Concept

The B-plane — where it appears

The plane through a target planet perpendicular to a spacecraft's incoming velocity far from the planet, in which the aim point is specified. Two coordinates in it fix the flyby's closest approach and orientation, and navigation targets them.

Named by 6 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The aim point and the miss distance are the same number far out and nothing like it close in. Periapsis distance against aim point for a hyperbolic approach to Jupiter at v∞ = 5.6 km/s, both in planet radii. The diagonal is where the two would be equal — where gravity did nothing — and the curve falls below it everywhere, by more the closer in the aim is. A trajectory aimed at 10.68 radii grazes the surface, because gravitational focusing means the planet's effective size is √(1 + v_esc²/v∞²) times its radius. The slope of this curve is what a navigation team cares about: it is 0.208 at an aim of 12 radii and 0.936 at 150, so the same correction manoeuvre changes the periapsis distance by 4.5 times as much at one end of the range as at the other, while changing B by exactly the same amount at both; far outside this plot, where focusing has run out, it reaches 1.000 and the two numbers become the same one. That is why the aim point is the coordinate a manoeuvre is quoted in, why an error ellipse is published in the B-plane, and why the turn angle — 2 arctan(μ/Bv∞²), 156.0° at 12 radii and 77.8° at 70 — is thought of as a function of B rather than of anything the spacecraft does.

Aiming at a plane instead of at a planet

A spacecraft arriving at a planet is not aimed at a periapsis distance. It is aimed at a point in a plane perpendicular to its own incoming asymptote, because that is the one coordinate in which the miss distance responds linearly to a correction — and every navigation product ever published for a flyby is written in it.

orbits · Hyperbolic orbits
How far a small error at departure moves the arrival at Mars. The distance by which a craft on the Hohmann transfer from the Earth's orbit to Mars's misses its aim point at the nominal arrival time, against an error in its departure speed, on logarithmic axes, integrated numerically for the 259-day flight. An error along the direction of motion (solid) moves the arrival by 76 km for every millimetre a second; one across it (dashed) by 23 km. The relation is linear over the whole range drawn: a metre a second at departure — the precision of a good launch — is 76 thousand kilometres at Mars, several times the planet's own radius and a thousand times what a landing needs. The ratio is the corresponding element of the state transition matrix, and it is the number every navigation plan is built around.

A millimetre a second at launch, seventy-six kilometres at Mars

A craft on its way to Mars arrives seventy-six kilometres from where it was aimed for every millimetre a second its departure speed was wrong. No launch is that good, so no trajectory is flown as designed; it is flown as corrected, by Newton's method run on the matrix that says how the arrival depends on the departure — which doubles its correct digits at every step and makes a two-body sketch into a real trajectory in two iterations.

spaceflight · Patched conics
Each kilometre of aim error, turned into a velocity error. The error in the outgoing velocity per kilometre of error in where a spacecraft passes a moon, in metres per second per kilometre, against the flyby altitude on a logarithmic scale, for the four large moons of Jupiter at an encounter speed of 6 km/s. The flyby turns the velocity through an angle δ with tan(δ/2) = aₕ/b, where b is the aim point's distance from the moon's centre and aₕ = μ/v∞²; missing the aim by a kilometre along b changes δ, and missing it by a kilometre across b rotates the plane of the turn, and both move the outgoing velocity by about 2v∞aₕ/b² per kilometre. At 300 km above Ganymede that is 0.32 m/s per km along and 0.32 across. The closer and more massive the flyby, the more it turns — and the more it amplifies whatever error the approach carried.

A flyby that multiplies its own aiming error

A close flyby of a moon turns a spacecraft's path by ten degrees for nothing, and it turns every error in the aim with it. A kilometre of miss at three hundred kilometres above Ganymede becomes a third of a metre per second of velocity error, and a week later two hundred kilometres of miss at the next moon. A tour of flybys is an amplifier that must be re-zeroed after every pass, and whether a small spacecraft can use one in place of an engine burn depends on how many kilometres it can aim to.

spaceflight · Gravity assist
The plane change wants a gentle flyby. The lowest inclination to the Moon's orbit that one flyby can leave a spacecraft in, against the flyby's height above the Moon, for a spacecraft arriving from an orbit of perigee 6678 km inclined 51.6°: with no constraint on where the new orbit goes (dashed), and requiring the new perigee to lie between the atmosphere and 20,000 km, so that the spacecraft comes back to the Earth (solid). Unconstrained, any flyby closer than tens of thousands of kilometres can bring the inclination to nearly zero. But a close flyby turns the velocity so far that it also flings the spacecraft outward, and no aim point brings it back near the Earth; only from about 9,500 km up does a returning orbit become possible. Between that height and about 18,000 km the flyby can both bring the spacecraft back and leave its orbit nearly in the Moon's plane; further out still, the turn is too small to remove the inclination. The useful flyby is a gentle one, in a window.

