Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Series

Polarimetry — the series

6 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. A peak at 0.55 µm, and therefore a grain size. Interstellar polarisation against wavelength — the Serkowski law, p(λ) = p_max exp[−K ln²(λ_max/λ)] with K = 1.66 λ_max. The heavy curve peaks at 0.550 µm, measured off the drawing rather than read back from the parameter, and falls to half its peak at 1.314 µm on the red side, against the closed form λ_max exp√(ln2/K) = 1.315. That peak wavelength is the measurement. It is set by the size of the grains doing the aligning — bigger grains, longer λ_max — and it is tied to the shape of the extinction curve along the same sight line by R_V ≈ 5.5 λ_max, which gives 3.03 here against the diffuse-medium value of 3.1. The two faint curves are populations peaking at 0.35 µm and 0.75 µm: the same amount of polarisation, distributed differently, and a different dust. Nothing in a photometric measurement of the same star distinguishes them.

    The direction a photon count throws away

    A photometer records how many photons arrived. It discards a two-component quantity that survives every attenuation on the way, and that quantity carries a magnetic field direction, a grain size, and the shape of an exploding star nobody can resolve.

    part 1 · starlight
  2. A 3-gauss field moves the line by 0.33% of its width and is measured anyway. Above: the Fe I 6173 Å line, Landé factor 2.5, at a Doppler width of 0.041 Å. The solid curve is the unmagnetised profile; the dashed curve is the same line in a longitudinal field of 3 gauss, which splits it by 1.3·10⁻⁴ Å — 0.33 per cent of its own width — and is drawn on top of it because the two are not distinguishable. The double-lobed curve underneath them is the Stokes V profile of that same field, magnified 100 times: the two σ components are circularly polarised with opposite handedness, so what is lost in the sum survives in the difference, and the difference of two profiles a hair apart is the derivative of one of them. Below: what that buys. The V amplitude is linear in the field, because it is a first derivative; every signature of the same field in the intensity is quadratic, because a symmetric splitting can only broaden. At a polarimetric precision of 10⁻⁴ the first reaches 0.1 gauss; at a line-width accuracy of 0.001 the second reaches 38, a factor of 420 worse. A quantity far too small to resolve is measured because it is the only thing in the signal that carries a sign — and the same argument run the other way says what polarimetry cannot do: a field of mixed polarity inside the resolution element cancels in V and does not cancel in I, so the 3000-gauss field of a sunspot, which does resolve, is measured the other way round.

    A field strength read off a line that will not split

    A few hundred gauss splits a spectral line by a ten-thousandth of its own Doppler width, which no spectrograph will ever resolve. The two components are circularly polarised with opposite handedness, so the split survives in the difference of two polarisations — where it is linear in the field rather than quadratic.

    part 2 · starlight
  3. Two effects that are blind in opposite directions. The sensitivity of two magnetic diagnostics against field strength, on a logarithmic axis spanning five decades. The Zeeman effect measures the line-of-sight component and adds it up along the path, so a field tangled into 100 independent cells inside one resolution element averages down by a factor of 10 and reports almost nothing — which is exactly the situation in a chromosphere or a turbulent cloud. The Hanle effect is a different device altogether: a field precesses the atom between absorption and re-emission, so a scattering line's polarisation is rotated and reduced, and the amount depends on how far the precession gets in one radiative lifetime. That makes it sensitive around 1 gauss for a 100-nanosecond level, and — the useful part — it does not care about sign, so a tangled field does not cancel. Above the crossing at 27.7 gauss the Hanle signal has saturated and carries no strength information, and the Zeeman effect is the instrument. Neither is a measurement of the field; each is a measurement of what the field did to something else.

    Two instruments blind in opposite directions

    The Zeeman effect measures the component of a field along the line of sight and adds it up, so a field tangled into a hundred cells reports a tenth of one cell's strength. The Hanle effect measures how far an atom precesses between absorbing and re-emitting, does not care about sign, and saturates just where the Zeeman effect becomes useful.

    part 3 · starlight
  4. An instrument 1.4 times as polarised as the sky it is measuring. The Stokes plane, with the two linear polarisation parameters as axes. The tight cluster near the centre is a set of stars known to be unpolarised, observed through the same instrument: they should sit at the origin and do not, and their mean is the instrumental polarisation — 0.77 per cent here, which is 1.4 times the real polarisation of the field. The other cluster is the field stars, whose measured values are the sum of their own polarisation and the same instrumental offset. Subtracting one mean from the other recovers 0.59 per cent at the right angle. Two things make this worth doing carefully. The offset is a vector, so leaving it in rotates the measured position angle as well as changing its magnitude — by 31 degrees here — and a calibration that only fixes the scale does not touch that. And the offset depends on where the telescope was pointing, because the reflection angles do, so the standards have to be observed at the same place in the sky and at the same instrument rotation.

    An instrument more polarised than the sky

    Every oblique reflection polarises. A telescope is a stack of oblique reflections, so it adds a fraction of a per cent of polarisation to everything it looks at — which for most astronomical sources is more than they have themselves, and which is a vector rather than a scale error, so it rotates the answer as well as changing its size.

    part 4 · starlight
  5. How fast to switch. The rms false polarisation left by a 1 per cent rms brightness fluctuation, against the modulation frequency, both on logarithmic scales, for fluctuations whose spectrum turns down at 5, 20, 100 Hz. Below the turnover the false signal is the whole fluctuation, about 0.7 per cent; above it, it falls steeply as the pairs are taken faster than the air changes. To reach a part in ten thousand (dashed) — the precision at which stellar and planetary polarisation becomes interesting — the switching must run at 3,311 Hz, 13,183 Hz, 66,069 Hz respectively: switching at hertz is useless, and a single beam needs kilohertz or more.

    A polarisation measured faster than the air changes

    Polarisation is a difference between two brightnesses, and the brightness of a star seen through the air changes by a per cent from one millisecond to the next. Measure the two one after the other and the air's flicker becomes a false polarisation a hundred times larger than the signals worth having. The cure is to switch between them faster than the air can change, or to measure both at once and then swap them — turning a calibration problem into a differential one.

    part 5 · starlight
  6. A star polarised only at its edge. The degree of linear polarisation of light from an atmosphere where electron scattering is the only opacity, against projected distance from the disc's centre in stellar radii (solid), and the relative brightness of the disc (dashed, scaled so the centre is 12). The polarisation is zero at the centre, 0.2 per cent halfway out, 1.9 per cent at nine-tenths of the radius and 11.7 per cent at the limb, always parallel to the limb. The brightness falls to a third towards the edge, so the most polarised light is also the faintest.

    A polarisation that a round star cancels

    In 1946 Chandrasekhar worked out that light leaving a hot star's atmosphere, where scattering by free electrons dominates, is polarised parallel to the star's edge — not at all at the centre of the disc, 11.7 per cent at the very limb. Over a round, unresolved star the pattern adds up to exactly nothing. It took seventy years to see it in the light of a whole star, because something has to break the circle first: a companion crossing the disc, a planet, or a star spun so fast that its outline is no longer round.

    part 6 · starlight

All series