Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Gravitational lensing — where it appears

The deflection of light by mass along the line of sight, which magnifies, distorts or multiplies the image of whatever lies behind. It measures mass regardless of whether the mass emits anything, which is why it is one of the four independent routes to dark matter.

Named by 4 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A magnification, and a spike inside it. The brightness of a background star as a foreground one passes in front of it. The smooth curve is exact: a point mass magnifies a point source by (u² + 2)/(u√(u² + 4)), which peaks at 6.7 for this track. The spike is the planet, of mass ratio 0.001, lensing one of the two images. Its duration is the Einstein time scaled by √q — about 23 hours against 30 days — so the whole planetary signal is a few hours in an event lasting a month, and it never repeats. The deviation is drawn in the approximation that the planet lenses the image in isolation; a real caustic crossing has structure this smooths over, and its true height is set by the source's size rather than by the geometry.

A star magnified by a planet nobody will see again

Microlensing weighs a planet by the way its gravity bends light around it. The measurement lasts a few hours, cannot be repeated, and is the only one that does not require the planet's star to be visible at all.

exoplanets · Microlensing Why an Einstein radius is a mass. The geometry, drawn at an angle some ten thousand times larger than the real one so that anything is visible at all. Light from a source directly behind a lens reaches the observer along every path that passes the lens at the same distance, so the image is a ring rather than a point. The ring's angular radius is θ_E = √(4GM/c² · D_ls/D_l D_s), which for a lens of 1.0×10¹² M☉ at these distances is 2.52 arcseconds and encloses 10 kpc at the lens. Rearranged, it is a mass in terms of an angle and three distances — and the mass so obtained is inside a cylinder rather than a sphere, and assumes nothing whatever about the lens being in equilibrium, which is the assumption every other weighing in this collection makes.

Weighed by the light that bends past it

Every other mass in this collection is measured from something orbiting, which requires the system to have settled down. A gravitational lens weighs whatever is in the way with no such assumption — the light does not care whether the mass is in equilibrium.

galaxies · Strong lensing A cluster weighed three ways, and its stars weighed once. A cluster of galaxies with a velocity dispersion of 1000 km/s, gas at 8 keV and a strong-lensing Einstein radius of 25 arcseconds, each turned into a mass inside 1.5 Mpc by its own relation and nothing else: 7.0, 8.9 and 15.2 × 10¹⁴ M☉. The three assume, respectively, that the galaxies are in equilibrium, that the gas is, and nothing whatever — so their agreement to within a factor of 2.2 is not three restatements of one assumption. The lensing bar is the loosest of the three and is drawn that way deliberately: it measures the mass inside a cylinder of radius 109 kpc, 1.11×10¹⁴ M☉, and carrying that out to 1.5 Mpc as though it were a sphere overstates it. The stars are 2.9 per cent of it.

A cluster weighed three ways

The speeds of a cluster's galaxies, the temperature of its gas and the bending of light behind it are three measurements with almost nothing in common. They agree within a factor of two, and all three exceed the mass of the stars by about a hundred.

galaxies · Clusters Three mass models, one rotation curve. Rotation curves for three decompositions of the same galaxy, from a disc contributing 30 per cent of the outer rotation to one contributing 95. Each is the quadrature sum of a stellar disc, whose shape is fixed by the light distribution and whose amplitude is an unknown mass-to-light ratio, and a dark halo with parameters of its own. All three reproduce the same flat outer rotation, because the halo's amplitude is adjusted to make up whatever the disc does not supply. They differ in the inner few kiloparsecs, by 27 kilometres a second here — which is more than the measurement error and less than the uncertainty in the disc's own contribution, since that depends on a mass-to-light ratio nobody measures directly. The maximum-disc assumption picks the largest disc consistent with the data, and it is a convention rather than a result.

Three mass models that fit the same curve

A rotation curve is one function of radius and it is fitted with three components, only one of which is known. The stellar disc's contribution scales with a mass-to-light ratio nobody measures, and whatever the disc does not supply the dark halo does — so a family of models reproduces the same curve exactly, and choosing among them is a convention rather than a measurement.

galaxies · Dark matter

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Dark matterDegeneracyEinstein radiusMagnificationVelocity dispersionBaryon fractionThe baryonic Tully–Fisher relationBremsstrahlungCausticConvergenceCritical surface densityDark matter halo

All concepts