Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Absolute magnitude — where it appears

The apparent magnitude a source would have at a distance of ten parsecs, which is a luminosity written on the magnitude scale. The difference between it and the apparent magnitude is the distance modulus, and turning it into a luminosity requires a bolometric correction that is a model rather than a measurement.

Named by 8 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Parallax for a star at 1.3 parsecs. The same star observed from two ends of a baseline. The two sight lines are 1.54″ apart, so the parallax — half of that, the shift seen from a one-astronomical-unit baseline — is 0.769″ for a star 1.3 parsecs away. The definition of the parsec is the distance at which it would be exactly one.

The triangle that reaches the stars, and stops

Parallax is the only distance measurement in astronomy that assumes nothing. It is also the only one with a hard ceiling, and everything beyond that ceiling rests on it.

starlight · Parallax The magnitude scale, plotted. The logarithm of the received light against magnitude from -27 to 32, with the vertical scale left unlabelled because only its slope matters. The relation is a straight line of slope −0.4, which is what makes five magnitudes exactly a hundredfold — and the numbers run backwards, so brighter is smaller. 9 landmarks are marked, from the Sun to the deepest exposures, spanning a factor of 1.2·10²³ in received light.

A scale that runs backwards, multiplies, and works

Brighter stars have smaller magnitudes, and five steps is a factor of a hundred. A scale invented by eye in the second century BC turned out to be logarithmic, because eyes are.

starlight · Magnitudes The distance modulus. The difference between apparent and absolute magnitude against distance, on a logarithmic distance axis. It is a straight line of slope five per decade, passing through zero at ten parsecs — the definition of the absolute magnitude. Reading a distance off it requires the absolute magnitude, which is never measured and always inferred.

A brightness is a distance only if something is known

The inverse square law turns a brightness into a distance in one line. The line contains a quantity that has never been measured for any object outside the solar system.

starlight · Magnitudes A strong line at three gravities, 6000 K. Left, one strong absorption line of Fe computed at three surface gravities and drawn on the same wavelength scale — no normalisation to each profile's own width, which is exactly what the comparison is about. The thermal core is identical in all three, because the Doppler width is 0.00223 nm at 6000 K whatever the star's size. The wings are not: collisional damping is proportional to the density of perturbers, that density is proportional to the gas pressure, and in a grey atmosphere the pressure at the photosphere is proportional to g — so log g = 4.4 carries a damping parameter 794 times that of log g = 1.5. Right, the width at a tenth of the core depth against gravity, measured off those curves: a slope of 0.499, against the half a Lorentzian wing forces. That is the second dimension of a spectral classification. The first is the temperature, read from which lines are present; this one is the pressure, read from how wide they are, and it is the whole reason a spectrum can be turned into an absolute magnitude and then into a distance.

The second thing a spectrum says

Two stars of the same colour can differ in luminosity by ten magnitudes, and the difference shows in the widths of their lines rather than in which lines are present. That width is a pressure, the pressure is a gravity, and the gravity is a distance.

starlight · Spectra The Hertzsprung–Russell diagram. Luminosity against surface temperature, both in solar units and on logarithmic axes, with temperature increasing to the left. The main sequence is computed from the mass–luminosity and mass–radius relations; the dashed diagonals are lines of constant radius.

The diagram that sorted the stars, by plotting two things against each other

Plot brightness against colour for a few thousand stars and they do not scatter. They fall on a narrow band with two islands off it, and explaining that structure is most of stellar astronomy.

stars · The HR diagram Leavitt's law, through the Milky Way calibrators. Mean absolute magnitude against the logarithm of the pulsation period, for classical Cepheids with independently known distances, and RR Lyrae itself for comparison. The line is M = −2.81 log P − 1.43: a tenfold longer period is 2.81 magnitudes brighter, a factor of 13 in luminosity. The vertical axis runs the astronomers' way, with brighter upward.

A star that tells its distance by how slowly it blinks

Some stars pulsate, and the slow ones are the bright ones. That single correlation turns a clock into a ruler, and it is how the size of the universe was first measured.

stars · Variable stars One detection, and every density it could mean. The number density of interstellar objects implied by one detection of a given size in 8 years, against the distance from the Sun inside which a survey could have seen it, for objects arriving at 26.3 km/s, if the survey caught 100 per cent, 10 per cent, 1 per cent of those passing inside that distance. Each estimate is the count divided by the rate of passages per unit density, πq²v∞ with gravitational focusing, times the efficiency. If ʻOumuamua-sized bodies could be seen inside 0.5 AU at 10 per cent efficiency, there are about 0.05 per cubic AU; if inside 2 AU with every one caught, 7.9 × 10^−4. The inferred density is a statement about the survey as much as about the visitors.

A census of visitors is a census of the survey

Three bodies from other stars have passed through the inner solar system in eight years of looking. Turning that count into a number of such bodies per cubic astronomical unit needs the volume in which they could have been seen, and that volume is set by the Sun's gravity, by each body's size and by how many weeks a survey had to catch it — so the first number the census gives is a measurement of the survey.

orbits · Hyperbolic orbits The width of an emission core against a star's luminosity. Absolute visual magnitude against the logarithm of the width of the calcium K emission core in km/s, for the Wilson–Bappu relation Mᵥ = 27.59 − 14.94 log W₀ (line), with 120 illustrative stars scattered about it by 0.5 magnitudes, the relation's typical scatter, and the Sun marked at about 33 km/s and Mᵥ = 4.83. Over a range of fifteen magnitudes in luminosity — from dwarfs fainter than the Sun to supergiants a million times brighter — the logarithm of one width predicts the magnitude to half a magnitude, whatever the star's temperature. A factor of two in width is four and a half magnitudes in brightness, sixty times in luminosity.

A width that knows how bright the star is

In the dark trough of a cool star's calcium K line sits a small bright emission core made in its chromosphere. In 1957 Olin Wilson and Vainu Bappu found that the core's width predicts the star's absolute magnitude over fifteen magnitudes — from dwarfs to supergiants, whatever the star's temperature and however active its chromosphere — and the simplest physical account of why reproduces the relation's existence and misses its slope by half.

starlight · Spectra

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Distance ladderMain-sequenceParsecApparent magnitudeAstronomical unit (AU)Damping wingsDistance modulusInverse square lawPhotometryStellar radiusSurface gravityAstrometry

All concepts