Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Astrometry — where it appears

The measurement of positions and motions on the sky, in which everything interesting is a residual left after much larger effects have been removed. Its precision is set by how well a source's centroid can be located rather than by the resolution, so a sharper image is a better position on the same photons.

Named by 9 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Ceres from five directions and no distance. Ceres seen five times over 41 days, from an Earth on a circular orbit, reduced in the plane. Each sighting gives a direction and no range, so the object is somewhere on its sight line; the five lines here span 1.37° of geocentric arc altogether, and Earth's own motion supplies the only baseline there is — 0.403 AU of its 0.691 AU of travel lies across the sight lines. A planar orbit is four numbers, so five angles over-determine it and one orbit comes out: a = 2.7658 AU, e = 0.0785. That is the answer and not an input — the sightings were generated at a = 2.7658 AU and e = 0.0785, and the solve, which sees only the directions and the dates, returns them to 3e-12. The two shaded sectors are what closes the determination: between the first and middle sightings the radius vector sweeps 0.2993 AU² in 21.0 days and between the middle and last 0.2853 AU² in 20.0 days, a ratio of 1.04918 against a time ratio of 1.04918. Slide all three crossings out along their sight lines together and that equality fails at once, so it fixes the distance by itself, with no propagation anywhere in the argument — and it gives a = 2.7658 AU over again. The two dashed curves are candidates that thread the same three sight lines at 85% and 108% of the recovered distance: a = 1.86 AU at e = 0.35, sweeping its areas in a ratio 4.5% wrong; and a = 5.61 AU at e = 0.49, sweeping its areas in a ratio 2.9% wrong. A few per cent in the distance is an orbit of another kind, which is the same fact the conditioning panel measures: one arcsecond of angle error moves a by 0.60% on this arc.

Five directions and no distance among them

An image of a moving point records an angle and throws the range away, so an orbit has to be assembled out of angles alone. How many angles are needed is not a detail of the method — it is the whole of what a determination is.

orbits · Orbit determination One admissible root, 0.01% from the truth. Gauss's reduction of three directions to a distance, drawn as the two relations whose intersection it is. Three observations of Ceres on days 0, 20, 40 of an arc, generated from its elements and used only as sight directions — no range, no radial velocity. The rising curve is geometry: the heliocentric distance a candidate at geocentric distance ρ₂ would have, r₂² = ρ₂² + 2ρ₂(R₂·L̂₂) + R₂², which contains no dynamics at all. The falling curve is dynamics: ρ₂ = A + µB/r₂³, with A and B built from the three sight vectors, the three observer positions and the three times, and containing no orbit. Eliminating ρ₂ between them gives r₂⁸ + a r₂⁶ + b r₂³ + c = 0 — an eighth-degree equation, from a problem with exactly as many equations as unknowns. Here they cross once at a positive ρ₂, at r₂ = 2.5893 AU against the true 2.5890. The other 2 real roots are rejected not by fitting but by sign: the ρ₂ each implies is negative, and an object behind the observer was not the thing observed.

Three observations and no orbit at all

Three directions in space give six numbers for the six elements of an orbit, which sounds like a solved problem. The algebra that solves it is of the eighth degree, and for a near-Earth asteroid three perfect observations can be consistent with three different orbits.

orbits · Orbit determination Two bodies at a mass ratio of 3 to 1. Both bodies orbit their common centre of mass, on similar ellipses whose sizes are in inverse proportion to the masses — here 3 to 1, so the heavier body's path is 3 times smaller.

Neither body is still, and the wobble is how planets are found

A planet does not orbit its star. Both orbit a point between them, and the star's share of that motion is small, measurable, and the reason thousands of planets are known.

gravitation · The two-body problem One star, two coordinate systems, at latitude 52°. The equatorial grid and the horizon grid drawn on the same sphere for an observer at latitude 52°. The star marked has declination 20° and hour angle -40° in the first, and altitude 45.5° and azimuth 239.4° in the second. The two frames differ by a single rotation through the co-latitude 38°, which is why the celestial pole stands 52° above the northern horizon.

Where a star is depends on who is asking

The sky needs two coordinate systems because two different things stay still in it — the observer's horizon and the stars themselves. One rotation converts between them, and the angle of that rotation is the time.

sky · Celestial sphere One path, five numbers. Left: the apparent path of a star over 4 years, with a proper motion of 193 mas a year and a parallax of 50 mas, at ecliptic latitude 42°. It is one curve and there is nothing in the sky it can be compared against — the reference stars have paths of their own. Right: the same path with a straight line taken out of it. What is left is an ellipse of semi-major axis 50.0 mas and semi-minor axis 33.5 mas, closed and repeating once a year. The two are separated by their time signatures and by nothing else: proper motion is secular and parallax is annual, in a phase the Earth's position fixes in advance. That is why the five parameters can be told apart at all, and why an astrometric catalogue quotes five rather than two — a position without them is a position at one instant, which is not a direction to anything.

