Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Neutron stars — where it appears

The collapsed cores of massive stars, about one and a half solar masses in a sphere some twelve kilometres across. They are held up by the degeneracy and interactions of neutrons, and appear as pulsars, magnetars and the accretors of X-ray binaries.

Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

What a deformability is made of. The two factors of the tidal deformability Λ = ⅔ k₂ C⁻⁵ for a 1.4 solar-mass neutron star, each relative to its value at 12 km, on a logarithmic scale, against the star's radius. The Love number k₂ — the same number that measures a moon's response to a planet's tide — rises by a factor of 1.6 between 10 and 14 km; the inverse fifth power of the compactness rises by 5.4. Of the change in Λ across that range, 78 per cent, on a logarithmic scale, comes from the compactness: most of what a deformability measures is how large the star is for its mass. The Love number carries the rest: how centrally concentrated the matter is, which is where the equation of state enters beyond the radius.

A Love number measured at nuclear density

The number that told Cassini there was water under Titan's ice is defined the same way for a neutron star, and in the last tenth of a second before two of them merge it changes the shape of the gravitational wave they emit. What the wave measures is mostly not the Love number itself but the star's size, raised to the sixth power — which makes a faint tidal signal into one of the few direct measurements of how large matter at nuclear density lets a star be.

gravitation · Love numbers A field that makes electrons transparent. The electron-scattering cross-section for photons polarised across a strong magnetic field, as a share of the free-electron value, against photon energy, for fields of 10¹², 10¹³, 10¹⁴ gauss, on logarithmic axes. Below the electron cyclotron energy — 12, 116, 1160 keV for these fields — an electron bound to the field can barely respond to a wave whose electric field is perpendicular to it, and the cross-section falls as the square of the ratio of energies. At the 10 keV of these sources' X-rays, a 10¹⁴ gauss field reduces it 13,456-fold. The Eddington limit is written with the free-electron cross-section; in such a field it is the wrong number.

A limit written for free electrons

The Eddington limit says a star cannot shine brighter than the point where its light pushes its own gas away, and the push is calculated for free electrons scattering light. In a magnetic field of a hundred trillion gauss an electron is not free. It is bound to the field, it can barely respond to light polarised across it, and the limit calculated for it is the wrong number by a factor of hundreds — which is one of two ways a neutron star can shine five hundred times brighter than it is supposed to.

stars · Eddington limit

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Accretion columnChirp massCompactnessCorotation radiusCyclotron resonanceEddington limitElectron scatteringEquation of stateGravitational wavesLove numbersMagnetarsMagnetospheric radius

All concepts