Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Molecular clouds — where it appears

Cold, dense regions of the interstellar medium in which hydrogen is molecular and stars form. Their temperatures are near ten kelvin and their densities above a hundred particles per cubic centimetre. They are supersonically turbulent and magnetised, and both properties compete with gravity in deciding whether they collapse.

Named by 6 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The field a collapse would arrive with, and the one it has. Field strength against hydrogen density, both logarithmic, over the eight decades between diffuse gas and a protostellar core. The steeper line is what perfect flux freezing demands: a sphere collapsing conserves both mass and flux, so B goes as R⁻² while ρ goes as R⁻³, and therefore B goes as the two-thirds power of the density exactly — an exponent with no free parameter in it. The shallower locus is what Zeeman measurements find: a flat branch at about 10 µG up to 300 per cubic centimetre, where the density is rising and the field is not, and a rise as the 0.65 power of the density above it. By the density of a core the two differ by a factor of 1, and a star built at the frozen-flux value would carry a field four orders of magnitude beyond anything measured on one. The flat branch is the important half: it says the gas is moving along field lines without dragging them, which is what gravity does to a cloud that is still magnetically supported, and it locates where the freezing has to break.

A field that would have arrived ten thousand times too strong

A collapsing cloud carries its magnetic field with it, and the arithmetic of that is not negotiable — the field grows as the two-thirds power of the density. Run it from a diffuse cloud to a protostellar core and the answer is four orders of magnitude above anything measured on a young star.

stars · Flux freezing A field strength read off the scatter of directions. The Davis–Chandrasekhar–Fermi estimate: field strength against the dispersion of polarisation angles across a cloud, at a density of 10⁴ molecules per cubic centimetre and a turbulent velocity of 0.9 kilometres a second. The polarisation directions themselves contain no field strength — an aligned grain reports which way the field points and nothing about how hard it is pulling. The strength is in the disorder. Turbulence of a given energy bends a stiff field less than a weak one, so the angular scatter is the ratio of the turbulent velocity to the Alfvén speed, and inverting it gives the field: 220 µG at a 9-degree dispersion. The relation is exactly inverse, so the estimate is most trustworthy where the field is most ordered and worst where it matters most. The factor of 0.5 in front is not theory — it is what simulations of a known field, analysed this way, turn out to need, and the honest statement is that this method is calibrated rather than derived.

A direction measured by something with no strength in it

An interstellar grain spins with its long axis across the magnetic field, so starlight through a cloud is polarised along the field and the cloud's own emission across it. The observable contains no field strength whatever — and the strength is recovered anyway, from how much the directions disagree.

galaxies · Dust polarisation One dimensionless number decides whether a cloud may collapse. Field strength against hydrogen column density, with three loci of constant mass-to-flux ratio. The ratio of mass to magnetic flux is conserved under flux freezing, so it cannot be changed by anything that happens during a collapse — which is what makes it a criterion rather than a description. Its critical value is the pure constant 1/(2π√G), and dividing by that gives the dimensionless λ drawn here: below λ = 1 the field can hold the cloud up for ever, however cold it gets, because gravity and the magnetic force scale the same way with radius; above it no field strength suffices. Each locus is a straight line of slope exactly one, because at fixed λ the required field is exactly proportional to the column. Zeeman measurements of dense cores put them a little above the line and their envelopes a little below it, which is the arrangement a slow leak of flux out of the centre would produce and is the observational case for ambipolar diffusion.

A threshold with no free parameter in it

Divide a cloud's mass by the magnetic flux threading it. Gravity and the magnetic force both fall as the inverse square of the radius, so the ratio cannot change during a collapse — and the critical value that separates a cloud which must collapse from one that never can is one over two pi root G, a pure constant.

stars · Star formation How a cloud's glow loses its polarisation as it thickens. The polarisation fraction of dust emission against the column density through a cloud, both on logarithmic scales, for four clouds built from cells of 10²¹ hydrogen atoms per square centimetre, each polarising its glow by 20%. A single uniform field with every grain aligned keeps 20% at every column. A field tangled from cell to cell by 40 degrees about a mean direction loses polarisation at first and then levels off at 7.5%, the share its mean direction carries: between 10²² and 10²³ its slope is −0.05. A field with no mean direction at all adds its cells as a pure random walk and falls with a slope of −0.55. Grains that align only in the outer 3 × 10²¹ cm⁻² on each side, where starlight still reaches, contribute nothing from the interior, and the fraction falls with a slope of −1.00.

A falling polarisation and the angle that says why

The glow of dust in a molecular cloud is less polarised the thicker the cloud, almost everywhere it has been measured. Two explanations fit that fall equally well — a magnetic field tangled along the line of sight, or grains in the dark interior that have stopped lining up with it — and between them they can produce any slope a cloud has shown. What separates them is not how much polarisation is lost but whether the direction of what remains wanders.

galaxies · Dust polarisation Molecules take longer to form than a cloud takes to fall. Three timescales for a shielded cloud of 100 hydrogen atoms per cubic centimetre, against its metallicity relative to the Sun's on a logarithmic scale, all in years on a logarithmic scale. Molecular hydrogen forms on dust grains, and the time to turn the cloud's atoms into molecules is inversely proportional to the dust, so to the metallicity: 5.3 million years at solar, 53 million years at a tenth, 530 million years at a hundredth. The cloud's free-fall time, 4.3 million years, does not depend on its metals. The two cross near solar metallicity: above it the molecules form as fast as the cloud can collapse, below it the cloud collapses before most of its hydrogen has become molecular. The dashed line is a galaxy's molecular depletion time, two billion years — the timescale that equilibrium arguments implicitly assume is short compared with everything else.

A molecule that forms too slowly to wait for

The atomic hydrogen in a galaxy's disc turns molecular wherever a cloud is thick enough to shield itself from starlight, and stars form where it does. That is an equilibrium statement, and equilibrium takes time. Molecular hydrogen forms on dust grains, so in gas with a tenth of the Sun's metals it forms ten times more slowly — slowly enough that a cloud can finish collapsing before most of its hydrogen has become molecular, and form its stars from atoms.

galaxies · Interstellar medium Two ways of pointing an aperture, and the fork between them. The gas-to-young-star flux ratio inside apertures of size l, relative to the whole galaxy's, for apertures centred on peaks of molecular gas (upper branch) and on peaks of Hα from young stars (lower branch), if clouds live 20 Myr, the young stars shine in Hα for 4.3 Myr, the two overlap for 2 Myr and independent regions are 150 pc apart. On large scales every aperture averages many regions at all stages and both branches return to one. On small scales an aperture holds one region at one stage, and the branches split: ×2.1 on the gas peaks and ×0.10 on the stars at 10 pc. With the young stars' phase known from stellar evolution, the upper branch gives the overlap, the lower branch the clouds' lifetime, and the scale where the fork closes the regions' separation.

A lifetime read from how gas and stars sit apart

No molecular cloud has been watched for long enough to see it age, and every cloud looks the same whether it lives for one free-fall time or for ten. But a galaxy holds thousands of clouds at every stage at once, and how often molecular gas and young stars appear in the same place — measured in apertures of shrinking size, centred first on one and then on the other — turns a single snapshot into a clock, calibrated by how long the young stars shine.

galaxies · Molecular clouds

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Star formationInterstellar dustTurbulenceAmbipolar diffusionDavis chandrasekhar fermiDust polarisationFlux freezingFree-fall timeGrain alignmentInterstellar mediumJeans massMass to flux ratio

All concepts