Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Dynamical ellipticity — where it appears

The difference between a body's polar and equatorial moments of inertia divided by the polar one. It fixes both the rate at which the spin axis precesses under an external couple and the period of the body's own free wobble.

Named by 7 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Two equilibria become four, and three worlds sit near the join. The Cassini equilibria of a spin axis, drawn against the ratio of its own precession rate to the rate at which its orbit plane turns, for an orbit inclination of 1.5 degrees. Each column of dots is the full set of obliquities at which the two precessions keep step at that ratio, found by root-finding rather than by tracing a remembered curve. Below α cos ε/|g| = 1.135 there are two such obliquities and above it there are four, and the figure checks both counts on either side of the join. The three marked bodies are placed by their own measured precession constants: the Earth with the Moon at 2.67, safely on the four-state side; the Earth without it at 0.86; and Mars at 1.06. Two of the three sit within a few tenths of the bifurcation, which is the whole reason their obliquities are not constants: near the join the equilibria are close together, the libration around them is wide, and a body pushed between neighbouring resonances wanders. The Moon's contribution to the Earth's precession constant is what moves the first mark away from that region, and the second mark is the same planet with that contribution removed. This is a two-frequency model of a many-frequency system, and the real chaos comes from the overlap of resonances it does not contain.

A tilt that is not a constant

The Earth's axis leans by 23.4 degrees, and that lean is what makes the seasons. It is also a dynamical variable with its own equilibria, its own resonances and its own chaos — and on Mars the same variable has swung between nearly zero and sixty degrees without anything having to happen.

sky · Obliquity A circular orbit has one lock, and an eccentric one has several. The strength of each spin–orbit resonance against orbital eccentricity, as the Hansen coefficient H(p, e) that multiplies the restoring torque on a permanently non-spherical body. At zero eccentricity every curve but the synchronous one is exactly zero — the figure checks that rather than showing it — so a body on a circular orbit can lock only by turning once per orbit. Away from zero the others switch on: at Mercury's eccentricity of 0.2056 the 3:2 resonance has 73 per cent of the synchronous one's strength and more than twice the 2:1's. A planet spinning down through this family therefore meets the 3:2 before the 1:1 and has a real chance of being caught there, which is what happened — Mercury turns three times for every two orbits, a fact discovered by radar in 1965 after a century of assuming it was locked. The free libration of that locked state follows from the same coefficient and the measured 2.03e-4 for (B − A)/C: 12.1 years, against a measured period near twelve. What the figure cannot show is the capture probability itself, which depends on how the tide dissipates and ranges from a few per cent for a simple constant-lag tide to more than half once friction between a liquid core and the mantle is included.

A rotation locked to the orbit, but not one to one

Mercury turns exactly three times for every two circuits of the Sun. That was not what anybody expected, and it is not an accident — on a circular orbit a tidally despun body has exactly one place to lock, and on an eccentric one it has several — with the strength of each set by a coefficient that vanishes when the eccentricity does.

gravitation · Resonance A wobble that should have stopped seventy years ago. Left, the path of the Earth's rotation pole across its own crust over 13 years, as the sum of two circular motions: the 433-day Chandler wobble at 150 milliarcseconds and the annual wobble at 90. The spiral is a beat, and its period measured off the drawn path is 6.39 years against the 6.39 the two frequencies require. Right, the same path's radius against time. Two numbers in this figure are the argument. The first is the Chandler period itself: a rigid Earth of dynamical ellipticity 0.0032737 would wobble freely at 305 days, and the observed 433 is 42 per cent longer because the Earth deforms under its own wobble and the oceans move with it — the period is a measurement of the planet's elasticity, made by watching a free motion rather than by forcing anything. The second is the damping: at a quality factor of about 100 the wobble should decay in 38 years, and it has been running for as long as anyone has watched. Something is exciting it continuously, and the excitation is fluctuating pressure at the bottom of the ocean and in the atmosphere. What the figure cannot show is the excitation itself, which is not periodic and is only visible statistically.

A wobble that should have stopped

The Earth's rotation pole wanders across its own crust in a circle a few metres wide. A rigid Earth would do it in 305 days; it takes 433, and the difference is a measurement of the planet's elasticity. At the observed damping it should have died out within a human lifetime, and it has not.

sky · Precession A moment of inertia that is a shape plus an assumption. The Darwin–Radau relation: the polar moment of inertia a body would have, given the ratio of its rotation parameter to its flattening, if it were a hydrostatic fluid. The curve passes through exactly 0.4 at q/f = 0.8, which is the uniform sphere and the one point that needs no interior model, and falls as the body becomes more centrally condensed. Four of the five worlds drawn sit on it within a few per cent of their independently measured moments, which is what makes the relation usable at all. The world that does not appear on the plot is the Moon, whose q/f is 0.025 — far outside the window in which the relation has a real solution, because its shape is a fossil frozen in when it was much closer to its primary and has nothing to do with its present rotation. That failure is the useful one. A relation that returns a wrong answer quietly is dangerous; this one returns no answer at all.

