Intrinsic alignment — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Two parameters that lensing measures as one
A weak-lensing survey measures how much the shapes of distant galaxies are distorted by the matter in front of them, and that distortion depends on how much matter there is and on how clumpily it is arranged. The two enter as a product. What the survey determines is one number, and the disagreement between surveys and the microwave background is stated in that number because neither measures either quantity alone.
The shape a galaxy was given before it was lensed
Weak lensing assumes that galaxies point in random directions, so that a coherent stretch can only have been put there by the light's journey. The tidal field that set every galaxy's spin also stretched its shape — towards the very mass that lenses the galaxies behind it — and the resulting error is not noise but a signal of the opposite sign.
A spin that remembers the field and not its sign
Tidal torque theory says where a galaxy's spin should point, not only how large it should be. It points along the middle axis of the tidal field, it is exactly perpendicular to an ideal filament, and it is an even function of the field — so a map of spins can find the directions of the cosmic web and can never say which of them is collapsing.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Cosmic shearLarge-scale structurePhotometric redshiftSpin alignmentTidal tensorTidal torque theoryAngular momentumCorrelation functionDegeneracyGalaxy biasGaussian random fieldInertia tensor