Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Surface brightness — where it appears

Flux per unit solid angle, which is independent of distance in a static space and falls as the fourth power of 1+z in an expanding one. It is what makes a low-surface-brightness galaxy hard to find at any distance, since moving it further away shrinks it without making it fainter per unit area.

Named by 17 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Fringe visibility for a 47 mas disc at 575 nm. Fringe visibility against the separation of the two apertures, for a disc 47 milliarcseconds across seen at 575 nm. The solid curve is a uniform disc, |2J₁(x)/x| with x = πθB/λ; it is exactly one at zero baseline, where both apertures see the same wavefront, and falls to zero at 3.08 m — read off the drawn samples, and equal to 1.21967 λ/θ to better than one part in a million. That is the measurement: not a brightness, a baseline. The dashed curve is the same disc with linear limb darkening u = 0.4, whose null is 4.9% further out at 3.23 m — so the same observed null implies 47 mas as a uniform disc and 49.3 mas limb-darkened, and a diameter quoted without its model is a number without a unit. At the 2.54 m aperture of the telescope this was done on, the visibility is still 0.17: one mirror cannot reach the null, which is the same statement as saying it cannot resolve the star.

An angle of five hundredths of an arcsecond

No telescope has ever resolved a star other than the Sun, and stellar diameters are measured anyway — by finding the separation of two apertures at which the star's interference fringes vanish. What that returns is an angle; the radius arrives only when a distance is brought in, and the distance is the worse-known half.

starlight · Angular diameter What distance does, and does not, do to a galaxy. Three quantities against distance, each relative to its value at 5 Mpc, on logarithmic axes so that a power law is a straight line and its exponent is the slope. Flux falls with slope −2 and angular size with slope −1, both of which are ordinary. Their ratio has slope zero: a galaxy of surface brightness 23.5 magnitudes per square arcsecond has that surface brightness at every distance, and a sky of 22 is brighter than it at every distance too. The contrast against the sky — the quantity that decides whether the thing is detectable at all — is -1.5 magnitudes wherever it is put.

The brightness distance cannot touch

Flux falls as the inverse square of distance and so does solid angle, so their ratio does not fall at all. A galaxy's surface brightness is the same number wherever it is put, which means whole populations can be undetectable at any distance whatever.

galaxies · Surface brightness Every shell contributes the same. Concentric shells of equal thickness around an observer, with stars scattered uniformly in volume. The number of stars in a shell grows as its radius squared and the flux from each falls as the radius squared, so the two cancel exactly and every shell delivers the same total light — the drawn counts are 6, 15, 31, 55, 88, in proportion to r³ − r₀³, and the drawn sizes fall as 1/r. That cancellation is the paradox, and it is why no amount of dust helps: dust absorbs the light and then re-radiates it, and in a universe old enough for the sum to converge it would come to the same temperature as the stars. The sum diverges linearly with radius, so something has to stop it — and the only two candidates are that the shells eventually overlap, or that there are no shells beyond a certain distance because there has not been time for their light to arrive.

Why the sky is dark

In an infinite universe of stars every sight line ends on a stellar surface, so the whole sky should be as bright as the Sun's disc. It is not, and the usual answer — that the expansion redshifts the light away — accounts for a factor of six out of a hundred trillion.

cosmology · Olbers's paradox A halo is born with a spin of a few hundredths. The distribution of the dimensionless spin parameter λ = J|E|^½ ÷ (G M⁵ᐟ²) across dark matter haloes, drawn as a lognormal of median 0.035 and logarithmic width 0.5, with the disc scale length each λ implies printed along the lower axis. The distribution is required to integrate to one and to peak at 0.0272, which is the median times e raised to minus sigma squared, and is the signature of a lognormal rather than of a bell curve drawn to look like one. λ is small because a halo is supported by random motion rather than by rotation: a value of 0.035 means the halo turns at about three and a half per cent of the rate it would need to hold itself up centrifugally. It is also nearly independent of halo mass, which is what points at a common origin. Mapping it to a disc through R_d = λ R₂₀₀/√2 with all of the specific angular momentum retained, a 10¹²-solar-mass halo of radius 206 kiloparsecs gives 5.1 kiloparsecs at the median, against the 2.6 kiloparsecs the Milky Way's disc actually has. The gap is not a failure of the estimate; it is the measurement that the baryons arrived with less spin per unit mass than the halo they arrived in.

