Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Generator

The coordinate-frames generator

One star, two coordinate systems, at latitude 52°
One star, two coordinate systems, at latitude 52°. The equatorial grid and the horizon grid drawn on the same sphere for an observer at latitude 52°. The star marked has declination 20° and hour angle -40° in the first, and altitude 45.5° and azimuth 239.4° in the second. The two frames differ by a single rotation through the co-latitude 38°, which is why the celestial pole stands 52° above the northern horizon.

The equatorial grid and the horizon grid drawn on the same sphere for an observer at latitude 52°. The star marked has declination 20° and hour angle -40° in the first, and altitude 45.5° and azimuth 239.4° in the second. The two frames differ by a single rotation through the co-latitude 38°, which is why the celestial pole stands 52° above the northern horizon.

4 essays call coordinate-frames. The drawing above is what it returns with no arguments at all; every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about.

Where it is called

Every figure listed here is the same construction drawn at different numbers, so a correction to one is a correction to all of them.

One star, two coordinate systems, at latitude 52°. The equatorial grid and the horizon grid drawn on the same sphere for an observer at latitude 52°. The star marked has declination 20° and hour angle -40° in the first, and altitude 45.5° and azimuth 239.4° in the second. The two frames differ by a single rotation through the co-latitude 38°, which is why the celestial pole stands 52° above the northern horizon. The observed sky

Where a star is depends on who is asking

The sky needs two coordinate systems because two different things stay still in it — the observer's horizon and the stars themselves. One rotation converts between them, and the angle of that rotation is the time.

 A frame whose precision stops improving because its sources move. The uncertainty in the orientation of a celestial reference frame, in microarcseconds, against the number of extragalactic sources it is built from. The falling line is what averaging alone would give: each source's position is measured to about 200 microarcseconds and combining N of them improves the frame as one over the square root of N. The upper curve adds the part that does not average down in the same way — the wander of a quasar's radio centroid as new components are ejected along its jet, which is a real motion of the thing being used as a fixed point. Three catalogue generations are marked. The frame gained an order of magnitude in a quarter of a century, and it gained it by observing more sources rather than by observing any of them better, which is the signature of a limit that is in the objects rather than in the instrument. The observed sky

A frame made of things that are not points

Every position in astronomy is measured against a set of objects declared to be fixed. The objects chosen are quasars, because they are the most distant things there are — and each of them is a jet whose radio brightness centre wanders by tens of microarcseconds as new material is ejected from the core.

 Three planes on one sky: the Milky Way crosses the celestial equator at 62.87° and its pole sits at declination 27.13°. The whole sky in equatorial coordinates — right ascension decreasing to the right, declination up — with the celestial equator (grey), the ecliptic (orange) and the galactic equator, b = 0 (blue), each a great circle drawn by rotating its own frame into the equatorial one. The north galactic pole lies at right ascension 192.86° and declination 27.13°, so the galactic plane is inclined at 62.87° to the celestial equator; the zero of galactic longitude, towards the centre, lies at 266.40°, -28.94° in Sagittarius. All three are conventions tied to physical planes — the Earth's equator, its orbit, the Galaxy's disc — and only the first two are defined by measurements that can be repeated to the precision of the coordinates themselves. The observed sky

A frame fixed before its centre was found

Galactic longitude and latitude look like the Galaxy's own coordinates, and they are a convention agreed in 1958: a pole taken from the radio map of neutral hydrogen, a zero of longitude put on a radio source then catalogued in Sagittarius, an equator drawn through the Sun. The black hole at the centre was found afterwards, three arcminutes away, and nobody moved the origin. The Sun sits twenty parsecs above the disc, so latitude zero is not the Galaxy's plane except far away — and over eighty million years the Sun will swing a hundred parsecs either side of it.

 The Sun's height, against the radius it is measured over. The Sun's height above the midplane as a survey would measure it, fitting the midplane to the stars within a projected radius R, against R, for a corrugation of 15 pc on a 2500-pc wavelength with the Sun 15 pc above the midplane beneath it. Nearby the answer is 15 pc whatever the phase; over several kiloparsecs it is the height above the mean plane: 30 pc with the Sun on a crest, 0 pc with it in a trough. Between them every intermediate value is a correct answer to a different question — a spread of 31 pc, comparable with the five to thirty parsecs the published measurements span. The observed sky

A midplane that depends on how far it is averaged

The Sun sits a little above the middle of the Galaxy's disc — twenty parsecs, by the most careful recent counts, and anywhere from five to thirty by others. If the disc were flat that scatter would be error. It is not flat: the disc near the Sun ripples vertically by tens of parsecs on kiloparsec wavelengths, and on a rippled disc the Sun's height above 'the' midplane depends on how far around it the midplane is averaged. Every value in the scatter can be a correct answer to a different question.

The whole library · All essays