Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Low-thrust transfer — where it appears

Propulsion supplying a small acceleration continuously rather than a large one briefly, as an ion engine does. The trajectory becomes a slow outward spiral instead of a pair of impulses, and it costs more velocity change than the impulsive transfer while costing far less propellant.

Named by 10 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The same thrust is worth 2.08 times more at perigee, and out of plane it is worth nothing at all. The rate of change of the semi-major axis under a unit acceleration in each of the three directions, against position around an orbit of eccentricity 0.35, from Gauss's variational equations. The along-track curve carries the factor p/r = 1 + e cos f and therefore peaks at perigee, where the same impulse is worth 2.08 times what it is worth at apogee — the whole of the Oberth effect, arriving as a term in a differential equation rather than as an argument about kinetic energy. The radial curve is antisymmetric about apoapsis and integrates to exactly zero over a revolution: pushing outwards for half an orbit and being pushed back for the other half changes the energy by nothing, which is checked here by quadrature and comes out at -9.0e-18. And the out-of-plane response is identically zero at every point of the orbit, because W is perpendicular to the velocity and does no work. An orbital plane can be rotated without touching the energy, and that is why a plane change is so expensive: none of what is spent goes anywhere useful.

Which direction moves which element

Resolve a small force into three components and Gauss's equations say exactly what each one does. The out-of-plane component can rotate an orbit and can never change its energy; the along-track component owns the semi-major axis outright and is worth more at perigee than at apogee by a factor that is pure geometry.

orbits · Perturbations 20% more Δv, spread over 26 revolutions. A continuous tangential thrust from a circular orbit of radius 1 to one of radius 6.611, integrated from dr/dt = 2r·a_T/v with the primary's GM set to 1. The spiral costs |v₁ − v₂| = 0.6111 in units of the inner circular speed, against 0.5076 for the two-impulse Hohmann drawn on the same pair of circles — 20.4% dearer, and the excess is exactly the Oberth advantage the impulsive transfer collects by burning where the vehicle is moving fastest and the spiral throws away by burning everywhere. The revolution count follows from the thrust level and nothing else, and the count drawn here is not a real one: 26 revolutions at an acceleration of 0.0015 of the inner orbit's own gravity, chosen so that the spiral can be seen at all. A real electric transfer runs nearer 3·10⁻⁵, which is 1,296 revolutions of a curve no page could resolve. Halving the thrust doubles both the turns and the time and leaves the Δv exactly where it is. That separation is the whole reason low thrust is flown at all — the Δv is worse and the propellant is not, because the exponential in the rocket equation is over Δv/(g₀Isp) and an electric engine's Isp is the larger number by more than this 20%.

The transfer that costs more the gentler it is

A continuous spiral from low orbit to geostationary needs a fifth more velocity change than the two-burn transfer, because the thrust is never at the one place it is worth most. It is flown anyway, and by a wide margin — because the exponential in the rocket equation changed sides.

spaceflight · Low-thrust transfer One square root that raises the orbit and turns it. The velocity budget from a 300 km circular orbit to geostationary, against the plane change carried out along the way. Edelbaum's closed form — √(v₁² + v₂² − 2v₁v₂cos(½πΔi)) with Δi in radians — puts the whole continuous manoeuvre in one square root, and at Δi = 0 it collapses to |v₁ − v₂| = 4.651 km/s, which is the spiral's cost with no plane change in it. The two-impulse curve puts its rotation into the circularisation burn at apoapsis, where the vehicle is moving at 1.608 km/s and a rotation is cheap. At 28.5° the continuous transfer costs 5.951 km/s against the impulsive 4.256 — the plane change adds 1.300 to one and 0.363 to the other. That is the opposite of the usual claim that low thrust turns for free. It turns continuously, which is not the same thing: the gain is that the propellant is not the budget, and the Δv is worse here as it is everywhere else.

