not linked from either essay — found by the objects both name.
- An orbit can look exactly like a circle and still not be one analemma · eccentricity · equation of time
- On Mars the orbit outweighs the tilt analemma · eccentricity · equation of time
- A plane change paid at the worst speed there is geostationary orbit · ground track
- A Sun that stops and runs backwards eccentricity · equation of time
- A swath is sized at the equator ground track · inclination
- The earliest sunset is not the shortest day analemma · equation of time
What links here
Essays that link to this one from their own argument.
- Five satellites and not four spaceflight
The objects this essay names
Each one links to every other essay that touches it.
AnalemmaArgument of perigeeCritical inclinationEccentricityEquation of timeGeostationary orbitGeosynchronous orbitGround trackInclinationStation-keeping