Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Small divisor — where it appears

A difference between two frequencies that appears in the denominator of a perturbation series and approaches zero near a resonance. Where it vanishes the forced response diverges, which is where the series fails and resonances empty regions of orbits.

Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The divisor is 0.129″/yr and the theory's own error is 0.24. Six frequencies of the secular solar system on one logarithmic axis, in arcseconds per year. The top two are the pair whose near-equality is the whole story: the perihelia of Mercury and Jupiter separate at 1.333″ a year, the nodes of Mercury and Venus at 1.462, and the difference of those two differences is 0.129 — a resonant argument that turns once every 10.0 million years. A term with that argument in the disturbing function acts in one direction for five million years at a stretch, which is what pumps Mercury's eccentricity, and it is the reason the inner solar system's Lyapunov time is what it is. The bottom three bars are why this figure exists. The divisor is smaller than the corrections the theory that computes it leaves out. Relativity contributes 0.4298″ a year to g₁ alone — the same 43 arcseconds a century that broke Newtonian gravity — which is 3.3 times the divisor; the fourth-order terms in the eccentricity that Laplace–Lagrange truncates come to about 0.24″, which is 1.8 times it; and the second-order solution computed on this page gets 0.35″, missing the published value by more than the value itself. A theory cannot bound what it cannot resolve. Laplace's proof that the eccentricities stay bounded is a proof about a system whose frequencies are constants, and the frequency that decides the question is not one.

The bound that holds only in the linear theory

Laplace proved the planetary eccentricities bounded, and the proof is a proof about a linearised system with constant frequencies. One combination of those frequencies is nearly zero — and it is smaller than the terms the linearisation threw away, which is why the stability of the solar system is a probability rather than a theorem.

orbits · Secular theory The eccentricity the planets force on an asteroid, and where it diverges. The forced eccentricity of a body in the inner Solar System against its semi-major axis, from the linear secular theory with all eight planets — its two giant-planet frequencies set to the measured 4.257 and 28.245 arcseconds a year — on a logarithmic axis: the largest value it reaches over the planetary cycles (solid) and its present value (dashed). Across most of the asteroid belt it is a few hundredths — 0.048 at 2.8 AU — the part of every asteroid's eccentricity that belongs to Jupiter and Saturn rather than to the asteroid. Near 2.04 AU it diverges: there the asteroid's own apsidal precession rate equals the frequency of the planetary mode dominated by Saturn, the denominator A − g₆ vanishes, and the theory's forced eccentricity goes to infinity. That is the ν₆ secular resonance. Real asteroids near it do not reach infinite eccentricity; they reach eccentricities large enough to cross the orbits of Mars and the Earth, and are removed. The location is for a body of low eccentricity and inclination; the full theory curves the resonance to larger distances at higher inclination, which is why the belt's inner edge is not a single number.

A denominator that emptied the inner belt

The eccentricity Jupiter and Saturn force on an asteroid is a fraction, and its denominator is the difference between the asteroid's own precession rate and one of the planets'. At two astronomical units that difference is zero. Where the zero sits depends on where Saturn is — and the belt's quiet orbits say Saturn did not take long to get there.

orbits · Secular theory Jupiter and Saturn trading a degree of longitude over nine centuries. Mean longitudes of Jupiter and Saturn in arcminutes, with their straight trends taken out and a 40-year smoothing applied, from a planar integration of the Sun, Jupiter and Saturn from their elements at the year 2000. Jupiter swings ±20′ and Saturn ±50′, in opposite senses, with a period of about 870 years. Comparing Ptolemy's positions with those of his own day, Kepler could not fit one mean motion to both, and by 1676 Halley reported Jupiter gaining and Saturn losing. Before 1785 that looked as if the Solar System were unstable; the curve shows that it is a very long period.

A term too small to keep that a denominator kept

Every planetary theory is an expansion, and the order of its terms is meant to say which can be dropped. In the 1770s the largest unexplained motion in the Solar System, Jupiter speeding up and Saturn slowing down by a degree over centuries, came from a term that the ordering called negligible. Five of Saturn's orbits nearly match two of Jupiter's, and that one near-match divides a tiny third-order coefficient twice by a tiny frequency. An integration of the three bodies shows the swap directly, and shows what Laplace saw: it reverses every nine centuries.

orbits · Perturbations

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Laplace–Lagrange theoryProper elementsSecular resonanceAngular momentum deficitApsidal precessionAsteroid beltChaotic diffusionDisturbing functionEigenfrequencyForced eccentricityGreat inequalityInvariable plane

All concepts