One square root that raises the orbit and turns it

Edelbaum put the plane change inside the same radical as the raise, and the half-pi in its cosine is the whole result — a continuous turn costs π/2 times an impulsive one below 140° and less above it.

spaceflight · Low-thrust transfer There is a best exhaust speed, and the calendar picks it. Payload fraction against exhaust speed for a 11 km/s mission, at three thrusting durations, with a power plant of 0.025 kilograms per watt of jet power. The vehicle is payload plus power plant plus propellant and the arithmetic is one line: λ = e^(−Δv/c) − (αc²/2t)(1 − e^(−Δv/c)), the first term the rocket equation and the second the mass of the machine that makes the jet. They pull opposite ways. A slow exhaust burns propellant; a fast one needs power, and the power per newton rises in proportion to c, so the plant's mass rises as c². Neither end is where anybody builds, and the optimum is 3,211 s over 200 days, 6,523 s over 700 days, 11,424 s over 2000 days — the same mission, the same Δv, and the best engine for it changes by a factor of 3.6 depending only on how long there is to do it. A gridded ion engine at 3,100 seconds sits at 30.4 km/s, which suits the shortest of these and is slow for the longest. What the curve cannot show is that α is not a constant either: a solar array's mass per watt falls as the fourth power of the distance from the Sun, so the same vehicle is a different point on this plot at Mars and at Jupiter.

The engine is chosen by the calendar

A chemical stage's exhaust speed is fixed by chemistry. An electric one's is a dial, and turning it up costs power — so there is a best setting, and it is decided by how long the mission has rather than by how far it is going.

spaceflight · Low-thrust transfer A sail has to be tilted, and tilting it throws most of it away. The thrust on an ideal flat sail, resolved into the orbit frame, against the angle between the sail's normal and the sunline. The force is along the normal and goes as cos²α — one cosine for the area the sail presents to the light, one for the momentum the reflection returns along the normal — so the radial component goes as cos³α and the transverse one as cos²α sin α. A sun-facing sail has no transverse push at all. Its thrust is purely outward and falls as 1/r² exactly as solar gravity does, so it merely replaces μ with μ(1 − β): the orbit stays the same conic with a smaller central mass, and the vehicle raises nothing. Every manoeuvre a sail makes it makes by tilting, and the transverse push peaks at 35.26° — arctan(1/√2), differentiated rather than tabulated — where it is 0.385 of the face-on force, or 2/(3√3). Two thirds of the thrust is the price of pointing any of it somewhere useful. The lightness number β is the sail's whole specification, radiation pressure and gravity both falling as 1/r² so their ratio is a constant: IKAROS, 2010 at 1607 g/m² gives β = 9.5e-4; LightSail 2, 2019 at 156 g/m² gives β = 9.8e-3; a 5 µm film with no structure at 7 g/m² gives β = 0.219, against the 1.53 g/m² at which the Sun would push as hard as it pulls. What no figure here can show is the thing a sail actually has instead of a rocket equation, which is nothing: the exponential that limits every other vehicle is absent, and what limits this one is a structure that has to hold a square kilometre of film flat.

A drive with no rocket equation

Radiation pressure and solar gravity both fall as the inverse square, so their ratio is a constant of the vehicle. A sun-facing sail therefore only rescales the central mass — it has to be tilted to do anything, and the best tilt throws away sixty-two per cent of the thrust.

spaceflight · Low-thrust transfer Two ways out of a transfer orbit. The eccentricity against the semi-major axis of a spacecraft spiralling out from a geostationary transfer orbit — perigee 300 km up, apogee at geostationary height — under a continuous thrust of 0.2 millimetres a second squared, integrated through hundreds of revolutions, for two steering laws. Thrust always along the velocity (red) raises the orbit efficiently but leaves its shape almost unchanged, reaching the geostationary semi-major axis after 64 days still with an eccentricity of 0.59 — an orbit swinging between 17,000 and 67,000 km. A law that points the thrust to reduce a weighted distance from the target in both elements (blue) circularises as it raises, and reaches a circular geostationary orbit in 129 days.

The thrust that rounds an orbit turns once a revolution

An electric engine pushes gently for months, and the obvious way to point it — along the velocity — raises an orbit as fast as possible and leaves its shape almost untouched. Starting from an elongated transfer orbit, that is the wrong job. Rounding the orbit off needs the thrust forward at apogee, backward at perigee and sideways in between, a full turn of the thrust vector every revolution, and the law that does it can be written down from the equations for how each element changes.

spaceflight · Low-thrust transfer The cost of turning an orbit, against how much of each revolution the engine runs. The velocity spent per unit of inclination change, relative to an instantaneous turn at a node, when a small out-of-plane thrust is applied only in arcs centred on the two nodes, against the half-width of each arc (blue). Thrusting all the time costs π/2, 1.571; arcs of ±60° cost 1.209; ±30°, 1.047; ±10°, 1.0051. The price is time: the engine is off for the rest of each orbit, and the turn takes longer by the inverse of the duty times the efficiency (orange, right-hand scale) — relative to a push that was always fully effective, 1.57 times as long for continuous thrust, 3.14 for ±30°, 9.0 for ±10°. Most of Edelbaum's penalty is spent in the quarter-orbits near the points where a push turns the node instead of the plane.

