Accelerating expansion — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
An expansion that was supposed to be slowing
Gravity is attractive, so an expanding universe full of matter must be decelerating, and the only question was by how much. Two teams set out to measure the deceleration and both found a quarter of a magnitude of extra faintness at redshift half — which is the wrong sign.
Two distances that must agree if light is conserved
A supernova's distance comes from how faint it is; an acoustic ruler's distance comes from how small it looks. In any universe whose light follows the geometry and is neither created nor destroyed, the two are tied by an exact factor of (1 + z)², whatever the universe contains. Dust that dimmed distant supernovae without reddening them could have faked the accelerating expansion — and would have broken that tie by a fifth by redshift a half. The tie holds to a few per cent.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Luminosity distanceType ia supernovaeAcoustic scaleAngular-diameter distanceCoincidence problemCosmic microwave backgroundCosmological constantDark energyDeceleration parameterDistance dualityEquation of stateGrey dust