Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Turbulence — where it appears

Disordered fluid motion spanning a wide range of scales, in which energy injected at large scales cascades to small ones and is dissipated. In the interstellar medium it is supersonic, its pressure rivals the thermal one, and it decays in an eddy turnover time unless continuously driven.

Named by 9 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A vanishing field that changes the answer completely. The growth rate of the magnetorotational instability against wavenumber, both in units the orbital frequency sets: the vertical axis is the growth rate divided by Ω, the horizontal is the wavenumber multiplied by the Alfvén speed and divided by Ω. The maximum is exactly three quarters of the orbital frequency and it does not depend on the field strength at all — it occurs at kv_A = √15Ω/4, so a weaker field simply moves the fastest-growing wavelength to a longer one. The curve vanishes above kv_A = √3Ω, which is the only thing the field decides: modes shorter than that are stabilised by magnetic tension. An unmagnetised Keplerian disc is Rayleigh-stable and would never accrete; a disc with a field a millionth of the strength needed to matter dynamically grows a mode that doubles in about a fifth of an orbit. The limit is discontinuous, which is the reason this was found late and by algebra rather than early and by observation.

The weakest field changes the answer

A Keplerian disc is stable by every hydrodynamic test there is. Add a magnetic field of any strength whatever — a millionth of what would matter dynamically — and it becomes violently unstable, at a growth rate of three quarters of an orbit per radian that does not depend on the field at all.

gravitation · Magnetorotational instability A field strength read off the scatter of directions. The Davis–Chandrasekhar–Fermi estimate: field strength against the dispersion of polarisation angles across a cloud, at a density of 10⁴ molecules per cubic centimetre and a turbulent velocity of 0.9 kilometres a second. The polarisation directions themselves contain no field strength — an aligned grain reports which way the field points and nothing about how hard it is pulling. The strength is in the disorder. Turbulence of a given energy bends a stiff field less than a weak one, so the angular scatter is the ratio of the turbulent velocity to the Alfvén speed, and inverting it gives the field: 220 µG at a 9-degree dispersion. The relation is exactly inverse, so the estimate is most trustworthy where the field is most ordered and worst where it matters most. The factor of 0.5 in front is not theory — it is what simulations of a known field, analysed this way, turn out to need, and the honest statement is that this method is calibrated rather than derived.

A direction measured by something with no strength in it

An interstellar grain spins with its long axis across the magnetic field, so starlight through a cloud is polarised along the field and the cloud's own emission across it. The observable contains no field strength whatever — and the strength is recovered anyway, from how much the directions disagree.

galaxies · Dust polarisation A layer several times thicker than its heat can explain. The vertical density profile of the neutral gas layer, drawn twice. The narrow curve is what thermal pressure alone supports: an 8-kilometre-a-second sound speed against the vertical gravity of the stellar disc gives a scale height of 47 parsecs. The broad curve adds the three pressures that are not heat — turbulent motion, the magnetic field and the cosmic rays — which together roughly triple the total and, because the scale height goes as the square of the effective dispersion, thicken the layer by a factor of 3.1 to 145 parsecs. The observed half-thickness of the H I layer is about 150. The narrow curve is a real prediction and it is wrong, and what is missing from it is precisely the two terms that emit nothing: a field measured by Zeeman splitting and Faraday rotation, and a particle population measured by what it does to a detector on a mountain. A galaxy's gas disc is inflated by things that cannot be photographed, and the thickness is how the inflation is measured.

