Rotation curve — where it appears
Named by 13 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
A rotation curve that refuses to fall
Beyond the edge of a galaxy's light there is nothing left to enclose, so the orbital speed should fall away as the inverse square root of radius. It does not fall at all, and the shape of that refusal says the missing mass arrives at a constant rate for as far out as anyone can measure.
Three mass models that fit the same curve
A rotation curve is one function of radius and it is fitted with three components, only one of which is known. The stellar disc's contribution scales with a mass-to-light ratio nobody measures, and whatever the disc does not supply the dark halo does — so a family of models reproduces the same curve exactly, and choosing among them is a convention rather than a measurement.
One velocity and two distances
Inside the Sun's orbit a line of sight crosses each galactocentric radius twice, and the two crossings have identical radial velocities. So a cloud's velocity gives two candidate distances, near and far, differing by a factor — and nothing about the velocity says which, though the choice decides whether the object is ordinary or extraordinary.
The speed a line width stands in for
A galaxy does not have a rotation speed. It has a rotation curve, rising in the smallest galaxies and peaking early in the largest, and the Tully–Fisher relation is fitted to whichever single number is read off it. Build galaxies with the relation placed in their outer speed and read four other speeds from the same curves, and each gives a shallower or looser relation — which is why the choice of speed is a statement about where the relation lives.
A disc that turns slower than its mass requires
The star-forming discs of ten billion years ago were not the thin, cold, orderly discs of today. Their gas moved randomly at tens of kilometres a second, and that motion is a pressure that holds up part of each disc, so it turns more slowly than its mass alone would require. Read those rotation speeds as if rotation did all the work and the Tully–Fisher relation tilts and scatters as if galaxies had evolved, when what differs is how much of their weight is carried by disorder.
The ratio that is not √2
Escape speed is exactly √2 times circular speed at every distance from a point mass, and the Sun's own escape speed from the Galaxy is 2.3 times its orbital speed. The excess is not an error in either number. It is a measurement of the mass that lies outside the Sun's orbit, which pulls on nothing and holds everything.
The halo a galaxy drags inward
The cusp that dark-matter simulations predict is a halo with no galaxy in it. When gas cools and settles into a disc at the centre, the dark matter is pulled in after it, and a quantity conserved on slowly changing orbits says by how much. In a large disc galaxy the pull triples the dark matter at the centre and multiplies tenfold the energy needed to dig a core; in a dwarf it barely registers.
Inside a ring the pull points outward
A hollow sphere exerts no force on anything inside it, and the proof is a pair of cones whose areas grow exactly as fast as gravity weakens. Cut the sphere down to a ring and the arcs grow only as the distance, the nearer side wins, and a planet set in the middle of a rigid ring falls into it within a handful of orbits — which is why Saturn's rings cannot be solid, and why a flat galaxy spins faster than its own enclosed mass allows.
One acceleration, and every galaxy's missing mass
Plot the acceleration measured at each radius of a rotation curve against the acceleration its stars and gas would produce there, for every galaxy at once, and the points fall on a single curve. Where the discrepancy begins is set not by a radius or a mass but by an acceleration.
A history the rotation curve absorbs
Whether the Milky Way's dark halo was pulled inward by its disc changes the dark matter at the Sun by half again — if the halo is taken from a simulation. Fit it to the Galaxy's own rotation instead, and the history drops out at the Sun's radius and survives only near the centre. The local density that detection experiments depend on is set by the disc's mass, not by the halo's past.
A disc weighed by how far its stars climb
The rotation curve cannot say how much of a galaxy's speed belongs to its disc, because any split between disc and halo fits it equally well. The stars' motions perpendicular to the disc can, with no halo in the argument at all — and when that was done for thirty face-on spirals the discs came out light. But the vertical weighing needs the disc's thickness, which a face-on galaxy hides, and it needs the dispersion of the stars that hold the disc up, which the light measured may not belong to.
A spiral drawn by velocities alone
A map of the Milky Way's gas is built by turning each cloud's velocity into a distance with a circular rotation curve. Gas in a spiral arm does not move on circles: it streams by ten or fifteen kilometres a second in a pattern locked to the arms, so the distance errors are locked to the arms too. Read that way, a disc with no arms in it at all comes out of the calculation with arms.
A galaxy born without a halo
When two galaxies collide, some of the gas flung out along their tidal tails condenses into new dwarf galaxies. Debris launched from a disc cannot take the dark halo with it, so these dwarfs should rotate at the speed their own gas and stars allow and no faster. The relation that predicts every ordinary galaxy's rotation from its baryons says they should rotate twice as fast. One rotation curve decides between a halo and a law — except that the inclination of a lumpy young disc can move the answer by more than the difference.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Dark matter haloThe baryonic Tully–Fisher relationMass-to-light ratioVelocity dispersionDark matterAdiabatic contractionDegeneracyThe disc–halo degeneracyEnclosed massEscape velocityExponential discGalactic plane