Concept

Chromosphere — where it appears

The layer above a star's photosphere in which the temperature rises outward rather than falling. Any observation whose optical depth reaches one there sees a limb brighter than the disc's centre, which is why the Sun is limb-brightened at millimetre wavelengths.

Named by 4 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Two effects that are blind in opposite directions. The sensitivity of two magnetic diagnostics against field strength, on a logarithmic axis spanning five decades. The Zeeman effect measures the line-of-sight component and adds it up along the path, so a field tangled into 100 independent cells inside one resolution element averages down by a factor of 10 and reports almost nothing — which is exactly the situation in a chromosphere or a turbulent cloud. The Hanle effect is a different device altogether: a field precesses the atom between absorption and re-emission, so a scattering line's polarisation is rotated and reduced, and the amount depends on how far the precession gets in one radiative lifetime. That makes it sensitive around 1 gauss for a 100-nanosecond level, and — the useful part — it does not care about sign, so a tangled field does not cancel. Above the crossing at 27.7 gauss the Hanle signal has saturated and carries no strength information, and the Zeeman effect is the instrument. Neither is a measurement of the field; each is a measurement of what the field did to something else.

Two instruments blind in opposite directions

The Zeeman effect measures the component of a field along the line of sight and adds it up, so a field tangled into a hundred cells reports a tenth of one cell's strength. The Hanle effect measures how far an atom precesses between absorbing and re-emitting, does not care about sign, and saturates just where the Zeeman effect becomes useful.

starlight · Polarimetry $The sign of one gradient decides which way the disc is shaded. The emergent intensity across a stellar disc, against the fractional radius, for four gradients of the source function with depth. Every curve is the Eddington–Barbier relation evaluated at the appropriate μ and checked against a numerical integration of the transfer equation. The contrast between centre and limb is the gradient, and its sign is the gradient's sign. A source function rising inward — the ordinary case, since temperature rises inward and the source function follows it — darkens the limb: a sight line at the edge leaves from higher up, where the gas is cooler. A flat source function produces a uniformly bright disc whatever the geometry. And a source function that falls inward brightens the limb, because now the shallower ray is reading a hotter layer. That last case is not hypothetical: above a star's photosphere the temperature stops falling and begins to rise, so at wavelengths that see those layers — millimetre continuum, the cores of strong lines, the ultraviolet — the Sun's limb is brighter than its centre. Limb darkening is therefore not a property of stars but of a gradient, and the same atmosphere shows both signs at different wavelengths.$

A limb brighter than the middle

Limb darkening is not a property of stars. It is a property of a gradient, and the same relation that produces it produces the opposite whenever the source function falls inward — which it does above every stellar photosphere. The Sun's limb is darker in the visible and brighter at a millimetre, and both are the same equation.

starlight · Limb darkening

A width that knows how bright the star is

In the dark trough of a cool star's calcium K line sits a small bright emission core made in its chromosphere. In 1957 Olin Wilson and Vainu Bappu found that the core's width predicts the star's absolute magnitude over fifteen magnitudes — from dwarfs to supergiants, whatever the star's temperature and however active its chromosphere — and the simplest physical account of why reproduces the relation's existence and misses its slope by half.

starlight · Spectra

Elements sorted by how easily they lose an electron. The abundance of each element in the solar wind relative to the photosphere, normalised to oxygen, against its first ionisation potential, logarithmic: in the slow wind (filled) and the fast wind from coronal holes (open). Representative values. Elements easy to ionise — K, Na, Ca, Mg, Fe, Si, all below about 9 eV — are about three times over-abundant in the slow wind and about one and a half in the fast; those harder to ionise sit near one. The step comes at about 10 eV, which is the energy of a photon from the Lyman-α line of hydrogen: the sorting happens where hydrogen's own light sets the ionisation.

A wind that carries the ledger of its loops

The slow solar wind is richer in iron, magnesium and silicon than the Sun's surface is — about three times richer, relative to oxygen — and the elements that are enriched are exactly the ones that lose an electron easily. That sorting happens low in the chromosphere, inside closed magnetic loops, and it takes days. The fast wind from coronal holes barely shows it. So the composition of the wind arriving at the Earth is a record of where it was held, and for how long, before the field let it go.

stars · Plasma beta

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Source function Absolute magnitude Alfven wave Brightness temperature Corona Damping wings Distance indicator Eddington barbier Emission line Emission measure First ionisation potential Hanle effect

All concepts