A disc held open by what cannot be photographed

Solve hydrostatic equilibrium for the galaxy's gas layer using its temperature and the disc's gravity, and the answer is a layer several times thinner than the one that is there. What is missing from the calculation is turbulence, a magnetic field and a population of cosmic rays — three pressures of comparable size, two of which emit nothing.

galaxies · Interstellar medium One dimensionless number decides whether a cloud may collapse. Field strength against hydrogen column density, with three loci of constant mass-to-flux ratio. The ratio of mass to magnetic flux is conserved under flux freezing, so it cannot be changed by anything that happens during a collapse — which is what makes it a criterion rather than a description. Its critical value is the pure constant 1/(2π√G), and dividing by that gives the dimensionless λ drawn here: below λ = 1 the field can hold the cloud up for ever, however cold it gets, because gravity and the magnetic force scale the same way with radius; above it no field strength suffices. Each locus is a straight line of slope exactly one, because at fixed λ the required field is exactly proportional to the column. Zeeman measurements of dense cores put them a little above the line and their envelopes a little below it, which is the arrangement a slow leak of flux out of the centre would produce and is the observational case for ambipolar diffusion.

A threshold with no free parameter in it

Divide a cloud's mass by the magnetic flux threading it. Gravity and the magnetic force both fall as the inverse square of the radius, so the ratio cannot change during a collapse — and the critical value that separates a cloud which must collapse from one that never can is one over two pi root G, a pure constant.

stars · Star formation The anisotropy each slope of escape predicts. The dipole anisotropy of cosmic rays diffusing out of a halo 4 kpc high, 3D/(cH), against energy, for diffusion slopes of ⅓, 0.5, 0.6, each normalised to the boron-to-carbon grammage at 10 GV — so all three agree at low energy and part above it. The shaded box is the range of dipole amplitudes measured between 1 and 100 TeV, a few parts in ten thousand to about a part in a thousand. At 10 TeV the three predict 0.0043, 0.014, 0.027: the slope that would let shocks inject an index of two overshoots the measurement by 27 times, and even Kolmogorov's ⅓ by 4. The normalisation of the prediction is uncertain by a factor of a few, through the arrangement of the sources and the shape of the halo; its rise with energy is not, because it is the same slope that the spectrum and the secondary ratio require.

One slope read twice, and the reading that disagrees

How fast cosmic rays leak out of the Galaxy depends on their energy through a single power, and that power is measured twice: in the falling ratio of boron to carbon, and in how unevenly the particles arrive across the sky. The first reading says one-third. The second, taken at face value, says the leak must be slower still — and neither leaves room for the spectrum shock acceleration predicts.

galaxies · Cosmic rays Spectra that age, and spectra that stop ageing. Synchrotron spectra in a 3-microgauss field, divided by the straight power law the electrons were injected with so that a spectrum with no break would be a flat line at zero, at ages of 10, 30, 100 million years. Dashed: electrons left alone, whose break falls steadily to lower frequency. Solid: the same electrons stirred throughout, gaining energy at a rate of one e-fold every 30 million years against their losses. The stirred spectra's break moves down at first and then stops, at the frequency radiated by electrons of Lorentz factor 41,763, where gain and loss balance. Read as passive spectra, the stirred ones give ages of 8.5, 18.9, 28.8 million years: the last is 3.5 times younger than the electrons are.

A lobe that reads the time since it was stirred

If a radio lobe's electrons are re-energised in place by the turbulence around them, the break in their spectrum stops falling and its spectral age stops growing, settling at the time the stirring takes to double their energy a few times over. The spectrum's shape does not betray it: a stirred lobe fits an unstirred one exactly. What betrays it is a map that stops ageing with distance, and a bill for energy that grows exponentially with the time the stirring lasts.

starlight · Synchrotron radiation Turbulence against star formation, driven two ways. Gas velocity dispersion against star-formation rate per unit area, both on logarithmic scales, for model discs of increasing gas surface density: a nearby spiral (circular speed 200 km/s at 8 kpc, gas a fifth of the disc's mass) and a disc at redshift two (the same speed at 4 kpc, gas half). Dashed: turbulence driven by supernovae alone, a tenth of their energy staying in the gas — it settles between 11 and 13 km/s however fast the disc forms stars, because more gas means both more stars and faster dissipation. Solid: the same discs when gravity can also stir them, holding the gas at marginal stability once supernovae fall short — which in the redshift-two disc happens above a gas surface density of 72 M☉ pc⁻², after which the dispersion climbs with the star-formation rate to 76 km/s. The shaded boxes are the approximate ranges in which nearby spirals and redshift-two discs are observed. Feedback alone reaches the first and not the second; with gravity the model reaches the second at its lower edge in star formation, a sign that its simple star-formation law, one per cent of the gas per free-fall time of the whole layer, is slow for the clumpy gas of those discs.

