Laplace–Lagrange theory — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
No planet has an eccentricity of its own
Strip the short-period terms out of the planetary equations and what is left is a linear system. Its eigenvectors are modes of the whole solar system, and the number a catalogue quotes for a planet's eccentricity turns out to be a reading of a clock rather than a property of the planet.
The bound that holds only in the linear theory
Laplace proved the planetary eccentricities bounded, and the proof is a proof about a linearised system with constant frequencies. One combination of those frequencies is nearly zero — and it is smaller than the terms the linearisation threw away, which is why the stability of the solar system is a probability rather than a theorem.
A denominator that emptied the inner belt
The eccentricity Jupiter and Saturn force on an asteroid is a fraction, and its denominator is the difference between the asteroid's own precession rate and one of the planets'. At two astronomical units that difference is zero. Where the zero sits depends on where Saturn is — and the belt's quiet orbits say Saturn did not take long to get there.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Proper elementsAngular momentum deficitForced eccentricitySecular resonanceSmall divisorApsidal precessionAsteroid beltAsteroid familyChaotic diffusionDisturbing functionEccentricityEigenfrequency