Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Grain alignment — where it appears

The tendency of elongated interstellar dust grains to orient themselves with respect to the magnetic field. It polarises transmitted starlight, which is one of the few ways the field's direction can be mapped, and it requires the grains to be non-spherical.

Named by 6 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A peak at 0.55 µm, and therefore a grain size. Interstellar polarisation against wavelength — the Serkowski law, p(λ) = p_max exp[−K ln²(λ_max/λ)] with K = 1.66 λ_max. The heavy curve peaks at 0.550 µm, measured off the drawing rather than read back from the parameter, and falls to half its peak at 1.314 µm on the red side, against the closed form λ_max exp√(ln2/K) = 1.315. That peak wavelength is the measurement. It is set by the size of the grains doing the aligning — bigger grains, longer λ_max — and it is tied to the shape of the extinction curve along the same sight line by R_V ≈ 5.5 λ_max, which gives 3.03 here against the diffuse-medium value of 3.1. The two faint curves are populations peaking at 0.35 µm and 0.75 µm: the same amount of polarisation, distributed differently, and a different dust. Nothing in a photometric measurement of the same star distinguishes them.

The direction a photon count throws away

A photometer records how many photons arrived. It discards a two-component quantity that survives every attenuation on the way, and that quantity carries a magnetic field direction, a grain size, and the shape of an exploding star nobody can resolve.

starlight · Polarimetry The light dust removes at 0.56 µm comes back at 124 µm. One energy budget drawn twice, on a wavelength axis spanning four and a half decades. The upper curve is starlight from a 6500 K photosphere; the shaded region under it is the part removed by a magnitude of visual extinction, computed from the same CCM law the other modes here draw, and weighted towards the ultraviolet exactly as that law says. The curve on the right is what the grains do with it: a modified blackbody at 20 K with an emissivity index of 1.8, normalised so that the energy under it equals the energy under the shaded region. Integrating the two curves actually drawn returns a ratio of 1.000. The starlight peaks at 0.56 microns and the re-emission at 124, a factor of 220, so nothing about the two is recognisable as the same photons and everything about them is the same joules. The practical consequence is a rule about arithmetic: a galaxy's ultraviolet luminosity and its far-infrared luminosity are not two independent measurements of how many young stars it has. One is the light that escaped and the other is the light that did not, and adding them without noticing counts part of the population twice.

The dust is not lost light, it is moved light

An extinction curve says how much starlight dust removes. It does not say the light is gone. Every photon a grain absorbs heats the grain, which radiates it back out at twenty kelvin — so an extinction measurement and a far-infrared spectrum are two halves of one energy budget, and the area under them is the same area.

starlight · Extinction A field strength read off the scatter of directions. The Davis–Chandrasekhar–Fermi estimate: field strength against the dispersion of polarisation angles across a cloud, at a density of 10⁴ molecules per cubic centimetre and a turbulent velocity of 0.9 kilometres a second. The polarisation directions themselves contain no field strength — an aligned grain reports which way the field points and nothing about how hard it is pulling. The strength is in the disorder. Turbulence of a given energy bends a stiff field less than a weak one, so the angular scatter is the ratio of the turbulent velocity to the Alfvén speed, and inverting it gives the field: 220 µG at a 9-degree dispersion. The relation is exactly inverse, so the estimate is most trustworthy where the field is most ordered and worst where it matters most. The factor of 0.5 in front is not theory — it is what simulations of a known field, analysed this way, turn out to need, and the honest statement is that this method is calibrated rather than derived.

A direction measured by something with no strength in it

An interstellar grain spins with its long axis across the magnetic field, so starlight through a cloud is polarised along the field and the cloud's own emission across it. The observable contains no field strength whatever — and the strength is recovered anyway, from how much the directions disagree.

galaxies · Dust polarisation Polarised dust, synchrotron and the signal between them. The amplitude of B-mode polarisation at angular multipole 80, in microkelvin of CMB temperature on a logarithmic scale, against frequency from 20 to 450 GHz, for a patch of sky as clean as the cleanest large field observed. Dust is a modified blackbody with emissivity index 1.53 at 19.6 K, normalised to 4.6 µK² at 353 GHz; synchrotron falls as frequency to the power −3.1 in antenna temperature, normalised to an illustrative 1 µK² at 23 GHz. The horizontal lines are a primordial signal with tensor-to-scalar ratio 0.01, about 0.048 µK, and the lensing B-modes, about 0.071 µK. The foregrounds together are faintest at 81 GHz, at 0.038 µK, 0.8 times the signal. At 150 GHz the dust alone is 0.105 µK, the amplitude a tensor ratio of 0.046 would produce; at 353 GHz it is 2.23 µK, 47 times the signal. No frequency has the signal above the foreground.

A foreground drawn by the field it traces

The grains that polarise starlight along the Galaxy's magnetic field glow, at millimetre wavelengths, with light polarised across it — and that glow is brighter than the primordial signal cosmologists are looking for at every frequency above eighty gigahertz and in every patch of sky. Its pattern on the sky is set by how loosely the interstellar filaments follow the field, and removing it rests on a bet that the clouds along each line of sight share one temperature.

galaxies · Dust polarisation A polarisation fraction that should change with frequency. The polarisation fraction of dust emission relative to its value at 353 GHz, against frequency on a logarithmic axis. A single population at a single temperature gives a fraction that does not change at all. If the carbon grains are unaligned and warmer than the silicates, they take a growing share of the emission toward high frequency and dilute the polarisation: at 1200 GHz the fraction falls to 0.90 of its 353 GHz value for a 3 K difference and 0.85 for 5 K. Half-aligned carbon halves the effect. The shaded band is flat to within ten per cent between 100 and 1200 GHz, the precision with which the satellite and balloon measurements across this range agree with no change.

The grains that glow and the grains that align

Interstellar dust polarises starlight and polarises its own glow, and for decades the standard account gave the two jobs to different grains — aligned silicates, unaligned carbon. Two populations at two temperatures predict a polarisation fraction that falls toward high frequency; what satellites and balloons measured was a fraction that does not change. That flatness, which no grain shape can fake, says the grains that glow are the grains that align.

galaxies · Dust polarisation How a cloud's glow loses its polarisation as it thickens. The polarisation fraction of dust emission against the column density through a cloud, both on logarithmic scales, for four clouds built from cells of 10²¹ hydrogen atoms per square centimetre, each polarising its glow by 20%. A single uniform field with every grain aligned keeps 20% at every column. A field tangled from cell to cell by 40 degrees about a mean direction loses polarisation at first and then levels off at 7.5%, the share its mean direction carries: between 10²² and 10²³ its slope is −0.05. A field with no mean direction at all adds its cells as a pure random walk and falls with a slope of −0.55. Grains that align only in the outer 3 × 10²¹ cm⁻² on each side, where starlight still reaches, contribute nothing from the interior, and the fraction falls with a slope of −1.00.

A falling polarisation and the angle that says why

The glow of dust in a molecular cloud is less polarised the thicker the cloud, almost everywhere it has been measured. Two explanations fit that fall equally well — a magnetic field tangled along the line of sight, or grains in the dark interior that have stopped lining up with it — and between them they can produce any slope a cloud has shown. What separates them is not how much polarisation is lost but whether the direction of what remains wanders.

galaxies · Dust polarisation

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Interstellar dustDust polarisationMagnetic fieldModified blackbodyRadiative torqueDavis chandrasekhar fermiExtinctionMolecular cloudsPolarisation fractionSerkowski lawStokes parametersTurbulence

All concepts