A stirring supernovae cannot pay for

The gas in a disc forming stars at redshift two moves at fifty kilometres a second in random directions, five times faster than in a spiral today, and turbulence that fast decays in a few tens of millions of years. Supernovae are the obvious source of the energy, and they run out at about thirteen kilometres a second however fast the disc forms stars. What holds the discs up is gravity — gas stirring itself by falling inward — and a disc stirred that way is also a disc pouring its gas into its own centre.

galaxies · Tully–Fisher An electroweak field decays toward one line, and helicity decides where it meets it. The comoving strength of a magnetic field against its coherence length, both on logarithmic scales. A field made at the electroweak transition, at 100 GeV, starts on a hundredth of the Hubble length then (1 AU today) with a tenth of the radiation's energy density (1 × 10⁻⁶ G), and decays as its turbulence is processed until the largest eddy is the one an Alfvén wave can cross by recombination — the straight line, 10⁻⁸ G at 1 Mpc. With no net helicity it falls as λ^−5/2 and stops at 0.038 pc and 4 × 10⁻¹⁶ G. Maximally helical, it falls only as λ^−½ and stops at 4.7 kpc and 5 × 10⁻¹¹ G. The shaded floor is what the missing gamma-ray halos exclude: a field coherent over more than a megaparsec must exceed 9 × 10⁻¹⁷ G, and the bound rises as the inverse square root of the coherence length below the leptons' cooling length of 0.6 Mpc. The non-helical field ends 3.0 decades below it; the helical one 4.6 decades above it. Above 10⁻⁹ G at a megaparsec the microwave background excludes the field.

A twist that decides where the field ends

A magnetic field made in the first trillionth of a second starts strong and absurdly small, and its turbulence spends the next three hundred thousand years trading strength for size. How far it gets depends on one conserved quantity — how twisted its field lines are — and for a field made at the electroweak transition, that twist is the difference between failing the void bound by three decades and clearing it by five.

cosmology · Primordial fields How a cloud's glow loses its polarisation as it thickens. The polarisation fraction of dust emission against the column density through a cloud, both on logarithmic scales, for four clouds built from cells of 10²¹ hydrogen atoms per square centimetre, each polarising its glow by 20%. A single uniform field with every grain aligned keeps 20% at every column. A field tangled from cell to cell by 40 degrees about a mean direction loses polarisation at first and then levels off at 7.5%, the share its mean direction carries: between 10²² and 10²³ its slope is −0.05. A field with no mean direction at all adds its cells as a pure random walk and falls with a slope of −0.55. Grains that align only in the outer 3 × 10²¹ cm⁻² on each side, where starlight still reaches, contribute nothing from the interior, and the fraction falls with a slope of −1.00.

A falling polarisation and the angle that says why

The glow of dust in a molecular cloud is less polarised the thicker the cloud, almost everywhere it has been measured. Two explanations fit that fall equally well — a magnetic field tangled along the line of sight, or grains in the dark interior that have stopped lining up with it — and between them they can produce any slope a cloud has shown. What separates them is not how much polarisation is lost but whether the direction of what remains wanders.

galaxies · Dust polarisation

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Alfven speedMolecular cloudsCosmic raysDavis chandrasekhar fermiDust polarisationGrain alignmentInterstellar dustRadiative torqueStar formationAccretionAlpha viscosityAmbipolar diffusion

All concepts