Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Supernova remnant — where it appears

The expanding shell of ejecta and swept-up interstellar material left by an explosion. Its size and expansion rate give an age independent of anything the compact object at its centre says, which is how characteristic ages from pulsar timing are checked.

Named by 3 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Two measured numbers, and everything else on the page derived from them. 25 pulsars in the plane of period against period derivative, at their catalogued values. Only the two axes are measurements; the three families of contour are models. Constant surface field runs at slope −1 because B ∝ √(PṖ), constant characteristic age at slope +1 because τ = P/2Ṗ, and the two families cross the population at right angles — which is why a single dot fixes both. The Crab sits at 3.8·10¹² G and 1257 years, and its true age is 972; the millisecond pulsars at the lower left have fields ten thousand times weaker and characteristic ages of billions of years, because they were spun back up by a companion long after they died. The line at the lower right is the death line, B/P² below which the model says no pair production and therefore no radio emission — and J2144−3933 is drawn below it, an 8.5-second pulsar that is radiating anyway.

A clock that runs down and says what it is

A pulsar hands over two measured numbers, a period and its derivative. Everything else usually quoted about it — an age, a magnetic field, a luminosity — is derived from those two through a model, and the one measurement that tests the model refutes it.

stars · Pulsars Two bodies at a mass ratio of 2.6 to 1. Both bodies orbit their common centre of mass, on similar ellipses whose sizes are in inverse proportion to the masses — here 2.6 to 1, so the heavier body's path is 2.6 times smaller.

The companion survives, and it is moving

When one star of a close pair explodes, the other is left holding an orbital velocity and no orbit. Whether the pair stays bound turns on a single question — did more than half the total mass leave? — and the stars that answer no are running across the Galaxy at a hundred kilometres a second with nothing visible behind them.

stars · Supernovae The anisotropy each slope of escape predicts. The dipole anisotropy of cosmic rays diffusing out of a halo 4 kpc high, 3D/(cH), against energy, for diffusion slopes of ⅓, 0.5, 0.6, each normalised to the boron-to-carbon grammage at 10 GV — so all three agree at low energy and part above it. The shaded box is the range of dipole amplitudes measured between 1 and 100 TeV, a few parts in ten thousand to about a part in a thousand. At 10 TeV the three predict 0.0043, 0.014, 0.027: the slope that would let shocks inject an index of two overshoots the measurement by 27 times, and even Kolmogorov's ⅓ by 4. The normalisation of the prediction is uncertain by a factor of a few, through the arrangement of the sources and the shape of the halo; its rise with energy is not, because it is the same slope that the spectrum and the secondary ratio require.

One slope read twice, and the reading that disagrees

How fast cosmic rays leak out of the Galaxy depends on their energy through a single power, and that power is measured twice: in the falling ratio of boron to carbon, and in how unevenly the particles arrive across the sky. The first reading says one-third. The second, taken at face value, says the leak must be slower still — and neither leaves room for the spectrum shock acceleration predicts.

galaxies · Cosmic rays

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Neutron starAnisotropyBinary starsBraking indexCentre of massCharacteristic ageCosmic raysDeath lineDiffusion coefficientDiffusive shock accelerationEscape velocityGlitch

All concepts