Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Atmospheric escape — where it appears

The loss of a planet's atmosphere to space, by evaporation, by hydrodynamic outflow, or by ions being picked up by the stellar wind. Each channel is driven by the star's high-energy output rather than by anything the planet does. Which channel dominates depends on the planet's gravity and on the star's high-energy output rather than on its magnetic field.

Named by 10 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A gap where planets should be. The number of planets per star per interval of log radius, for orbital periods under a hundred days, corrected for detection efficiency. There are two peaks — super-Earths near 1.3 R⊕ and sub-Neptunes near 2.4 R⊕ — and a deficit between them at 1.89 R⊕, where the occurrence falls to 33% of the peak. The gap is not a gap in what can be detected: detection efficiency rises smoothly through it, so a smooth underlying distribution could not produce a dip there.

A gap in a histogram that says how planets are built

Between the super-Earths and the sub-Neptunes there is a radius at which planets are markedly rarer. The gap is not a gap in what can be detected, and its slope with orbital period names the process that made it.

exoplanets · Radius valley The shield that does not shield. Above: measured ion escape rates for three planets against their surface magnetic field. Venus and Mars have no dynamo at all and Earth has one, and the three rates lie within a factor of 9 — with the magnetised planet losing the most. The intuition that a magnetosphere protects an atmosphere is not a small correction away from being right; the measurement does not support it. Below: why. A dipole's field lines are not all closed. Those emerging within a polar cap reconnect with the wind's own field and lead straight to space, and the cap's area is set by how far the magnetosphere reaches — a boundary at ten planetary radii still leaves 5.1 per cent of the surface open. So a magnetosphere is both a shield and a funnel: it deflects the wind from most of the planet and collects ions from the whole ionosphere into the polar wind, which is exactly what an instrument above the poles measures leaving. Whether the net is protection depends on quantities nobody can compute from the field strength alone, and the three points above are the state of the evidence.

The shield that is also a funnel

A magnetic field is supposed to protect an atmosphere from the stellar wind. Venus and Mars have no dynamo and Earth has one, and their measured ion escape rates lie within a factor of a few — with the magnetised planet losing the most, because a dipole's polar field lines are open and lead straight to space.

exoplanets · Atmospheric escape A loss rate that stops following the starlight. The rate at which a hot Jupiter of 1.38 Jupiter radii and 0.69 Jupiter masses loses its atmosphere, in grams per second, against the ionising flux it receives, in erg per square centimetre per second, both on logarithmic axes. The dashed line is the energy-limited rate with a heating efficiency of 0.3: linear in the flux, 1.04·10¹⁰ g s⁻¹ at 10³. The solid curve follows it at low flux and turns over near 10⁴, where the base of the wind becomes nearly fully ionised and each recombination radiates its energy as Lyman-α instead of heating the flow; above that the rate grows only as the square root of the flux. At 10⁶ erg cm⁻² s⁻¹, the flux such a planet receives from a young, active star, the energy-limited formula overestimates the loss by a factor of 11. A single efficiency cannot describe both ends of the curve: fitted at one flux, it is wrong at the other.

An escape that stops following the starlight

The standard estimate of how fast a planet loses its atmosphere assumes the loss grows in proportion to the ultraviolet light it absorbs. It does, up to a point. Beyond about ten thousand erg per square centimetre per second the escaping gas is fully ionised, its heat leaves as Lyman-α light instead of lifting anything, and the loss grows only as the square root of the flux — so the one efficiency every calculation needs is really a function of where the planet sits.

exoplanets · Atmospheric escape Ions picked up from Mars and swept off on loops. The paths of a hydrogen and an oxygen ion created at rest just above the dayside of Mars and picked up by the solar wind, flowing left to right at 420 km/s through an interplanetary field of 3 nT perpendicular to the page. In the planet's frame each moves on a cycloid: it is accelerated by the wind's electric field, turns in the magnetic field, comes momentarily to rest and repeats, drifting downstream at the wind's speed and reaching twice it at the top of each loop — four times the wind's energy per unit mass. The loop height is twice the gyroradius: 2923 km for hydrogen, 46774 km for oxygen, against a planetary radius of 3390 km. The oxygen is thrown clear of the planet in a single plume to one side, which is how a planet without a magnetic field loses its heavy atmosphere to the wind.

