Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Series

Synchrotron radiation — the series

5 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. Three slopes: 2.5, −0.75 and −1.25, and only the middle one is about the electrons. A radio source's spectrum across five decades of frequency, computed for an electron population with index p = 2.5 in a uniform field. Nothing in this curve is a temperature, because a power law has no scale and therefore nothing a thermometer could read. The straight section between the two bends has slope −0.75, measured here off the drawn curve, and the electron index follows from it and from nothing else: α = (p − 1)/2, so a flux ratio between two frequencies is a measurement of the energy distribution of particles in a place no detector will ever visit. The two bends are the other two measurements. Below 80 MHz the source is opaque to its own radiation and rises as ν^2.5 — a slope fixed at 5/2 by the geometry alone, whatever the electrons are doing — and the frequency at which that happens gives an angular size for a source nothing has resolved, because the turnover is where the brightness temperature meets the electrons' own. Above 12 GHz the spectrum steepens by 0.50: the electrons that radiate at high frequency lose their energy fastest, so the top of the distribution has already emptied, and the frequency of the break is a clock. What no part of this curve gives is the magnetic field. Only the field and the particle density together enter the emission, and every field strength ever quoted for a radio source comes from assuming the two share the energy equally.

    A spectrum with no temperature in it

    Every spectrum in this collection so far has been a thermometer. A radio lobe's is a power law, and a power law has no scale — so there is nothing for a thermometer to read, and what the shape carries instead is the energy distribution of the particles that made it.

    part 1 · starlight
  2. The field nobody measured, and the reason the number is quoted anyway. The energy content of a radio source against the field strength assumed for it, both logarithmic. A synchrotron luminosity constrains only the product of the relativistic electron content and the field: a bright source can be many particles in a weak field or few in a strong one, and no observation of the radiation distinguishes them. The two curves are the two costs. Assuming a weak field is expensive in particles, because the particle energy needed rises as the field to the minus three halves; assuming a strong one is expensive in the field itself, which rises as B². Their sum has a minimum at 5.0e-5 gauss, and at that minimum the particle energy is exactly four thirds of the field energy — which is where the word equipartition comes from, and it is a property of where a curve turns rather than a statement about nature. The estimate is quoted because it is robust: the minimum-energy field goes as luminosity to the two sevenths, so an order of magnitude of ignorance about the luminosity is a factor of 1.93 in the answer. It is also, for the same reason, nearly uninformative — a number that hardly moves is a number that hardly measures.

    A minimum that was mistaken for a principle

    A radio source's brightness fixes the product of its particle content and its field, and nothing about the radiation separates them. What is quoted instead is the field that makes the total energy least — and at that field the particles happen to carry four thirds of what the field does, which is where the word equipartition comes from and why it is not a physical assumption at all.

    part 2 · starlight
  3. The power a source loses to its own photons, against how bright it is. The ratio of the power a synchrotron source loses by inverse-Compton scattering of its own photons to the power it radiates as synchrotron emission, against its brightness temperature, both on logarithmic axes. To first order the ratio goes as the fifth power of the brightness temperature over 10¹² K — so at 10¹¹ K it is 10⁻⁵, negligible, and at 10¹² K it is one. The scattered photons are scattered again, and each order multiplies by the same factor, so the second-order curve rises as the tenth power: at twice the limit the total loss is 1056 times the synchrotron power, and the electrons radiate away their energy in hours as X-rays and gamma rays. A steady source cannot sit above the line where the ratio is one. That is the inverse-Compton catastrophe, and it makes 10¹² K a ceiling on the brightness temperature of any incoherent synchrotron source at rest.

    A temperature that is a speed

    No steady synchrotron source can be brighter than about a trillion kelvin, because above that its electrons lose their energy scattering their own photons faster than they can radiate it. So when a radio source is measured brighter — as the cores of quasars routinely are — the excess is not a hotter source. It is a source coming towards the observer, and the brightness temperature becomes a measurement of how fast.

    part 3 · starlight
  4. A spectral age with a ceiling, against the time the lobe took to grow. The spectral age of electrons whose spectrum breaks at 2 GHz, against the magnetic field in microgauss (curve), beside the dynamical age of a 400-kpc lobe whose head has advanced at 0.01c, 0.03c, 0.1c (horizontal lines: 130, 43, 13 million years). The spectral age has a maximum, 109 million years, at a field of 1.9 microgauss — the microwave background's equivalent field divided by √3 — because a weaker field leaves the electrons cooling on the background's photons instead. A lobe that advanced at 0.01c is 1.2 times older than any field can make its spectrum, so the disagreement cannot be removed by choosing a different field. Either the advance speed is overestimated, or the electrons at the break are younger than the lobe — re-accelerated, or freshly mixed in from the hotspot.

    Two clocks for one lobe

    A radio galaxy's lobe can be dated twice: by the break in its spectrum, where the oldest electrons have radiated away their energy, and by its length divided by the speed its head advances. The two clocks disagree, the spectral age usually several times younger, and no choice of magnetic field can make them agree for the slowest lobes. What the disagreement measures is that the electrons are not as old as the lobe.

    part 4 · starlight
  5. Spectra that age, and spectra that stop ageing. Synchrotron spectra in a 3-microgauss field, divided by the straight power law the electrons were injected with so that a spectrum with no break would be a flat line at zero, at ages of 10, 30, 100 million years. Dashed: electrons left alone, whose break falls steadily to lower frequency. Solid: the same electrons stirred throughout, gaining energy at a rate of one e-fold every 30 million years against their losses. The stirred spectra's break moves down at first and then stops, at the frequency radiated by electrons of Lorentz factor 41,763, where gain and loss balance. Read as passive spectra, the stirred ones give ages of 8.5, 18.9, 28.8 million years: the last is 3.5 times younger than the electrons are.

    A lobe that reads the time since it was stirred

    If a radio lobe's electrons are re-energised in place by the turbulence around them, the break in their spectrum stops falling and its spectral age stops growing, settling at the time the stirring takes to double their energy a few times over. The spectrum's shape does not betray it: a stirred lobe fits an unstirred one exactly. What betrays it is a map that stops ageing with distance, and a bill for energy that grows exponentially with the time the stirring lasts.

    part 5 · starlight

All series