Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Galaxy bias — where it appears

The factor by which galaxies clump more strongly than the matter they trace, because they form at the peaks of the density field. It has to be measured or modelled before a galaxy survey says anything about the matter, and it depends on the type of galaxy counted as well as on the scale.

Named by 10 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A bump at a hundred megaparsecs. The two-point correlation function of galaxies, multiplied by the square of the separation so that the interesting part is not buried under the power law. The smooth dashed curve is the broad-band clustering — the ordinary fact that galaxies are near other galaxies, which carries no cosmological information and is treated as a nuisance term in the real analysis. The bump on top of it is the whole measurement, and its position here is not fitted: it is the comoving sound horizon at the drag epoch, integrated in this file from ∫c_s da/a²H with c_s = c/√(3(1+R)), which comes out at 146.9 Mpc — 99.0 in the h⁻¹ Mpc a survey works in. The excess says that a galaxy is very slightly more likely to have a companion at that separation than at 90 or 115, by about one part in two hundred, and the reason is that a pressure wave in the photon–baryon fluid ran outward from every overdensity for four hundred thousand years and stopped where it was when the photons let go. The points are drawn with the error a survey of a million galaxies achieves; a single pair of galaxies at 100 Mpc means nothing, which is why the measurement waited for the surveys.

The same ruler measured twice, ten billion years apart

The sound wave that produced the acoustic peaks in the microwave background also left a faint excess in how galaxies are spaced, at a separation of about a hundred megaparsecs. It is the only cosmological distance indicator whose length is set by physics rather than by a chain of calibrations.

cosmology · Baryon acoustic oscillations A slice 1,000 megaparsecs across. 872 galaxies in a wedge 1000 comoving megaparsecs deep, generated as a Thomas process — Poisson centres at 0.00012 per square megaparsec, 13 galaxies each on average, scattered about their centre with a Gaussian of 22 Mpc. That is not a simulation of how structure formed and does not pretend to be; it is the simplest clustered process whose correlation function is known exactly, which is what lets the next figure check a measurement against something rather than against itself. What it does reproduce is the impression: at this scale the distribution is obviously not uniform, there are groups and there are gaps, and the eye finds patterns in it readily — including several that are not there, because the eye finds patterns in a Poisson field too. The question the next two figures ask is the only one that settles it: at what separation does the clustering stop, and is there a scale above which a box of this universe looks like any other box?

Homogeneous above a hundred megaparsecs

Every cosmological calculation in this field assumes the universe is the same everywhere. Looked at on any scale a person can picture, it plainly is not — it is stars in galaxies in groups in clusters in filaments around voids. The assumption is not a claim about appearance; it is a claim about a statistic, and the statistic has a scale attached.

cosmology · Large-scale structure Fingers 3.1 times long, a large scale squashed to 0.92, and a test of gravity. Left: a 360-megaparsec slice of a clustered universe, as the galaxies actually sit. Right: the same galaxies as a redshift survey records them, with the line of sight up the page. Nothing has moved sideways, because an angle is an angle; every displacement is along the line of sight, because that coordinate came from a redshift and a redshift is the expansion plus whatever the galaxy is doing on its own. Two effects, opposite in sign and separated by scale. Inside a cluster the motions are virial and random, 720 kilometres a second of them, which at H₀ = 67.36 is 11 megaparsecs of smearing on an object a few across: the clusters become fingers 3.1 times longer than they are wide, all pointing at the observer, which is the one structure in cosmology that is definitely not real. On the scale of a supercluster the motions are coherent — everything is falling in, so the far side is approaching and the near side receding — and the structure is compressed rather than stretched, to 0.92 of its true extent here, measured on cluster centroids so the fingers have already averaged away. Below: why that compression is worth having. Its amplitude is the rate at which structure is currently growing, and the growth rate is Ωₘ(z) raised to a power that general relativity fixes at about 0.55. A theory of gravity that differs from general relativity on cosmological scales while matching every solar-system test changes that exponent and nothing else, and the two curves drawn — γ = 0.55 and γ = 0.68 — differ by only 4 per cent at redshift a half, against error bars of 12 per cent on the points beside them. The worst systematic in a redshift survey is the measurement — and it is a hard one, because a quarter of a change in the exponent that governs how gravity assembles structure moves the observable by less than the width of the curve it is drawn on. What the picture cannot show is the degeneracy that limits it: what is measured is fσ₈, a product, and separating the growth rate from the amplitude of clustering needs something else entirely.