A planet that borrows the wind's field

Venus and Mars have no magnetic field of their own, yet the solar wind does not reach their atmospheres. It is stopped by their ionospheres, whose thermal pressure balances the wind's at an altitude that moves logarithmically with every gust, and the interplanetary field piles up and drapes around the obstacle to make a magnetosphere on loan. The arrangement holds only while the ionosphere out-pushes the wind, and it leaks heavy ions on loops wider than the planet.

sky · Magnetosphere Four rocky planets against the bare-rock limit: TRAPPIST-1b at 0.99, TRAPPIST-1c at 0.87, LHS 3844b at 1.01, GJ 367b at 0.99. Published day-side brightness temperatures of four small planets orbiting M dwarfs, each divided by the temperature its day side would have as dark bare rock re-radiating where it absorbs (dot, with its uncertainty), with the value for heat spread evenly over the whole planet marked for comparison (grey tick, at 0.71). TRAPPIST-1b: 503 ± 26 K against a bare-rock 508 K; TRAPPIST-1c: 380 ± 31 K against a bare-rock 434 K; LHS 3844b: 1040 ± 40 K against a bare-rock 1031 K; GJ 367b: 1728 ± 90 K against a bare-rock 1741 K. Three sit at the bare-rock limit within their errors, which leaves room for no thick atmosphere on dark rock. TRAPPIST-1c sits about one in eight below it, which a thin atmosphere could explain, and so could a moderately reflective surface. None comes near the even-redistribution value that a thick atmosphere would give.

A day side as hot as bare rock

A planet with no air can be no hotter on its day side than bare rock that re-radiates every photon where it lands. An atmosphere carries some of that heat to the night side, so the day side comes out cooler. For a rocky planet too small for its spectrum to be read, that difference is the test: three of the first four small planets around red dwarfs measured this way sit at the bare-rock limit, and the fourth sits below it by an amount that a thin atmosphere, or a brighter surface, could explain equally well.

exoplanets · Exoplanet atmospheres One planet's helium line, around four kinds of star. The excess absorption at the centre of the 1083 nm helium line during transit, against the mass-loss rate, for one sub-Neptune — 26 Earth masses, 4.4 Earth radii, 0.0525 AU — losing an isothermal wind at 8,000 K, around four representative stellar spectra. Both scales logarithmic. The same outflow absorbs very differently: at 1 × 10¹⁰ g s⁻¹ the depth is 0.06%, 0.14%, 0.35%, 0.40% around an F star, a Sun-like star, an active K dwarf, an active M dwarf. Read the other way, a measured depth of 1% means 1.1 × 10¹¹ g s⁻¹ around an F star, 6.3 × 10¹⁰ g s⁻¹ around a Sun-like star, 3.0 × 10¹⁰ g s⁻¹ around an active K dwarf, 2.9 × 10¹⁰ g s⁻¹ around an active M dwarf — a factor of 4 between the extremes, from the star alone.

A helium line that weighs the star first

The metastable helium line at 1083 nanometres made the escape of a planet's atmosphere measurable from the ground. But the atoms it sees exist only in a balance between the star's extreme-ultraviolet light, which fills the level, and its mid-ultraviolet, which empties it — so the same outflow is six times deeper around an active K dwarf than around an F star, one depth allows a fifty-fold range of mass-loss rates across the wind's possible temperatures, and a rate inferred from it inherits a share of every error in a spectrum that cannot be observed.

exoplanets · Atmospheric escape Whether a field helped, depending on what limits the escape. The ratio of the atmospheric loss of a magnetised Earth to that of the same Earth without a field, against the Sun's age, both on logarithmic scales, set at 2 today — the magnetised planet losing more — for two ways an unmagnetised planet's loss can scale. If both planets lose atmosphere in proportion to the solar-wind power they intercept (blue), the magnetosphere's cross-section shrinks as the young Sun's denser wind compresses it while the bare planet's does not, and the ratio falls to 0.46 at 0.7 billion years: the field protected the young Earth, on balance from before 1.9 billion years. If instead the bare planet's loss is set by the ions the Sun's ultraviolet makes above it (orange), the ultraviolet rises more slowly into the past than the wind's pressure does, and the ratio grows to 3.7: the field cost the young Earth more than it saves today. The answer to whether a magnetic field protects an atmosphere is not a property of fields; it is a statement about which process limits the escape, and the young Sun amplifies the difference.

