Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Contrast — where it appears

The brightness of a faint companion, such as a planet, divided by the brightness of the star beside it. Direct imaging is limited less by the planet's faintness than by the starlight that leaks into its position, so the achievable contrast at each angular separation decides what can be seen.

Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Contrast against separation, which is where direct imaging lives. Planet-to-star brightness ratio against apparent separation, both logarithmic, for a system 10 parsecs away. The reflected-light curves are A_g(R_p/a)² and fall as the inverse square of the orbit; the thermal curve is the ratio of two Planck functions at 10 µm and does not, which is why every imaged planet so far is young and hot rather than merely large. The vertical lines are diffraction limits λ/D — nothing inside a telescope's own line is reachable by it at any contrast at all. An Earth at ten parsecs sits at 6.3e-10, which is 4 orders of magnitude below the faintest planet yet imaged. The four imaged planets are plotted at their measured near-infrared contrasts rather than at 10 µm, because the near infrared is the band they were found in — which is itself part of the argument, since a young planet is hot enough to be bright where its star is not.

Nine orders of magnitude, half an arcsecond apart

Photographing a planet is not a resolution problem. It is a contrast problem, and the contrast is set by an inverse square that punishes exactly the planets a telescope can most easily separate.

exoplanets · Direct imaging A fringe that is dark on the star and bright on the planet. The fraction of a point source's light an interferometric nuller transmits, against its angle from the star along the baseline, in milliarcseconds, for two telescopes 10.3 m apart observing at 10 μm — the baseline that puts the first bright fringe exactly on a planet 1 AU from a star 10 pc away, 100 milliarcseconds out. The solid curve is the two-telescope null, sin²: it is zero on the star and rises as the square of the angle. The dashed curve is a quartic null, sin⁴, made by combining four apertures: it is darker near the star and narrower at the planet. The shaded strip is the star itself, 0.93 milliarcseconds across. It looks negligible at this scale, but the null is not perfect across it, and what leaks from that strip is the quantity the whole technique has to beat.

A null filled in by the star itself

Two telescopes combined out of phase cancel a star on the axis and pass a planet beside it, and the cancellation rises only as the square of the angle away from the axis. A star is not a point, so its own edges sit off the axis — and for the Sun seen with the baseline that finds the Earth, they leak through at a hundred and fifty times the Earth's brightness, at every distance, because the leak depends only on the size of the star compared with the planet's orbit.

exoplanets · Direct imaging

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Inner working angleAdaptive opticsAlbedoAngular diameterAngular separationBaselineCoronagraphDiffraction limitDirect imagingHabitable zoneMid-infraredNulling interferometry

All concepts