A map that is not of positions

One axis of every redshift survey is not a distance but a velocity, and the difference is not noise. Inside a cluster it smears the galaxies into a finger pointing at the observer; on the scale of a supercluster it compresses the structure — and the amount of that compression is a test of gravity.

cosmology · Large-scale structure One sky with and without a local non-Gaussianity of fNL·σ = 0.3. The same scale-invariant random field drawn twice, from one seed: on the left as it is, Gaussian, and on the right after the local transformation Φ → Φ + fNL(Φ² − ⟨Φ²⟩) with fNL·σ = 0.3. Solid contours are one and two standard deviations above the mean, dashed ones below, and each map is measured against its own mean and spread. The transformation adds to every value in proportion to its square, so peaks are pushed up and troughs are pulled back towards the mean: the area above +2σ goes from 1.8 to 4.7 per cent of the map and the area below −2σ from 2.4 to 0.0, and the skewness of the values rises from −0.073 to 1.484. This is exaggerated by a factor of about 2200. The primordial potential varies by about 3 × 10⁻⁵, so even fNL = 5 — the size of the current uncertainty — makes fNL·σ about 10⁻⁴.

A test that can only fail one way

Single-field inflation predicts a local non-Gaussianity of 0.015, a skewness in the primordial potential of a few parts in a million. The measurement is −0.9 ± 5.1. A detection at the level of one would eliminate every model with a single clock at once; a null result at any reachable precision confirms nothing, because the prediction lies below anything the sky has enough independent modes to measure.

cosmology · Inflation Stretched towards the mass, sheared across it. Two rings of galaxies around the same concentration of mass. Left, galaxies physically beside it: its tidal field stretches each one along the line to the centre, so their long axes point radially and their mean tangential ellipticity is −0.30. Right, galaxies far behind it: their light is deflected past the mass and each image is sheared tangentially, with mean tangential ellipticity +0.30. The two patterns are perpendicular. A weak-lensing survey correlates the shapes of foreground and background galaxies to measure the shear, and when a foreground galaxy was aligned by the very structure that lenses the background one, their product is negative — −0.090 here — and subtracts from the signal rather than adding noise to it. What the picture exaggerates is the size: real intrinsic alignments are a per cent or two in the mean, buried under a random shape scatter of about 0.3, and are found only statistically.

The shape a galaxy was given before it was lensed

Weak lensing assumes that galaxies point in random directions, so that a coherent stretch can only have been put there by the light's journey. The tidal field that set every galaxy's spin also stretched its shape — towards the very mass that lenses the galaxies behind it — and the resulting error is not noise but a signal of the opposite sign.

cosmology · Tidal torque theory A void: a deficit of matter, and the outflow it drives. The density contrast of a typical cosmic void against distance from its centre in units of its radius (solid), from the profile fitted to stacked voids in simulations, with a central density 15 per cent of the mean and a compensating overdense ridge just outside the edge. The dashed curve is the excess expansion rate the deficit drives, v/(Hr) = −(f/3)Δ(r), for a growth rate f = 0.75: the centre expands 21 per cent faster than the universe around it, and the outflow speed, which is this rate times the radius, peaks near 0.7 void radii. Beyond the ridge the flow reverses: matter at the ridge is pulled back towards the denser wall. A void is a small open universe expanding inside a flat one, and every galaxy in it is moving outward.

An emptiness that expands faster

A cosmic void is not a hole in the universe but a region with a fifth of the average density, and gravity makes it behave like a small open universe: it expands faster than its surroundings, every galaxy in it streams outward, and in a redshift survey it is stretched along the line of sight — the opposite of what the same gravity does around a cluster. The stretch measures how fast structure grows, and the average void's roundness measures the geometry of the universe.

cosmology · Large-scale structure A velocity error that grows with distance. The uncertainty in one galaxy's peculiar velocity, v = cz − H₀d, against its distance in Mpc/h, when the distance comes from an indicator with a fractional error of 5 per cent, 20 per cent, 25 per cent (type Ia supernovae, 5%; Tully–Fisher, 20%; fundamental plane, 25%). The redshift is exact to a few kilometres a second, so the whole error is the distance error times H₀, and it grows in proportion to the distance. The horizontal line is the rms velocity of a galaxy along one direction in linear theory for the model drawn, 302 km/s. Each galaxy's own velocity is measured to better than its own size only inside 60 Mpc/h for 5 per cent, 15 Mpc/h for 20 per cent, 12 Mpc/h for 25 per cent; beyond that a single velocity is mostly noise, and a velocity survey is useful only as an average over many galaxies.

