Concept

Light time — where it appears

The interval a signal spends travelling from a source to the observer, during which both have moved. Correcting for it is what separates where a body is from where it is seen, and it is the largest term in any comparison between an ephemeris and an observation.

Named by 4 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

An eight-hour pass, and a 351 m s⁻¹ sinusoid that is the whole of the angle. Above: the range rate a two-way Doppler measurement returns over one pass from Goldstone, for a spacecraft receding at 14.6 km s⁻¹. Nothing here is an angle. The measurement is the fractional shift of a carrier the spacecraft coherently turned around and sent back, and its interpretation is that the distance is changing at some rate. Below: the same data with the spacecraft's own smooth signature removed. What is left is a sinusoid of exactly one cycle per day — the station's own motion, carried east at 379 metres a second by the rotation of the Earth, projected onto the line of sight. Its amplitude is that speed times cos δ and returns a declination of 22.0°; its zero crossing is the moment the spacecraft passed the meridian and returns the right ascension. The Earth's rotation is the interferometer. With Doppler good to 0.05 mm s⁻¹ at a 60-second cadence, 480 samples fit that amplitude to 0.003 mm s⁻¹ and the declination to 23 nanoradians — which is 4.7 milliarcseconds, from an instrument with no image plane and no angular resolution of any kind. What the picture cannot show is the part that makes this hard in practice: the spacecraft's own signature is not a straight line but a trajectory with unmodelled accelerations in it, and separating a slow non-gravitational force from a slow drift in the angles is the whole art of the fit.

A position measured from a frequency

A spacecraft is unresolvable and unreachable, and everything known about where it is comes from two scalars — a round-trip light time and a Doppler shift. Neither is an angle. The orbit solution returns two angles anyway, because the antenna is bolted to a rotating planet.

spaceflight · Radiometric navigation
Three passes, and the fourth is below the noise. How far the position is still wrong after each pass of the light-time iteration, for five targets, on a logarithmic scale of kilometres. The first pass uses the body's position now and is wrong by exactly the distance the body travels while its light is in transit — 6254 kilometres for Mars near opposition, which is about twenty-five arcseconds and larger than any residual in an ephemeris fit. Each further pass multiplies the error by the body's speed divided by the speed of light, so the lines are straight and their slopes are that ratio and nothing else. Three passes take every one of these below a metre, which is why the loop in an ephemeris code has a fixed trip count rather than a convergence test. The same argument run backwards is why the correction cannot be applied to the observation instead: the direction light arrived from is what the observation is, and the position it corresponds to is not known until the body's orbit is.

Where a planet is and where it is seen

An ephemeris is fitted to observations, and no observation is of a position. It is of a direction light arrived from, at a time that is not the time the light left, bent by a Sun that is nowhere near the line of sight. Three corrections stand between the two, and all three are larger than the residuals.

orbits · Ephemerides
The last correction: accurate if late, cheap if early. For a spacecraft approaching a moon at 6 km/s with a 30 km aim error left by navigation from the Earth, which locates the moon by camera to 20 microradians and acts an hour after its last image: the error remaining at the flyby after one final correction (blue, km) and that correction's cost (orange, m/s), against how long before the flyby it is made, all on logarithmic scales. The error falls in proportion to the time-to-go, because the moon is seen from closer, until it meets a floor: 3.1 km from how well the limb of a Europa-sized moon can be fitted once it fills the camera's view, with the burn's own two-per-cent error, 0.6 km, beneath it. The cost rises as one over the time-to-go, because the same error has to be removed in less time. The floor is reached 6.2 hours out, and a correction later than that costs more and buys nothing. A correction a day out costs 0.35 m/s and delivers 10.8 km; one six hours out, 1.4 m/s for 3.2 km. With 1 m/s to spend, the best is 4.2 km, at 8.7 hours out.

An aim bought with the last day of the approach

A spacecraft that photographs the moon it is approaching can aim its flyby far more precisely than the ground can tell it to, because it sees the target from closer every hour. But each hour closer leaves less time for a correction to act, so every kilometre of aim is bought with propellant — and below a few kilometres the camera stops helping at all, because a moon that fills the view can be located only as well as its limb can be fitted. For a small craft with a metre a second to spend, the aim comes out at four kilometres, set by geometry and not by the antenna.

spaceflight · Gravity assist
A reflector made worse so the light lands where it is wanted. The intensity returned by a 3.8 cm fused-silica corner cube against angle from the exact retro-direction, on a logarithmic scale relative to a perfect cube's peak, at 532 nm. A perfect cube returns an Airy pattern whose central lobe is 17 microradians in radius. Offsetting each of its three dihedral angles by 1.25 arcseconds splits the return into six beams, each from a sixth of the face, deflected by (4√6/3)·n·ε = 29 µrad. In the band of offsets a LAGEOS station sees, 32–38 µrad (shaded), the spoiled cube returns 10 times as much light as the perfect one, along the direction of each lobe. Each lobe is drawn here as the Airy pattern of a circular aperture of a sixth of the area, which is an approximation to the true sector shape.

A reflector built wrong so the light comes home

A corner-cube reflector sends light straight back the way it came — in its own frame. On a satellite crossing the sky the return is aberrated by twice the satellite's sideways speed over the speed of light, fifty microradians for a low orbit, which is further than a small perfect cube spreads its light. So the cubes on geodetic satellites are made imperfect on purpose, their angles offset by about an arcsecond to throw the returning beam out to where the telescope will be.

sky · Aberration

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

AberrationRangingApparent placeAstrometric placeAutonomous navigationThe B-planeBarycentric coordinate timeCoherent transponderDeclinationDeep-space networkDelta-DORDiffraction

All concepts