Concept

Secular theory — where it appears

The theory of the slow changes in planetary orbits obtained by averaging the mutual perturbations over the orbital periods. It predicts how eccentricities and inclinations exchange over tens of thousands to millions of years, and when the averaging breaks down.

Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The eccentricity the planets force on an asteroid, and where it diverges. The forced eccentricity of a body in the inner Solar System against its semi-major axis, from the linear secular theory with all eight planets — its two giant-planet frequencies set to the measured 4.257 and 28.245 arcseconds a year — on a logarithmic axis: the largest value it reaches over the planetary cycles (solid) and its present value (dashed). Across most of the asteroid belt it is a few hundredths — 0.048 at 2.8 AU — the part of every asteroid's eccentricity that belongs to Jupiter and Saturn rather than to the asteroid. Near 2.04 AU it diverges: there the asteroid's own apsidal precession rate equals the frequency of the planetary mode dominated by Saturn, the denominator A − g₆ vanishes, and the theory's forced eccentricity goes to infinity. That is the ν₆ secular resonance. Real asteroids near it do not reach infinite eccentricity; they reach eccentricities large enough to cross the orbits of Mars and the Earth, and are removed. The location is for a body of low eccentricity and inclination; the full theory curves the resonance to larger distances at higher inclination, which is why the belt's inner edge is not a single number.

A denominator that emptied the inner belt

The eccentricity Jupiter and Saturn force on an asteroid is a fraction, and its denominator is the difference between the asteroid's own precession rate and one of the planets'. At two astronomical units that difference is zero. Where the zero sits depends on where Saturn is — and the belt's quiet orbits say Saturn did not take long to get there.

orbits · Secular theory

Which pairs of planets the angular momentum deficit can bring together. For each adjacent pair of planets, the system's angular momentum deficit divided by the critical deficit at which that pair's orbits could touch, on a logarithmic scale; below one the pair cannot collide under secular evolution, whatever happens. Blue: using only the deficit of the pair's own subsystem — the four terrestrial planets (7.8 × 10⁻⁹ in units of a solar mass times √AU) or the four giants (4.3 × 10⁻⁶). Orange: using the whole Solar System's deficit, which the giants hold almost entirely. On their own budget the inner pairs sit at 0.21, 0.12, 0.34 — safe. On the whole budget they sit at 112, 65, 187. The giants are safe either way, at 0.05, 0.18, 0.36. The terrestrial planets are stable because almost none of the giants' deficit reaches them, not because there is too little of it.

A deficit the giants hold and Mercury could borrow

The angular momentum the planets' orbits lack of circular motion is conserved by every secular interaction, to every order, so it is a budget no planet can overdraw. Compared with what it would take to bring a pair of orbits into contact, it proves without an integration that the terrestrial planets cannot collide among themselves — and shows that they are safe only because the giants, who hold five hundred times as much, lend them almost none. A loan of half a per cent of Jupiter's would be enough to unsettle Mercury.

orbits · Secular theory

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Laplace–Lagrange theory Secular resonance Angular momentum deficit Apsidal precession Asteroid belt Compact planetary systems Eccentricity Forced eccentricity Planet migration Proper elements Small divisor Solar system stability

All concepts