Beaming — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Also named here as super eddington accretion — the same set of essays touches all of them, so they are one junction rather than several.
A ceiling on the light and not on the mass
Pour gas onto a black hole a thousand times faster than the Eddington rate and it shines at only about eight times its limit. The rest of the energy is either blown away or swallowed, and those two fates give the same luminosity while differing by a factor of the supply in how fast the object grows — so the light a super-Eddington source emits cannot say which one it is.
A nebula that cannot be beamed at
An X-ray source a hundred times brighter than a neutron star should be allowed to shine may be lying about its luminosity: if its light leaves through a narrow funnel pointed at the Earth, it looks as bright as a source a hundred times more powerful. A single observer cannot tell. The gas around it can. A nebula surrounding the source is lit from every direction at once and records what the source emits in all of them, and a bubble blown by its wind records the power it has put out over a million years. Each is a calorimeter no beam can fool.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Eddington limitSuper eddington accretionAccretionNeutron starsPhotoionisationPhoton trappingRadiative efficiencyRecombination linesSalpeter timeSpherisation radiusSpin-upStellar winds