Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Magnification — where it appears

The factor by which lensing brightens a source, being the ratio of the lensed image area to the unlensed one. Since surface brightness is conserved by lensing, a magnification is entirely a change of solid angle.

Named by 3 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A magnification, and a spike inside it. The brightness of a background star as a foreground one passes in front of it. The smooth curve is exact: a point mass magnifies a point source by (u² + 2)/(u√(u² + 4)), which peaks at 6.7 for this track. The spike is the planet, of mass ratio 0.001, lensing one of the two images. Its duration is the Einstein time scaled by √q — about 23 hours against 30 days — so the whole planetary signal is a few hours in an event lasting a month, and it never repeats. The deviation is drawn in the approximation that the planet lenses the image in isolation; a real caustic crossing has structure this smooths over, and its true height is set by the source's size rather than by the geometry.

A star magnified by a planet nobody will see again

Microlensing weighs a planet by the way its gravity bends light around it. The measurement lasts a few hours, cannot be repeated, and is the only one that does not require the planet's star to be visible at all.

exoplanets · Microlensing Why an Einstein radius is a mass. The geometry, drawn at an angle some ten thousand times larger than the real one so that anything is visible at all. Light from a source directly behind a lens reaches the observer along every path that passes the lens at the same distance, so the image is a ring rather than a point. The ring's angular radius is θ_E = √(4GM/c² · D_ls/D_l D_s), which for a lens of 1.0×10¹² M☉ at these distances is 2.52 arcseconds and encloses 10 kpc at the lens. Rearranged, it is a mass in terms of an angle and three distances — and the mass so obtained is inside a cylinder rather than a sphere, and assumes nothing whatever about the lens being in equilibrium, which is the assumption every other weighing in this collection makes.

Weighed by the light that bends past it

Every other mass in this collection is measured from something orbiting, which requires the system to have settled down. A gravitational lens weighs whatever is in the way with no such assumption — the light does not care whether the mass is in equilibrium.

galaxies · Strong lensing Where the quasar counts turn over, the signal changes sign. The local slope s of quasar number counts against limiting magnitude (solid), for counts that steepen to 0.90 at the bright end and flatten to 0.29 at the faint end with a turnover near magnitude 19, and the factor 2.5s − 1 that multiplies twice the convergence in the change of counts (dashed). The factor crosses zero at magnitude 20.1: brighter quasars are found in excess round foreground galaxies, fainter ones in deficit, and quasars near the crossing show no correlation at all. The predicted reversal, observed, is what identifies the correlation as lensing rather than as dust or as quasars and galaxies sitting in the same structures.

A lens counted instead of measured

A foreground mass makes the sources behind it brighter and spreads them over a larger patch of sky. Whether the patch then holds more of them or fewer depends only on how steeply their numbers rise towards faint fluxes, and at one slope the two effects cancel exactly. So a lens can be weighed without measuring a single shape — by counting — and the signal changes sign from bright quasars to faint ones in a way that nothing but lensing can imitate.

galaxies · Weak lensing

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Gravitational lensingConvergenceEinstein radiusThe mass-sheet degeneracyCausticCritical surface densityDark matterDeflection angleDegeneracyFree-floating planetImage multiplicityLight curve

All concepts