Velocities that see past the edge of the map

A redshift survey infers the motions of galaxies from the distortions of its own map. A peculiar-velocity survey measures them directly, one galaxy at a time, by subtracting a distance from a redshift — and every one of those measurements is dominated by its own error beyond a few tens of megaparsecs. What makes the survey worth doing is that a velocity answers for structure far larger than the volume it is measured in.

cosmology · Large-scale structure Haloes at the centre of a void, and in an average place. The number of dark matter haloes per unit volume and per factor e in mass, against halo mass in solar masses per h, in the universe on average (dashed) and inside a sphere of 5 Mpc/h radius at the centre of a void whose density there is 20 per cent of the mean (solid), from the excursion-set theory at redshift zero. The void's sphere holds 9.2e+12 solar masses per h of matter altogether, and no halo can be heavier than that. At the dwarf end the void holds 38 per cent of the average abundance per unit volume — more than its 20 per cent share of the matter. At the mass of the Milky Way's halo, 10¹² M☉/h, it holds 1.62 per cent. An emptiness of galaxies like the Milky Way is guaranteed by the theory; an emptiness of dwarfs is not.

A void is not short of dwarf haloes

The centre of a large void holds a fifth of the average density of matter and almost no galaxies, and it is natural to read the two facts as one. They are not. The theory of how haloes form says a void turns its matter into dwarf-sized haloes at least as readily as anywhere else — it is short of big haloes, not small ones — so a void empty of dwarf galaxies is a statement about which haloes were allowed to light up.

cosmology · Large-scale structure 40 galaxies detected, and a map of all of them: the summed light traces the structure the catalogue misses. A 160 by 160 Mpc/h slice of a simulated universe at redshift 6, its galaxies clustered on a density field and given luminosities from a Schechter function with a faint-end slope of -1.5. Left: the 40 galaxies bright enough to detect individually, above 1.5 times the characteristic luminosity. Right: the same slice as a map of summed line intensity in 32 by 32 cells, shaded linearly between the 5th and 97th percentiles of the cells, with no galaxy detected at all. The catalogue is a sparse scatter in which the structure is barely visible; the map shows it, and its cells correlate with the underlying density at 0.65. The map's light comes overwhelmingly from galaxies below the detection limit.

A map of galaxies none of which was seen

A survey that lists galaxies one by one stops at the faintest it can detect, and at high redshift most of the light comes from galaxies fainter than that. Map one spectral line in summed intensity instead, pixel by pixel and frequency by frequency, and every galaxy contributes whether it is detected or not. The fluctuations of that map have two parts — clustering, which weighs the total light, and graininess, which weighs how unevenly it is shared — so one power spectrum measures two moments of a luminosity function nobody has counted.

cosmology · Olbers's paradox A ratio relativity predicts from one density. The ratio EG — written E with a subscript G in the literature — of the lensing around a set of galaxies to their clustering and infall, against redshift. In relativity it is Ωₘ₀/f(z) and depends on nothing else: with Ωₘ₀ = 0.3153, 0.598 today, 0.455 at z = 0.32 and 0.360 at z = 1, falling because f rises towards one as matter comes to dominate. The dashed curves keep light's bending as in relativity and change how hard matter pulls, by −10% and +10% today, growing with the dark energy's share: a weaker pull slows the infall and raises EG. The point is the first measurement, 0.39 ± 0.06 at z = 0.32 from galaxy–galaxy lensing in the Sloan survey.

A ratio in which the galaxies cancel

Matter falls in one gravitational potential and light is bent by the sum of two, and relativity says the two are equal. A survey that measures both the infall of galaxies and the lensing around them can divide one by the other so that the galaxies' bias and the fluctuations' amplitude both cancel — leaving a ratio that relativity predicts from the matter density alone, and that a gravity which bends light differently from the way it pulls matter cannot fake.

cosmology · Dark energy

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Correlation functionGrowth rateLarge-scale structureModified gravityPeculiar velocityPower spectrumAlcock paczynskiCosmic voidGrowth indexRedshift-space distortionRedshift surveyReionisation

All concepts