Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Electron scattering — where it appears

The scattering of a photon by a free electron, whose cross-section is a constant independent of frequency, temperature and density. That constancy is why it gives a mass–luminosity exponent of exactly three and why the Eddington limit is proportional to mass.

Named by 5 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Opacity against temperature, and the three things that supply it. The Rosseland mean opacity of a gas of composition X = 0.7, Y = 0.28, Z = 0.02, on logarithmic axes, at 10⁻⁷ g/cm³ and 10⁻⁶ g/cm³. The three faint curves are the separate processes at the first density — electron scattering, the Kramers bound-free and free-free term, and the negative hydrogen ion — and the solid curve is their sum. Every one of them is multiplied by the fraction of hydrogen the Saha equation says is ionised at that temperature and density, or by one minus it for H⁻, which is the only reason the low-temperature end is a picture of a star rather than of a formula outside its range: ungated, Kramers alone gives 10,343 cm²/g at 5,800 K, against the 0.40 drawn here. The peak sits at 15,400 K, where hydrogen is 78% ionised — that bump is not a detail, it is the engine of a Cepheid — and the flat floor at high temperature is electron scattering, which is the one term with no temperature in it at all.

The surface that is a depth

A star has no surface. What looks like one is the level at which the optical depth reaches about two-thirds — and the edge is sharp only because the opacity climbs so steeply that the transition takes a ten-thousandth of the radius.

starlight · Opacity An exponent between 2.3 and 4, not a number. The local logarithmic slope of the mass–luminosity relation against mass — the exponent that "L ∝ M^3.5" stands in for — read off the same fit to eclipsing binaries that the relation itself is drawn from. It is a step function with two corners, and the steps are 2.3 below 0.43 M☉, 4 0.43 to 2 M☉, 3.5 2 to 55 M☉. The horizontal lines are what homology predicts: a star in radiative equilibrium has L ∝ μ⁴M³/κ̄, which gives an exponent of 3 when the opacity is electron scattering and a constant, 5.5 when it is Kramers and depends on density and temperature, and 1 where radiation pressure holds the star up and the luminosity is pinned to the Eddington value. The measured steps sit between those predictions rather than on them, which is what a real star does — no star is homologous, the low-mass ones are convective throughout and the heavy ones have convective cores, and the fitted exponents are what is left after all of that. The useful statement is not that the exponent is 3.5 but that it is between 2 and 5 everywhere and 4 in the middle, and that the reason it moves is a change of which opacity is carrying the energy out.

An exponent that is a slope, not a law

The phrase “L goes as M to the three and a half” stands in for a curve with three straight pieces and two corners. The exponent is 2.3 below half a solar mass, 4 in the middle and falls towards 1 at the top — and each change of exponent is a change in which opacity is carrying the energy out.

stars · The mass–luminosity relation A field that makes electrons transparent. The electron-scattering cross-section for photons polarised across a strong magnetic field, as a share of the free-electron value, against photon energy, for fields of 10¹², 10¹³, 10¹⁴ gauss, on logarithmic axes. Below the electron cyclotron energy — 12, 116, 1160 keV for these fields — an electron bound to the field can barely respond to a wave whose electric field is perpendicular to it, and the cross-section falls as the square of the ratio of energies. At the 10 keV of these sources' X-rays, a 10¹⁴ gauss field reduces it 13,456-fold. The Eddington limit is written with the free-electron cross-section; in such a field it is the wrong number.

A limit written for free electrons

The Eddington limit says a star cannot shine brighter than the point where its light pushes its own gas away, and the push is calculated for free electrons scattering light. In a magnetic field of a hundred trillion gauss an electron is not free. It is bound to the field, it can barely respond to light polarised across it, and the limit calculated for it is the wrong number by a factor of hundreds — which is one of two ways a neutron star can shine five hundred times brighter than it is supposed to.

stars · Eddington limit A star polarised only at its edge. The degree of linear polarisation of light from an atmosphere where electron scattering is the only opacity, against projected distance from the disc's centre in stellar radii (solid), and the relative brightness of the disc (dashed, scaled so the centre is 12). The polarisation is zero at the centre, 0.2 per cent halfway out, 1.9 per cent at nine-tenths of the radius and 11.7 per cent at the limb, always parallel to the limb. The brightness falls to a third towards the edge, so the most polarised light is also the faintest.

A polarisation that a round star cancels

In 1946 Chandrasekhar worked out that light leaving a hot star's atmosphere, where scattering by free electrons dominates, is polarised parallel to the star's edge — not at all at the centre of the disc, 11.7 per cent at the very limb. Over a round, unresolved star the pattern adds up to exactly nothing. It took seventy years to see it in the light of a whole star, because something has to break the circle first: a companion crossing the disc, a planet, or a star spun so fast that its outline is no longer round.

starlight · Polarimetry A lifetime that stops getting shorter. Main-sequence lifetime against stellar mass, both logarithmic, from a simple model in which luminosity rises as the 3.8th power of mass until radiation pressure caps it at 40% of the Eddington limit (solid), and without the cap (dashed). The Sun lives 10 billion years, a 10 M☉ star 36 million, a 40 M☉ star 3.2 million, and above about 60 M☉ the lifetime stops falling: 2.7 million at 100 M☉, 3.0 million at 300. Without the cap the steep law would give the heaviest stars lifetimes of tens of thousands of years; with it, every very massive star lives a few million years whatever its mass.

A lifetime that stops getting shorter

A star twice the Sun's mass lives a fifth as long, ten times the mass a few hundredths. Extrapolate the steep law that says so to the most massive stars known, a hundred and fifty or two hundred suns, and they should burn out in a few tens of thousands of years. They do not: every star above about sixty solar masses lives between two and a half and three million years, whatever its mass. Radiation pressure caps how bright a star can be per unit of its mass, and once luminosity and fuel both grow in proportion to mass, the mass cancels out of the lifetime.

stars · Stellar lifetimes

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Eddington limitKramers opacityMain-sequenceMass luminosity relationOpacityRadiation pressureRadiative transferAccretion columnConvectionCorotation radiusCyclotron resonanceEclipsing binary

All concepts