Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Hill sphere — where it appears

The region around a planet within which a satellite is not taken away by the Sun, being the lobe a zero-velocity surface closes around it. Its radius is the orbital distance times the cube root of a third of the mass ratio, and the observed outer edges of the satellite systems sit at about half of it.

Named by 9 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Zero-velocity curves, mass fraction 0.15. Level sets of the Jacobi constant in the frame that rotates with the two bodies. A particle with a given value of C is confined to the side of its own curve where the kinetic energy would be positive; as C falls the curves open, first at the inner point between the bodies, then behind the smaller one, and finally around the whole system.

The curve that says where a body cannot go

The restricted three-body problem has no solution and one conserved quantity. That quantity is enough to draw a boundary the body can never cross — without integrating anything, without knowing where it started, and for all time.

gravitation · The three-body problem The Hill radius against the mass ratio, and where four planets keep their outermost moon. The Hill radius R_H = a(μ/3)^⅓ and the exact L₁ distance from the same quintic, both in units of the planet's own semi-major axis, against the mass ratio μ = m/(M+m) from 10⁻⁸ to 0.12. The two are the same line to the width of the stroke across the whole planetary range — the cube-root formula runs 0.33% short of the exact L₁ distance at the Earth's mass ratio and 10.0% short at the right-hand edge — so the departure between them is drawn on its own percentage scale at the right, which is the only place it can be seen. Below the curves are the numerically determined stability limits, 0.5 R_H for a prograde satellite and 0.7 R_H for a retrograde one, and the outermost known satellite of each of four planets, each at a Hill fraction computed from that planet's own mass and orbit: Moon 0.257, Sinope 0.451, Phoebe 0.198, Neso 0.424. Of the four, three are retrograde — Sinope, Phoebe, Neso — and they reach 0.451 of their planet's Hill radius against 0.257 for the one prograde satellite: 1.8 times as far out, in a diagram whose two stability limits stand in the ratio 0.7 to 0.5. No equilibrium argument predicts that, and it is what the drawing makes plain.

The region a planet may keep a moon in

A satellite is not held by orbiting but by orbiting inside the radius at which the Sun's tidal field would take it away. That radius is the same distance the innermost Lagrange point sits at, asked a different question — and the boundary the sky actually respects is smaller, by a factor that depends on which way the moon is going round.

gravitation · Hill sphere At the Sun–Earth L₂ the cheapest correction is every 23 days, and it costs e σ per e-folding. The annual station-keeping cost at the Sun–Earth L₂ point, against the interval between corrections, on logarithmic axes, for velocity errors of 0.5 cm/s, 2.0 cm/s, 5.0 cm/s along the unstable direction at each correction. Correcting often costs a lot because every correction carries its own error σ; correcting rarely costs a lot because the error has grown by e^(T/τ) in between, with an e-folding time τ = 23.4 days set by the point's growth rate of 2.484 times the orbital mean motion. The product (365.25/T) σ e^(T/τ) has its minimum at exactly T = τ, where the annual cost is 365.25 e σ/τ: 0.21 m/s a year for σ = 0.5 cm/s, 0.85 m/s a year for σ = 2.0 cm/s, 2.12 m/s a year for σ = 5.0 cm/s. The minimum is broad, so an operator can correct at a convenient interval near the e-folding time for little penalty, and the cost scales linearly with how well the spacecraft's velocity is known and executed. This is a one-dimensional caricature: a real halo orbit's correction also removes a stable component it need not, and solar radiation pressure on a large sunshield is a steady error source of its own. The figure's claim is the structure — an unstable equilibrium is cheap to hold if the instability is caught while it is still small, and its cost is a navigation budget rather than a force budget.

An unstable point that costs less to hold than a stable orbit

A spacecraft at the Sun–Earth L₂ point sits on an equilibrium that throws it away, doubling any error every sixteen days. It holds station for a few metres per second a year — a twentieth of what a geostationary satellite pays to stay on an orbit that is stable. The difference is what is being paid for — an instability caught small costs a navigation budget, and a steady torque costs a force budget.

spaceflight · Station-keeping The quantity a capture has to change. The Jacobi constant along three trajectories through the same encounter with the secondary, integrated in the rotating frame at mass fraction 0.0009543. The undissipated one holds its value to 3e-11 over the whole passage — that is not an approximation but an identity of the equations of motion, and the residual is the integrator's. A body that enters through the neck at L₁ with the neck open leaves through it, because C has not changed and the neck is still open; a purely gravitational two-body encounter is time-reversible and cannot end in a bound orbit. The other two runs remove energy in the rotating frame. A drag proportional to velocity raises C continuously at a rate 2k v², and a single impulse against the motion raises it in a step. Both finish above C(L₁) = 3.039, which is the line at which the neck shuts and the body is trapped in the secondary's lobe. Which mechanism operated for a given satellite is not recoverable from its orbit today — but it is partly recoverable from the population, because the three leave different distributions behind.

