Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Series

Low-thrust transfer — the series

6 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. 20% more Δv, spread over 26 revolutions. A continuous tangential thrust from a circular orbit of radius 1 to one of radius 6.611, integrated from dr/dt = 2r·a_T/v with the primary's GM set to 1. The spiral costs |v₁ − v₂| = 0.6111 in units of the inner circular speed, against 0.5076 for the two-impulse Hohmann drawn on the same pair of circles — 20.4% dearer, and the excess is exactly the Oberth advantage the impulsive transfer collects by burning where the vehicle is moving fastest and the spiral throws away by burning everywhere. The revolution count follows from the thrust level and nothing else, and the count drawn here is not a real one: 26 revolutions at an acceleration of 0.0015 of the inner orbit's own gravity, chosen so that the spiral can be seen at all. A real electric transfer runs nearer 3·10⁻⁵, which is 1,296 revolutions of a curve no page could resolve. Halving the thrust doubles both the turns and the time and leaves the Δv exactly where it is. That separation is the whole reason low thrust is flown at all — the Δv is worse and the propellant is not, because the exponential in the rocket equation is over Δv/(g₀Isp) and an electric engine's Isp is the larger number by more than this 20%.

    The transfer that costs more the gentler it is

    A continuous spiral from low orbit to geostationary needs a fifth more velocity change than the two-burn transfer, because the thrust is never at the one place it is worth most. It is flown anyway, and by a wide margin — because the exponential in the rocket equation changed sides.

    part 1 · spaceflight
  2. One square root that raises the orbit and turns it. The velocity budget from a 300 km circular orbit to geostationary, against the plane change carried out along the way. Edelbaum's closed form — √(v₁² + v₂² − 2v₁v₂cos(½πΔi)) with Δi in radians — puts the whole continuous manoeuvre in one square root, and at Δi = 0 it collapses to |v₁ − v₂| = 4.651 km/s, which is the spiral's cost with no plane change in it. The two-impulse curve puts its rotation into the circularisation burn at apoapsis, where the vehicle is moving at 1.608 km/s and a rotation is cheap. At 28.5° the continuous transfer costs 5.951 km/s against the impulsive 4.256 — the plane change adds 1.300 to one and 0.363 to the other. That is the opposite of the usual claim that low thrust turns for free. It turns continuously, which is not the same thing: the gain is that the propellant is not the budget, and the Δv is worse here as it is everywhere else.

    One square root that raises the orbit and turns it

    Edelbaum put the plane change inside the same radical as the raise, and the half-pi in its cosine is the whole result — a continuous turn costs π/2 times an impulsive one below 140° and less above it.

    part 2 · spaceflight
  3. There is a best exhaust speed, and the calendar picks it. Payload fraction against exhaust speed for a 11 km/s mission, at three thrusting durations, with a power plant of 0.025 kilograms per watt of jet power. The vehicle is payload plus power plant plus propellant and the arithmetic is one line: λ = e^(−Δv/c) − (αc²/2t)(1 − e^(−Δv/c)), the first term the rocket equation and the second the mass of the machine that makes the jet. They pull opposite ways. A slow exhaust burns propellant; a fast one needs power, and the power per newton rises in proportion to c, so the plant's mass rises as c². Neither end is where anybody builds, and the optimum is 3,211 s over 200 days, 6,523 s over 700 days, 11,424 s over 2000 days — the same mission, the same Δv, and the best engine for it changes by a factor of 3.6 depending only on how long there is to do it. A gridded ion engine at 3,100 seconds sits at 30.4 km/s, which suits the shortest of these and is slow for the longest. What the curve cannot show is that α is not a constant either: a solar array's mass per watt falls as the fourth power of the distance from the Sun, so the same vehicle is a different point on this plot at Mars and at Jupiter.