A plane change borrowed from the Moon

Turning an orbit's plane by the engine costs a fixed fraction of the spacecraft's speed, which is why it is done as far from the Earth as possible. Farther still, at the Moon's distance, a spacecraft is moving so slowly that the Moon can turn its velocity through tens of degrees for nothing — but a flyby close enough to turn it hard also flings it outward, and the useful flyby is a gentle one, in a window of heights the arithmetic picks out.

spaceflight · Plane change
The velocities that decide whether Jupiter keeps a visitor. A velocity diagram in Jupiter's orbital plane, in km/s, with the Sun's frame at the origin. Jupiter moves at 13.06 km/s (the arrow along the axis). The dashed circle is the escape speed from the Sun at Jupiter's distance, 18.47 km/s: a body whose heliocentric velocity ends inside it is bound. A visitor arriving with 3 km/s to spare reaches Jupiter's distance at 18.71 km/s, just outside the circle; here its velocity makes 150° with Jupiter's, so it meets Jupiter at 30.7 km/s. A flyby keeps that relative speed and only turns it, by at most 81° for a pass grazing the cloud tops — so the possible outcomes lie on the drawn arc of a circle of radius 30.7 km/s about Jupiter's velocity. The part of the arc inside the escape circle (darker) is the set of flybys that leave the visitor bound to the Sun; the slowest outcome is 17.7 km/s. Capture needs the visitor to arrive barely faster than escape, so that the turn of its velocity relative to Jupiter can take the small excess away.

Jupiter keeps only the visitors already nearly bound

An interstellar object passing Jupiter can lose enough speed to stay, but one flyby can only turn the visitor's velocity relative to the planet, never shorten it, and the turn removes at most a few kilometres a second from its speed around the Sun. So capture is common for visitors that arrive with less than a kilometre a second to spare and almost impossible for the speeds the three known visitors had. A census of the slow tail of the interstellar population, and the orbits a capture leaves — more than a third of them backwards — follow from the same arithmetic.

orbits · Hyperbolic orbits
The last correction: accurate if late, cheap if early. For a spacecraft approaching a moon at 6 km/s with a 30 km aim error left by navigation from the Earth, which locates the moon by camera to 20 microradians and acts an hour after its last image: the error remaining at the flyby after one final correction (blue, km) and that correction's cost (orange, m/s), against how long before the flyby it is made, all on logarithmic scales. The error falls in proportion to the time-to-go, because the moon is seen from closer, until it meets a floor: 3.1 km from how well the limb of a Europa-sized moon can be fitted once it fills the camera's view, with the burn's own two-per-cent error, 0.6 km, beneath it. The cost rises as one over the time-to-go, because the same error has to be removed in less time. The floor is reached 6.2 hours out, and a correction later than that costs more and buys nothing. A correction a day out costs 0.35 m/s and delivers 10.8 km; one six hours out, 1.4 m/s for 3.2 km. With 1 m/s to spend, the best is 4.2 km, at 8.7 hours out.

An aim bought with the last day of the approach

A spacecraft that photographs the moon it is approaching can aim its flyby far more precisely than the ground can tell it to, because it sees the target from closer every hour. But each hour closer leaves less time for a correction to act, so every kilometre of aim is bought with propellant — and below a few kilometres the camera stops helping at all, because a moon that fills the view can be located only as well as its limb can be fitted. For a small craft with a metre a second to spend, the aim comes out at four kilometres, set by geometry and not by the antenna.

spaceflight · Gravity assist

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Gravity assistA trajectory-correction manoeuvreHyperbolic excess speedPatched conicsTurn angleOptical navigationAim pointAutonomous navigationDelivery ellipseΔvDifferential correctionEntry corridor

All concepts