Concept

Giant impact — where it appears

A collision between two bodies of planetary size late in a planetary system's assembly, energetic enough to melt and partly vaporise both. One of them is the leading explanation for the Moon, made from debris thrown into orbit round the young Earth.

Named by 3 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Debris discs of very different masses, fading to one line. The fractional luminosity of a debris belt at 50 AU — the share of its star's light the dust absorbs and re-radiates — against age, from a million to ten billion years, for belts that start with 1, 10, 100, 1000 Earth masses of planetesimals up to 60 km across. Each stays near its starting brightness until its largest bodies have had time to collide, 16.5 billion years, 1.7 billion years, 165 million years, 17 million years respectively, and then fades as one over the age. A heavier belt starts brighter and grinds itself down faster, and the two effects cancel: after their collisional times all belts lie on the same line, the dashed maximum, whatever their mass. At ten billion years the two heaviest differ by 1 per cent.

A ceiling that forgets how much there was

A belt of planetesimals around a star shows itself only through its dust, and the dust is ground from the belt's largest bodies by collisions. Give the belt more mass and it makes more dust — but it also collides more often, and grinds itself away faster. At late times the two effects cancel exactly, and every belt at a given distance and age lies on the same line of maximum brightness whatever it started with. A disc above that line cannot be a steady cascade, and it is telling of a recent catastrophe.

orbits · Collisional cascade
The plane a moon's orbit turns about, between equator and ecliptic. The inclination of the Laplace plane — the plane about which a satellite's orbit precesses — to the Earth's equator, against distance from the Earth in Earth radii, for an obliquity of 23.44°. Close in, the Earth's equatorial bulge dominates and the plane is the equator; far out, the Sun dominates and it is the ecliptic, 23.44° away. The dashed curve uses today's bulge, which makes the transition at 8.4 Earth radii. The solid curve lets the bulge grow with the faster spin the Earth had when the Moon was closer — a 5.3-hour day at 5 Earth radii, from the system's angular momentum alone — which moves the transition out to about 14. The Moon today, at 60.3 Earth radii, has a Laplace plane within 0.0022° of the ecliptic, so its 5.15° inclination is entirely free: nothing forces it.

A tilt the Moon should not have

A moon's orbit precesses about a plane that sits on its planet's equator close in and on the planet's own orbit far out. A Moon born in the Earth's equator and carried outward by the tides should have followed that plane all the way to the ecliptic, because the angle it keeps to it is an adiabatic invariant. It is inclined by five degrees instead, and slow recession cannot have put them there.

orbits · Angular momentum
The radius a rocky planet would have, by core fraction: at 5 M⊕ an Earth-like and a Mercury-like planet differ by 8%. Radius against mass for rocky planets of one to eight Earth masses, from Zeng and collaborators' interior models, for core mass fractions of 0, 0.33, 0.5, 0.7, 1 — from a planet with no iron core to one that is all iron. The shaded band is the range of core fractions planets would have if they kept their host stars' iron, magnesium and silicon in the stars' own proportions, for stars whose iron-to-magnesium ratio is within 0.15 dex of the Sun's: 0.26 to 0.41. The Earth, at 0.325, sits in it. At five Earth masses an Earth-like planet and one with a core fraction of 0.7, like Mercury, differ in radius by 8 per cent — a difference that transit and radial-velocity measurements can now resolve.

More iron than the star could give

A rocky planet is made of what its star was made of, minus the gases: iron, magnesium and silicon in the star's proportions, which for the Sun predict an iron core of a third of the planet's mass — and the Earth's core is 32.5 per cent. A handful of small exoplanets are so dense that their cores must hold seven-tenths of their mass, more iron than any star known to host planets could have supplied. Either something removed most of their rock after they formed, or the rock and the metal were separated before they did.

exoplanets · Planet composition

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Adiabatic invariantAngular momentumCatastrophic disruptionCollisional cascadeCollisional lifetimeCore mass fractionDebris discFractional luminosityInclinationLaplace planeMass radius relationNodal precession

All concepts