Five numbers from one wiggle

A star's path across a plate is a straight line with a one-year ellipse laid on it. Nothing measures either alone — one fit yields five parameters at once, and they are separable only because their time signatures differ.

sky · Parallax The same ellipse at 955 times the size, and a quarter of a year out of step. The aberration ellipse (solid) and the parallax ellipse (dashed) for γ Draconis at four ecliptic latitudes, drawn to one scale. Aberration is v/c towards the Earth's own direction of travel, so its ellipse has semi-major axis 20.49551″ for every star in the sky; parallax is 1/d towards the Sun, so its semi-major axis is that star's own 0.02147″ — 955 times smaller, and drawn 955 times smaller here. At the ecliptic pole both are circles; on the ecliptic both collapse to lines; in between both are ellipses of semi-minor axis sin β times the major, and the ratio is identical at every latitude because both effects project the same way. The marks are the same four dates on each: they are a quarter of a year apart between the two, because the aberration displacement follows the Earth's velocity and the parallax displacement follows its position, and velocity leads position by 90° on a circular orbit. That quarter-year is the only thing distinguishing the two phenomena on the sky, and it is why Bradley, looking for the dashed ellipse in 1728, spent months unable to interpret the solid one he had found instead.

The other twenty arcseconds

Every star in the sky traces a small ellipse over a year, of the same shape as its parallax ellipse and 90° out of step with it — and the same size for all of them, near or far. Bradley found it in 1728 while hunting for parallax, and it proved the Earth moves a century before anything's distance was known.

sky · Aberration Every quasar in the sky streaming at 5.23 µas a year towards one point. Above: the apparent proper motion of distant quasars, drawn in Galactic coordinates with the centre of the Galaxy at the origin. Quasars do not move — at their distances a real transverse velocity of a thousand kilometres a second would be a hundredth of a microarcsecond a year — so a pattern in their apparent motions is a statement about the observer. Annual aberration displaces every source by v/c and returns it a year later; the Sun's velocity is not constant, and a changing displacement does not return. The Sun is being accelerated towards the centre of the Galaxy at 2.4·10⁻¹⁰ m s⁻², so the aberration vector rotates at a/c and the whole sky streams towards the same point, at (a/c) sin θ for a source θ from it. Below: that amplitude against angle from the apex, with the fitted dipole and the measurement. A circular speed of 248 km s⁻¹ at 8.28 kiloparsecs predicts 5.23 microarcseconds a year; the measured dipole in the proper motions of 1.6 million quasars is 5.05 ± 0.35, pointing to within a few degrees of the Galactic centre. The picture cannot show what took so long: the effect is a twenty-thousandth of annual aberration, it accumulates over the whole mission rather than over a year, and it is degenerate with any real rotation of the quasar frame — so a measurement of the acceleration of the solar system is also, unavoidably, an assumption that the distant universe does not turn.

The whole sky drifting towards one point

Annual aberration is the Earth's velocity, and it closes every year. The Sun's velocity is not constant, so the same effect leaves a residue that never closes — every quasar in the sky creeping towards the Galactic centre at five microarcseconds a year, which is a direct measurement of the Sun's acceleration.

sky · Aberration Parallax for a star at 1.3 parsecs. The same star observed from two ends of a baseline. The two sight lines are 1.54″ apart, so the parallax — half of that, the shift seen from a one-astronomical-unit baseline — is 0.769″ for a star 1.3 parsecs away. The definition of the parsec is the distance at which it would be exactly one.

The triangle that reaches the stars, and stops

Parallax is the only distance measurement in astronomy that assumes nothing. It is also the only one with a hard ceiling, and everything beyond that ceiling rests on it.

starlight · Parallax Two signals that peak at different separations. The astrometric centroid shift and the photometric magnification against the source–lens separation in Einstein radii, on a common horizontal axis and their own vertical ones, for θ_E = 1 milliarcseconds. The shift is u/(u²+2) times θ_E: it vanishes at u = 0, because the two images are then symmetric about the lens and their centroid is the lens itself; it vanishes as u grows, because the minor image fades and the major one approaches the source; and it is largest in between, at u = √2 exactly, where it is θ_E/2√2 = 0.3536 mas. The magnification at that separation is only 1.15, which is a nineteen per cent brightening — a signal a survey would barely flag. The two observables are therefore complementary rather than redundant. The photometric event is short, bright and centred on the closest approach; the astrometric one is broad, largest on the wings, and lasts several times longer, falling only as 1/u once the source is well away. That slow decline is why astrometric microlensing needs years of monitoring and why it was a prediction for sixty years before it was a measurement.

A centroid that moves when the brightness does not

The two images a lens makes are never resolved, but their centre of light is displaced from where the source would be — by an amount that is largest at a separation where the magnification is only 1.34, long after the photometric event is over.

exoplanets · Microlensing

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Proper motionAberrationEpochReference frameDegeneracyEccentricityOrbital elementsParallaxRadial velocitySolar apexTrigonometric parallaxAbsolute magnitude

All concepts