Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Generator

The coordinate-frames generator

One star, two coordinate systems, at latitude 52°
One star, two coordinate systems, at latitude 52°. The equatorial grid and the horizon grid drawn on the same sphere for an observer at latitude 52°. The star marked has declination 20° and hour angle -40° in the first, and altitude 45.5° and azimuth 239.4° in the second. The two frames differ by a single rotation through the co-latitude 38°, which is why the celestial pole stands 52° above the northern horizon.

The equatorial grid and the horizon grid drawn on the same sphere for an observer at latitude 52°. The star marked has declination 20° and hour angle -40° in the first, and altitude 45.5° and azimuth 239.4° in the second. The two frames differ by a single rotation through the co-latitude 38°, which is why the celestial pole stands 52° above the northern horizon.

2 essays call coordinate-frames. The drawing above is what it returns with no arguments at all; every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about.

Where it is called

Every figure listed here is the same construction drawn at different numbers, so a correction to one is a correction to all of them.

One star, two coordinate systems, at latitude 52°. The equatorial grid and the horizon grid drawn on the same sphere for an observer at latitude 52°. The star marked has declination 20° and hour angle -40° in the first, and altitude 45.5° and azimuth 239.4° in the second. The two frames differ by a single rotation through the co-latitude 38°, which is why the celestial pole stands 52° above the northern horizon. The observed sky

Where a star is depends on who is asking

The sky needs two coordinate systems because two different things stay still in it — the observer's horizon and the stars themselves. One rotation converts between them, and the angle of that rotation is the time.

 A frame whose precision stops improving because its sources move. The uncertainty in the orientation of a celestial reference frame, in microarcseconds, against the number of extragalactic sources it is built from. The falling line is what averaging alone would give: each source's position is measured to about 200 microarcseconds and combining N of them improves the frame as one over the square root of N. The upper curve adds the part that does not average down in the same way — the wander of a quasar's radio centroid as new components are ejected along its jet, which is a real motion of the thing being used as a fixed point. Three catalogue generations are marked. The frame gained an order of magnitude in a quarter of a century, and it gained it by observing more sources rather than by observing any of them better, which is the signature of a limit that is in the objects rather than in the instrument. The observed sky

A frame made of things that are not points

Every position in astronomy is measured against a set of objects declared to be fixed. The objects chosen are quasars, because they are the most distant things there are — and each of them is a jet whose radio brightness centre wanders by tens of microarcseconds as new material is ejected from the core.

The whole library · All essays