The part of a shape the spin cannot explain

A rotating planet bulges by a predictable amount. Subtract that amount from the shape actually observed and something is usually left over — a few parts in a hundred thousand for the Earth, and ninety-seven per cent of the whole bulge for the Moon. The residue is not an error. It is the only remote measurement of what a planet's interior is doing that does not average over the whole body.

gravitation · Moment of inertia Why the Moon holds the tilt still. Spin-axis precession rate against obliquity, with the solar system's own secular frequencies drawn across it. The rising-and-falling curves are α cos ε for three precession constants: the Earth as it is, with the Moon supplying about two thirds of the torque; and a Moonless Earth at two plausible rotation rates. The horizontal lines are the nodal eigenfrequencies of the planetary secular system — s₆, s₃, s₄, s₂, s₁, s₇, s₈ — which are the rates at which the Earth's own orbit plane wobbles. A crossing is a resonance: the axis is precessing about a plane that is itself turning at the same rate, the resonant angle stops circulating, and the obliquity librates instead of holding still. The present Earth precesses at 50.3 arcseconds a year, faster than every secular frequency in the list, and its nearest crossing is at 61.3°, which is 37.8 degrees from the obliquity drawn. Take the Moon away and α falls by a factor of three; the crossings come down with it, 3 of them land below 85°, and where several overlap the obliquity has no stable value at all. The Moon does not hold the axis by pulling on it. It holds it by making the precession too fast to resonate with anything.

A tilt held still by being too fast to resonate

The Moon does not hold the Earth's axis by pulling on it. It triples the rate at which the axis precesses, which lifts that rate clear of every frequency at which the Earth's own orbit plane wobbles — and a precession with nothing to resonate with cannot wander.

sky · Obliquity The nutation lines and the core's resonance. The resonance factor |σ₀ / (σ − σ₀)|, σ₀ being the free core nutation's frequency, on a logarithmic scale, against frequency in the celestial frame in cycles per sidereal day, negative for retrograde motion, with the free core nutation at a period of 430.2 days retrograde. The vertical lines are the largest forced nutations the Sun and Moon drive: the 18.6-year, annual, semiannual and fortnightly terms, each prograde and retrograde, and precession at zero. Any part of the Earth's response that involves the core is multiplied by this factor. The retrograde annual term, 365 days, is 5.6 on this scale; the prograde annual term 0.46; the retrograde 18.6-year term 1.07. The annual retrograde nutation is the one the core's resonance distorts most, because a year is the forced period nearest the core's own.

A core that wobbles at its own period

The Earth's liquid core can turn about an axis slightly tilted from the mantle's, and the flattened boundary between them pushes it back. That gives the planet a second free mode of rotation: in space a slow retrograde nutation of about 430 days, on the ground a wobble just faster than once a day. Its period is a measurement of the shape of a surface under 2,900 kilometres of rock, and it is read twice — in the nodding of the Earth's axis against the quasars, and in the rise and fall of the solid ground under the daily tides.

sky · Precession The rhythms in the rock, set by the Moon's distance. The periods of the climatic precession cycles — the precession constant plus the perihelion frequency of each of the planets that dominate the Earth's eccentricity — and of the obliquity cycle, the precession constant plus the node frequency s₃, against the Earth–Moon distance. Today they are 23.8, 22.4, 19.0 thousand years for precession and 41 for obliquity. At 341,000 km they were 14.7, 14.2, 12.8 and 20.0. The planetary frequencies are held at today's values, which the chaos of the inner solar system makes uncertain beyond a few tens of millions of years; the precession constant is the term that moves.

A rhythm in the rock that measures the Moon

The Earth's axis precesses because the Sun and Moon pull on its equatorial bulge, and two-thirds of the pull is the Moon's. When the Moon was nearer and the day shorter, the axis turned faster, and the climate cycles that precession drives were shorter. Sediments laid down 1.4 billion years ago record those cycles — and with nothing in the rock but layer thicknesses, the ratio of two rhythms gives the Moon's distance at the time.

sky · Precession

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

ObliquityPrecession constantAngular momentumCassini stateLength of dayMilankovitch cyclesMoment of inertiaSpin orbit resonanceAdmittanceBeat frequencyCapture probabilityChandler wobble

All concepts