A moon that two bodies could not have caught

A body that falls into a planet's Hill sphere under gravity alone leaves it again, because the quantity the rotating frame conserves is the same on the way out as on the way in. Every captured moon is therefore a record of something that removed energy — and which of the three candidates did it is written in the inclinations rather than in any one orbit.

gravitation · Hill sphere A limit with a notch cut in the middle of it. The stability limit for a satellite, in units of its planet's Hill radius, against the inclination of its orbit to the planet's. The two flat stretches are the coplanar answers — 0.5 prograde and 0.7 retrograde, the difference between them being the Coriolis asymmetry that a rotating frame imposes and no potential can hold. Between them the limit is not an interpolation. Inside the shaded band, from 39.23° to 140.77°, the Sun's averaged perturbation exchanges the orbit's inclination for its eccentricity, and a satellite whose semi-major axis is comfortably inside the lobe has an apocentre that is not — so the boundary is set by a(1 + eₘₐₓ) rather than by a, and it falls to exactly half the coplanar value at ninety degrees. The band edges are cos²i = 3/5 exactly, with no fitted quantity anywhere in them, and the notch is the reason a quoted stability limit in Hill radii is a statement about a coplanar orbit and not about a satellite.

A stability limit with a notch cut in it

The two numbers usually quoted for how far out a moon may orbit are coplanar numbers. A tilted orbit is not somewhere between them: inside a band of inclination fifty-six degrees wide the Sun converts the tilt into an eccentricity, the apocentre rather than the semi-major axis has to stay inside the lobe, and the limit falls to half. The band is empty in the sky.

gravitation · Hill sphere One patch of ring, many optical depths. The normal optical depth an observer infers from the starlight transmitted through one patch of the A ring, treating it as a uniform sheet, against the direction of the sight line projected onto the ring plane — measured round from the radial direction — for sight lines 12°, 30°, 60° above the plane. The ring is the slab-and-gap model of the wakes: slabs 33 m wide and 8 m tall every 60 m, tilted 22° from the orbital direction, gaps of optical depth 0.12. The minima are where the sight line runs along the slabs, twice per circle; the maxima where it runs across them, where at low elevation the slabs' shadows close the gaps altogether (curves cut off at 3). At 12° the inferred value runs from 0.29 to opaque; at 60° from 0.81 to 0.97. The dashed line is the same particles spread into a uniform layer, 1.43: every observer along the slabs sees less ring than is there.

A ring that is thinner from one side

Saturn's A ring is not a sheet of particles but a field of tilted slabs, each a few dozen metres across, pulled together by the ring's own gravity and sheared apart again within an orbit. Starlight passing through it threads the gaps or meets the slabs depending on its direction, so one patch of ring has a different optical depth for every observer — and a uniform model of it hides most of the particles it contains.

gravitation · Planetary rings An arrival held without a burn, and released. A body approaching a planet from a heliocentric orbit just outside the planet's, drawn in the planet's rotating frame (the Sun far to the left, the planet's orbital motion upward), in units in which the Hill radius is 0.69. It drifts in along the shear of the differential rotation, passes through the neck at the Lagrange point L2 into the region the planet controls, loops round the planet 3.3 times and leaves through a neck again. No burn is drawn: the capture and the release are both the Sun's tide working against the planet's pull. For Mars one unit of distance is 1.56 million km and an orbit round the planet near the Hill radius takes about a year.

An arrival the Sun hands over

A spacecraft that reaches a planet with no speed to spare can be captured with no burn at all, passing through the neck between the planet's gravity and the Sun's into a loose, looping orbit. The capture is temporary and chaotic — a few revolutions, and arrivals a few hundred kilometres apart end differently — but while it lasts the spacecraft is already bound, and the burn that keeps it is taken from there.

spaceflight · Escape A loop round the Earth that the Earth does not make. The path over one year, in the frame that turns with the Earth (Earth at the centre, the Sun far to the left, the Earth's motion upward), of bodies on heliocentric orbits with the Earth's period and eccentricities of 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, started at the Earth's mean longitude. Each traces a retrograde loop round the Earth, about 2ae long in the direction of motion and ae wide towards the Sun: for e = 0.1, 0.395 by 0.199 AU. The small circle is the Earth's Hill sphere, 0.010 AU in radius, inside which the Earth's gravity dominates the Sun's tide. Every loop lies far outside it. The loop is a difference between two ellipses with one period, and would be traced the same way if the Earth had no mass at all.

A moon the Earth does not hold

Seen from the Earth, the small asteroid Kamoʻoalewa circles the planet once a year, backwards, between forty and a hundred times as far away as the Moon. It is not a moon. It orbits the Sun, with the Earth's period and a slightly different eccentricity, and the loop is the difference between two ellipses — one the Earth would trace even with no mass at all. What the Earth's gravity does is subtler: it keeps the loop from drifting away.

gravitation · Lagrange points A shift in the time and a change in the length, a quarter-cycle apart. The transit timing shift and duration change of a planet of 0.5 Jupiter masses in a 287-day orbit, carrying a moon of 10 Earth masses at 20 planetary radii, against the moon's orbital phase at the moment of transit, for two cycles. The timing swings by ±42 minutes and the duration by ±10.1 minutes. The moon's period is 12.9 days. Timing is largest when the moon is farthest along the track, and duration when the moon is moving fastest along it, so they are in quadrature; a perturbing planet would produce nothing of that kind in the duration.

A moon read from how late and how long

A moon pulls its planet round their common centre, and at each transit the planet is somewhere slightly different along that small orbit, moving slightly differently. So the transit arrives early or late, and it lasts longer or shorter. The two effects depend on the moon in different ways and they run a quarter of a cycle apart. Neither alone says anything about the moon. Their ratio gives its period, which a series of transits sampled once an orbit cannot otherwise reach.

exoplanets · Transit timing

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Lagrange pointsJacobi constantRotating frameIrregular satellitesRestricted three-body problemInvariant manifoldOrbital stabilityRoche limitThree-body problemZero-velocity curveAliasingApsidal precession

All concepts