    The engine is chosen by the calendar

    A chemical stage's exhaust speed is fixed by chemistry. An electric one's is a dial, and turning it up costs power — so there is a best setting, and it is decided by how long the mission has rather than by how far it is going.

    part 3 · spaceflight
  4. A sail has to be tilted, and tilting it throws most of it away. The thrust on an ideal flat sail, resolved into the orbit frame, against the angle between the sail's normal and the sunline. The force is along the normal and goes as cos²α — one cosine for the area the sail presents to the light, one for the momentum the reflection returns along the normal — so the radial component goes as cos³α and the transverse one as cos²α sin α. A sun-facing sail has no transverse push at all. Its thrust is purely outward and falls as 1/r² exactly as solar gravity does, so it merely replaces μ with μ(1 − β): the orbit stays the same conic with a smaller central mass, and the vehicle raises nothing. Every manoeuvre a sail makes it makes by tilting, and the transverse push peaks at 35.26° — arctan(1/√2), differentiated rather than tabulated — where it is 0.385 of the face-on force, or 2/(3√3). Two thirds of the thrust is the price of pointing any of it somewhere useful. The lightness number β is the sail's whole specification, radiation pressure and gravity both falling as 1/r² so their ratio is a constant: IKAROS, 2010 at 1607 g/m² gives β = 9.5e-4; LightSail 2, 2019 at 156 g/m² gives β = 9.8e-3; a 5 µm film with no structure at 7 g/m² gives β = 0.219, against the 1.53 g/m² at which the Sun would push as hard as it pulls. What no figure here can show is the thing a sail actually has instead of a rocket equation, which is nothing: the exponential that limits every other vehicle is absent, and what limits this one is a structure that has to hold a square kilometre of film flat.

    A drive with no rocket equation

    Radiation pressure and solar gravity both fall as the inverse square, so their ratio is a constant of the vehicle. A sun-facing sail therefore only rescales the central mass — it has to be tilted to do anything, and the best tilt throws away sixty-two per cent of the thrust.

    part 4 · spaceflight
  5. Two ways out of a transfer orbit. The eccentricity against the semi-major axis of a spacecraft spiralling out from a geostationary transfer orbit — perigee 300 km up, apogee at geostationary height — under a continuous thrust of 0.2 millimetres a second squared, integrated through hundreds of revolutions, for two steering laws. Thrust always along the velocity (red) raises the orbit efficiently but leaves its shape almost unchanged, reaching the geostationary semi-major axis after 64 days still with an eccentricity of 0.59 — an orbit swinging between 17,000 and 67,000 km. A law that points the thrust to reduce a weighted distance from the target in both elements (blue) circularises as it raises, and reaches a circular geostationary orbit in 129 days.

    The thrust that rounds an orbit turns once a revolution

    An electric engine pushes gently for months, and the obvious way to point it — along the velocity — raises an orbit as fast as possible and leaves its shape almost untouched. Starting from an elongated transfer orbit, that is the wrong job. Rounding the orbit off needs the thrust forward at apogee, backward at perigee and sideways in between, a full turn of the thrust vector every revolution, and the law that does it can be written down from the equations for how each element changes.

    part 5 · spaceflight
  6. How hard a hovering spacecraft pulls an asteroid. The velocity change a spacecraft hovering beside a 200-m asteroid gives it in a year by gravity alone, in millimetres per second, against the hovering distance from the asteroid's centre in asteroid radii, for spacecraft of 5 t, 20 t, 50 t. The pull depends on the spacecraft's mass and the distance, not on the asteroid's mass. A 20-tonne tractor at 1.5 radii gives 1.9 mm/s a year; at 3 radii, a quarter of that. Closer is better, and the limit on how close is set by the exhaust: inside the shaded region the engines would have to point so steeply outward to keep their 20° plumes off the surface that holding station costs more than the pull is worth.

    A tow with no rope

    A spacecraft parked beside an asteroid pulls it by gravity alone, with a force set by the spacecraft's mass and its distance and nothing else. Twenty tonnes hovering a hundred and fifty metres from the centre of a two-hundred-metre asteroid moves it by two millimetres a second in a year. That is the gentlest engine there is, and its limit is not the pull but the exhaust: the spacecraft must thrust away from the rock to stay put without blasting it, and the angle that takes decides how close it can hover.

    part 6 · spaceflight

All series