A plane turned only where turning is cheap

A low-thrust engine that turns an orbit's plane continuously pays π/2 times what an impulse at the node would cost, because for half of every revolution it is pushing where a push mostly swings the node instead of tilting the plane. Thrusting only in arcs about the nodes recovers almost all of that: arcs of ±30 degrees cost five per cent more than an impulse, at the price of taking twice as long. It is how geostationary satellites hold their planes, and it stops working for large turns, where a chord is shorter than any arc.

spaceflight · Plane change A thrust that leans out of the plane at the nodes. The yaw of the thrust — its angle out of the orbit's plane — against the argument of latitude round one revolution, at the start, half-way through and near the end of a low-thrust transfer from a 7.726 km/s orbit to geostationary speed (3.075 km/s) that also removes 28.5° of inclination. Edelbaum's law (dashed) holds the yaw at one size through each revolution, switching sign at the antinodes. The optimal law (solid) has tan β proportional to |cos u|: the thrust lies in the plane at the antinodes, where out-of-plane thrust would mostly swing the node, and leans out furthest at the nodes, where it turns the plane best — 44° half-way through the transfer, against Edelbaum's 34° all round. Raising the orbit is equally efficient anywhere, so the thrust never needs to coast: the in-plane share fills exactly the parts of the orbit where turning is poor.

A turn spread where the climb leaves room

An electric spacecraft spiralling from low orbit to geostationary has to remove its launch inclination on the way, and the classic steering law tilts its thrust out of the plane by the same angle all the way round each orbit. But out-of-plane thrust turns the plane only near the nodes, while in-plane thrust raises the orbit equally well everywhere. Letting the tilt follow the nodes — leaning hard where turning works and lying flat where it does not — saves 150 metres a second on a transfer from Cape Canaveral, with no coasting, because the climb fills exactly the parts of each orbit where the turn would be wasted.

spaceflight · Plane change Where on the orbit the turning is done, and where the shadow falls. How effectively out-of-plane thrust turns a circular orbit's plane at each point round the orbit, measured from the ascending node: it goes as the absolute value of the cosine of that angle, greatest at the two nodes and zero halfway between them. The shaded bands are the Earth's shadow on an orbit 6,378 km up with the Sun in the orbit's plane, 60 degrees of the circle, placed once over a node and once between the nodes. Over the node the shadow switches the engine off where it would have done the most turning, and the orbit loses 25% of its turning; between the nodes it switches the engine off where it was doing little, and the loss is 7%.

A turn that costs more when the shadow sits on the node

An electric spacecraft turning its orbit's plane does most of the turning near the two nodes, where a push out of the plane tilts it most. Its engine runs on sunlight and stops in the Earth's shadow, and the shadow covers a sixth of the orbit wherever it happens to fall. When it falls on a node it removes a quarter of each orbit's turning, and a law that concentrates its thrust at the nodes loses half. The node drifts one way and the Sun the other, so the shadow slides across the nodes over weeks — and a transfer's length depends on the day it starts.

spaceflight · Plane change How hard a hovering spacecraft pulls an asteroid. The velocity change a spacecraft hovering beside a 200-m asteroid gives it in a year by gravity alone, in millimetres per second, against the hovering distance from the asteroid's centre in asteroid radii, for spacecraft of 5 t, 20 t, 50 t. The pull depends on the spacecraft's mass and the distance, not on the asteroid's mass. A 20-tonne tractor at 1.5 radii gives 1.9 mm/s a year; at 3 radii, a quarter of that. Closer is better, and the limit on how close is set by the exhaust: inside the shaded region the engines would have to point so steeply outward to keep their 20° plumes off the surface that holding station costs more than the pull is worth.

A tow with no rope

A spacecraft parked beside an asteroid pulls it by gravity alone, with a force set by the spacecraft's mass and its distance and nothing else. Twenty tonnes hovering a hundred and fifty metres from the centre of a two-hundred-metre asteroid moves it by two millimetres a second in a year. That is the gentlest engine there is, and its limit is not the pull but the exhaust: the spacecraft must thrust away from the rock to stay put without blasting it, and the angle that takes decides how close it can hover.

spaceflight · Low-thrust transfer

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Electric propulsionΔvSpecific impulseInclinationOrbital transferPlane changeArgument of latitudeGeostationary orbitOberth effectRocket equationAscending nodeGauss's variational equations

All concepts