Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Series

Luminosity function — the series

4 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. The luminosity function has a knee, and the knee is the point. A Schechter function with a faint-end slope of -1.25, a characteristic magnitude of -20.9 and a normalisation of 0.0093 per cubic megaparsec per magnitude, plotted logarithmically. Fainter than the knee the curve is a straight line — a power law — and brighter than it the count falls off exponentially, which is why there is no such thing as a galaxy ten times brighter than the brightest. Integrated across the range drawn, galaxies brighter than the knee are 1.3 per cent of the number and 26 per cent of the light: almost every galaxy is a dwarf, and almost all the light is not in one.

    A count with a knee in it

    Count galaxies by luminosity and the answer is a power law at the faint end and an exponential cut-off at the bright one. Almost every galaxy is a dwarf; almost none of the light is in one; and the bend between those two statements is where galaxy formation stops being efficient.

    part 1 · galaxies
  2. The count theory predicts, and the inference it costs. The galaxy stellar mass function: galaxies per cubic megaparsec per dex of stellar mass, both axes logarithmic. Two Schechter components share a characteristic mass of 10^10.66 M☉ — one of slope -0.35 carrying the quenched galaxies at the knee, one of slope -1.47 carrying the star-forming ones below it — and the dashed line is the single component a luminosity function is usually fitted with. Integrated over the range drawn it gives 0.0487 galaxies per cubic megaparsec holding 2.22·10⁸ solar masses of stars, of which 51 per cent sits above the knee. This function is not measured. What is measured is a luminosity function; turning one into the other needs a mass-to-light ratio for every galaxy in the sample, and that ratio is not a constant — it runs by a factor of about five from the bluest galaxies to the reddest, so the conversion moves the red end of the distribution further than the blue end and changes the SHAPE rather than the units. A stellar mass function is a luminosity function plus a stellar population model, and the second half is where its disagreements live.

    The count theory predicts, and the inference it costs

    A luminosity function is measured. A stellar mass function is inferred, one galaxy at a time, through a ratio that runs by a factor of six from the bluest galaxies to the reddest — so the conversion changes the shape and not merely the units.

    part 2 · galaxies
  3. Galaxy formation is inefficient nearly everywhere. Star formation efficiency — the stellar mass a halo has made, divided by the 0.157 of its mass that is baryons — against halo mass, by abundance matching. The n-th most numerous halo is assigned the n-th most numerous galaxy and nothing else is assumed: the halo count is a Sheth–Tormen mass function integrated from a linear power spectrum, the galaxy count is a measured double Schechter, and the matching is a monotone map between two cumulative counts. The curve peaks at 22 per cent, at a halo mass of 10^11.89 M☉, and falls to 0.6 per cent at the bottom of the range and 0.3 per cent at the top. A halo of the Milky Way's mass, 1.3·10¹² M☉, sits near the peak at 21 per cent — and near the peak means near the best any halo has ever managed. The two sides are two different problems and the figure cannot tell them apart: below the peak the shallow potential lets supernovae drive gas out, above it the gas falling in is shock-heated and cannot cool fast enough. What the abundance-matching assumption cannot show is scatter — it assigns one galaxy mass per halo mass by construction, and the real relation has about 0.15 dex of spread that this method is blind to by definition.

    Two counts that are not the same shape

    Dark matter halos are counted by a calculation that knows nothing about stars. Galaxies are counted by a survey. Laid on the same axes the two curves disagree at both ends and agree nowhere, and the knee is where the two disagreements hand over.

    part 3 · galaxies
  4. The same count, taken in two places. The ratio of a cluster's luminosity function to the field's, per galaxy at the knee, against absolute magnitude. Both are Schechter functions — the field at a faint-end slope of -1.25 and a characteristic magnitude of -20.9, the cluster at -1.05 and -21.4 — and they are normalised to agree at -21 so that what is drawn is a difference of SHAPE rather than of density, a cluster being some 240 times denser than the field by construction. Two things differ. The cluster's faint end is shallower: at -15 it holds 0.22 of the field's dwarfs per bright galaxy. And its knee is 0.5 magnitudes brighter, which is a factor of 1.6 in luminosity. Neither difference can be read as a cause. A cluster's galaxies are also redder, and the same photometry measures both — so a shallower faint end could mean that dwarfs were destroyed, or that they were never made, or that they are still there and have faded below the survey's limit because their star formation was stopped. The count says the populations differ; it does not say which of a galaxy's life stages the difference happened in.

    The same census, taken in two places

    Fit a Schechter function to a rich cluster and to the field around it and the two come back with different slopes and different knees. Both differences are real, and neither can be read as a cause — a cluster's galaxies are also redder, and the same photometry measures both.

    part 4 · galaxies

All series