A shield that depends on what limits the leak

Today the Earth, with its magnetic field, loses ions to space about as fast as Venus and Mars without one — a little faster, by most measures. Whether that was also true under the young Sun, whose wind pressed eighty times harder, depends on something no measurement of the present can settle. If escape is limited by the wind's power, the field protected the young Earth; if it is limited by the ions the Sun's ultraviolet makes, the field cost it more than it does now. The young Sun does not decide the question. It amplifies whichever answer is right.

sky · Magnetosphere An envelope worn down by a young star's ultraviolet. The mass of a primordial hydrogen envelope, as a fraction of the planet's mass, against age, for an Earth-mass planet in the middle of the eventual habitable zone of a 0.1 M☉ star, starting with 0.1%, 0.3%, 1%, 3% of its mass in hydrogen. The star contracts toward the main sequence and stays saturated in X-rays for 1.5 Gyr; the envelope inflates the planet, so it intercepts more of that light and loses mass faster than a bare rock would. The shaded span is the 75 Myr during which the planet receives more light than the runaway-greenhouse limit, when any exposed ocean would be steam. 0.1% is gone at 463 Myr; 0.3% is gone at 1.5 Gyr; 1% outlasts 5 Gyr; 3% outlasts 5 Gyr. An envelope that outlasts the shaded span has shielded the ocean through the whole of the runaway; one that also outlasts the planet's present age has left it a small gas-rich planet rather than a rocky one.

An envelope spent so an ocean could stay

A planet in the eventual habitable zone of a small red dwarf spends its first tens of millions of years too close to a star that is still contracting and still bright, with its ocean boiled into steam and the steam being split and lost. A wisp of hydrogen left over from the nebula — a few hundredths of a per cent of the planet's mass — would change that, because the star's ultraviolet would spend itself removing the hydrogen first. The envelope that shields the ocean and the envelope that never leaves bracket a range a factor of twenty wide, and the amounts a rocky planet is expected to capture fall inside it.

exoplanets · Habitable zone An envelope that boils away in a million years, or keeps for longer than the universe. The time a 5-Earth-mass planet takes to lose an envelope of 5.0% of its mass through an isothermal wind driven by its own heat and the star's light, against the escape parameter Λ at the envelope's outer edge — the ratio of the gravitational binding of a molecule there to its thermal energy — for equilibrium temperatures of 500, 800, 1200 K, on a logarithmic time axis. The rate is exponential in Λ, so the time grows by a factor of e for every unit: each step of ten in Λ is more than four decades of time. The envelope goes in under a million years below Λ ≈ 19, 18, 18 and lasts longer than a billion years above Λ ≈ 26, 26, 26. The window between a million and a billion years is a band only about seven units of Λ wide, so a planet is either boiling or effectively sealed.

An envelope that boils down before the starlight strips it

The usual story of how small planets lose their hydrogen starts with the star's ultraviolet light and runs for a hundred million years. It skips the first million. When the gas disc that fed a young planet disappears, an envelope that was swollen and held in by the disc's pressure is suddenly exposed, and it pours off as a wind powered by ordinary heat — until it has shrunk to the size at which the same number near thirty that governs every escaping atmosphere shuts the flow off.

exoplanets · Atmospheric escape Two exponents a solar cycle cannot pull apart. The exponents of a fit of an unmagnetised planet's ion loss to the ultraviolet (horizontal) and to the solar wind's pressure (vertical), shown as the region each fit allows at two standard deviations around a true pair of (0.5, 0.5), from 200 independent samples with a scatter of 0.2 decades, over a cycle in which the ultraviolet varies by 0.12 decades and the pressure by 0.25, for correlations of 0.3, 0.7, 0.9 between the two. The marked corners are the two pure limits: a loss set by the ions the ultraviolet makes, (1, 0), and one set by the wind's power, (0, 1). With weak correlation the two exponents are each known to ±0.25 and ±0.12; at a correlation of 0.9 the ultraviolet's is uncertain by ±0.54, and the ellipse stretches along the line on which raising one exponent and lowering the other leaves the fit unchanged.

Two exponents a solar cycle cannot pull apart

Whether a magnetic field protected the early Earth's air depends on what limits the escape of ions from a planet without one — the ultraviolet that makes them or the solar wind that carries them off. Measured at Mars through a solar cycle, the two causes rise and fall together, and the fit that tries to separate them leaves each exponent uncertain by half its value. Remarkably, the young Sun's loss is predicted well anyway. What spoils the prediction is not the confusion but a switch between the two limits that the present-day data cannot see coming.

sky · Magnetosphere

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

MagnetosphereSub-neptuneEnergy-limited escapeExtreme-ultravioletParker windSolar windXUV fluxHabitable zoneHydrodynamic escapeInduced magnetospherePhotoevaporationRadius valley

All concepts