Concept

Porkchop plot — where it appears

A contour map of transfer cost against departure and arrival date, whose closed contours give the plot its name. Each pixel is one Lambert solve, and the basins are the launch windows, which repeat at the synodic period.

Named by 6 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

5 transfers through the same two points in the same 1400 days. Time of flight against semi-major axis for every transfer through two points 135° apart at 1 and 1.524 AU, with the revolution count running from 0 to 2. Each count contributes two branches, and for N ≥ 1 the pair folds: the time has a minimum at a = 1.2426 AU for one revolution — only 2.2 per cent above the minimum-energy value of 1.2161, which is why the horizontal axis is the excess over that value and logarithmic — so a flight time above it is met twice and below it not at all. Reading the crossings of the 1400-day line off the drawn curves gives 5 of them — 0 revs high, 1 rev low, 1 rev high, 2 revs low, 2 revs high — which is 2N + 1 with N = 2, and the count is a property of the time rather than of the geometry. That is the practical content: a root-finder started from a single guess returns one of these 5 and gives no sign that the other 4 exist, and the cheapest of them is often not the one nearest the guess.

One time of flight and five ways round

Lambert's theorem says two positions and an interval fix the transfer. Allow the transfer to complete whole revolutions and that stops being true: the flight time folds, one number admits five arcs, and the cheapest of them is usually not the one a solver started nearest to.

orbits · Lambert's problem

The cost of going to Mars, against when to leave and how long to take. Contours of departure energy C₃ over a grid of 64 × 56 solved Lambert problems: each point is a departure date, a flight time, and the unique single-revolution conic that connects the two planets between them. The cheapest transfer on this grid costs 5.1 km²/s², leaving in Mar 2001 with a flight time of 220 days, against 8.7 for the idealised Hohmann transfer between circular orbits of the same radii. A launch window is a region on this plane, not a moment, and its shape is what a launch period is negotiated against.

Two dates decide a mission

Given where a spacecraft leaves from, where it is going, and how long it may take, there is exactly one orbit joining the two. Solving that problem over every pair of departure and arrival dates produces a contour map, and the shape of the contours is what a launch window actually is.

spaceflight · Launch windows

Windows every 780 days, costing between 5 and 13. The cheapest departure energy available in each of 8 consecutive launch opportunities, each found by solving a grid of Lambert problems around the window and taking the minimum. Opportunities recur every 780 days — the synodic period of Earth and Mars, which is exact and which is why the interval between missions is always about twenty-six months. Their cost is not periodic on that interval. The cheapest here is 5.0 km²/s² and the dearest 12.9, a factor of 2.59, and the pattern repeats on a period of about fifteen years rather than on the synodic one. The cause is Mars's eccentricity of 0.093: a transfer that arrives near Mars's perihelion has less distance to cover and meets a faster-moving planet, and whether an opportunity does that depends on where Mars is in its own orbit — which drifts relative to the synodic cycle by a fixed amount each time and comes back into phase after seven windows. In launch mass the factor is larger than it looks: departure energy enters the rocket equation through an exponential, so a C₃ of 13 rather than 5 costs roughly 1.08 times the propellant at departure.

The window that comes back and the cost that does not

Launch opportunities to Mars recur every 780 days exactly, because that is the synodic period and a synodic period is arithmetic. What they cost does not repeat on that interval at all — the cheapest window is a factor of two and a half below the dearest, and the pattern comes back every fifteen years rather than every two.

spaceflight · Launch windows $The same porkchop with Mars's orbit tilted, and the ridge that appears. Contours of departure energy C₃ for transfers from the Earth to Mars, over departure date and flight time, with Mars's orbit inclined by its real 1.85° to the ecliptic and every point a solved three-dimensional Lambert problem. The dashed line is where the transfer angle is exactly 180°. Along it the contours pile up into a ridge reaching C₃ of 346 km²/s² and more, against 7.9 at the cheapest point: a transfer half-way round the Sun has to lie in a plane through the Sun and two nearly opposite points, and reaching a target a fraction of a degree out of the ecliptic tilts that plane towards the pole. The ridge splits the plot into two basins — Type I transfers, less than half-way round, below and to the left, and Type II, more than half-way, above — and the cheapest transfers sit in one basin or the other, never on the line between them.$

A wall across the porkchop

Draw the cost of going to Mars with Mars's orbit in the Earth's plane and the porkchop plot is a smooth pair of basins. Tilt Mars's orbit by its real 1.85 degrees and a wall appears between them, hundreds of times higher than the valley floor, along the line where the transfer goes exactly half-way round the Sun. The wall is a plane change forced by geometry, its height changes from one launch window to the next, and a single burn half-way to Mars removes it.

spaceflight · Launch windows

Lambert's time of flight in the semi-major axis and in Lancaster and Blanchard's variable. The non-dimensional time of flight T = t√(2μ/s³) of the transfer between radii 1 and 1.524 through 135 degrees, against two variables that label the same family of orbits. Left: against the semi-major axis in units of the minimum-energy ellipse's. The family is two curves — the fast branch, which passes the empty focus on one side, and the slow branch, on the other — joined at a = aₘ with T = 1.566, where both have a vertical tangent: the time changes infinitely fast with the semi-major axis there, and every a above aₘ corresponds to two times. Right: against x, the variable of Lancaster and Blanchard, in which a = aₘ/(1 − x²). The same family is one smooth, decreasing curve through T = 1.566 at x = 0 to the parabolic time 0.662 at x = 1, with no tangent vertical and every time given by exactly one x. Nothing about the orbits differs between the panels; only the label on them does.

The variable that makes Lambert's problem easy

Written in the semi-major axis, the time-of-flight equation has two branches joined by a vertical tangent, and a solver near the join struggles. Written in a variable Lancaster and Blanchard chose in 1969, it is one smooth curve — and every trajectory library now solves it that way.

orbits · Lambert's problem

The wall sells inclination at the dearest price

Transfers to Mars that go almost exactly half-way round the Sun are forced into planes tilted steeply out of the ecliptic, which is why they form a wall of expensive dates across every launch chart. A mission that wanted to leave the ecliptic could use the wall on purpose. It would be buying inclination at the Earth's orbital speed — the dearest place to buy it — and the routes that reach the Sun's poles have always gone somewhere slower to make the turn.

spaceflight · Launch windows

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Lambert's problem Launch window Time of flight Characteristic energy Departure energy Hohmann transfer Minimum-energy transfer Plane change Root finding Synodic period Transfer orbit Bifurcation

All concepts