A disc the size its halo was born with

A galaxy's mass says how much light it makes. It does not say how big it is. What sets a disc's size is a single dimensionless number describing how fast the dark halo around it happens to be turning — a number the disc had no part in choosing, distributed the same way for every halo mass in the universe.

galaxies · Galaxy spin The darkness, itemised. The extragalactic background light as a spectrum: νIᵥ against wavelength, in nanowatts per square metre per steradian, with wavelength logarithmic. The total under the two humps is not read off a plot — it is the integral (c/4π)∫ε(z)(1+z)⁻¹|dt/dz|dz of the Madau–Dickinson star formation history, taking a continuously star-forming population to radiate 10¹⁰ solar luminosities per solar mass per year, and it comes to 37.5 nW m⁻² sr⁻¹. Half of it was emitted beyond z = 0.91, which is the figure's real content: the dark sky is dominated by light released when the universe was 45 per cent of its present age. The split between the two humps is an assumption rather than a result — 50 per cent of the starlight is taken to be absorbed by dust and re-radiated near 140 µm, and the shapes are lognormals of about the observed widths — but the AREA under each is the computed quantity. Measured, the two come to about 24 and 26: the calculation falls 25 per cent short, and whether the missing light is real or a residual foreground is unsettled.

The darkness has a number in it

The night sky is not black. It carries about sixty nanowatts per square metre per steradian, and that number is the sum of every photon every star has ever emitted, redshifted and added up over thirteen billion years.

cosmology · Olbers's paradox Three messengers, and the three walls they end on. The redshift of the last opaque surface, for the three things that cross the universe, on one logarithmic axis spanning thirty-one decades. Olbers' argument compares how far a sight line runs before it ends on something against how far anything has had time to come — and for starlight the first is 1.7·10¹⁸ Mpc against a horizon of 1.4·10⁴ Mpc, which is why the optical sky is dark. That comparison is not what decides the other two. A relic neutrino's mean free path against ordinary matter works out at 7.7·10³⁷ Mpc — 4·10¹⁹ times starlight's, so on the mean-free-path argument alone the neutrino sky should be darker still. It is not, because the quantity that terminates a sight line is the WALL, and the walls are at z = 1,090, z ≈ 6×10⁹ and nowhere at all. Every neutrino sight line ends on a surface from one second after the beginning; every gravitational-wave sight line runs to the beginning, or to a binary. Both of those skies are saturated — which is what Olbers' argument predicted, and what the optical sky refuses to do. The three are also wildly unequal in brightness: the microwave sky is 996 nW m⁻² sr⁻¹, and the gravitational-wave background at Ω = 10⁻⁹ is 0.018 — a saturated sky five decades fainter than a dark one.

Two skies where the paradox comes out right

Olbers argued that every sight line should end on a source and the sky should blaze. In neutrinos and in gravitational waves it does — the walls are at one second and at no time at all — and both of those skies have now been detected.

cosmology · Olbers's paradox The same count, taken in two places. The ratio of a cluster's luminosity function to the field's, per galaxy at the knee, against absolute magnitude. Both are Schechter functions — the field at a faint-end slope of -1.25 and a characteristic magnitude of -20.9, the cluster at -1.05 and -21.4 — and they are normalised to agree at -21 so that what is drawn is a difference of SHAPE rather than of density, a cluster being some 240 times denser than the field by construction. Two things differ. The cluster's faint end is shallower: at -15 it holds 0.22 of the field's dwarfs per bright galaxy. And its knee is 0.5 magnitudes brighter, which is a factor of 1.6 in luminosity. Neither difference can be read as a cause. A cluster's galaxies are also redder, and the same photometry measures both — so a shallower faint end could mean that dwarfs were destroyed, or that they were never made, or that they are still there and have faded below the survey's limit because their star formation was stopped. The count says the populations differ; it does not say which of a galaxy's life stages the difference happened in.

The same census, taken in two places

Fit a Schechter function to a rich cluster and to the field around it and the two come back with different slopes and different knees. Both differences are real, and neither can be read as a cause — a cluster's galaxies are also redder, and the same photometry measures both.

galaxies · Luminosity function A sky wrong by a thousandth, and the disc that ends or does not. The surface-brightness profile of an exponential disc with a central surface brightness of 21.65 magnitudes per square arcsecond, against radius in units of its scale length, drawn straight — a pure exponential is a straight line in magnitudes — and then as it would be measured after subtracting a sky of 21.5 magnitudes per square arcsecond wrong by +0.1%, −0.1%, +0.3%, −0.3%. A sky left in bends the profile up into a shallower outer part, the shape called an anti-truncation; a sky taken out too hard bends it down into a break and then drops it out of existence where the residual goes negative. The +0.1% error departs by 0.2 magnitudes at 5.2 scale lengths, 27.3 magnitudes per square arcsecond; The −0.1% error departs by 0.2 magnitudes at 5.0 scale lengths, 27.1 magnitudes per square arcsecond; The +0.3% error departs by 0.2 magnitudes at 4.1 scale lengths, 26.1 magnitudes per square arcsecond; The −0.3% error departs by 0.2 magnitudes at 3.9 scale lengths, 25.9 magnitudes per square arcsecond. Real discs are observed to break both ways, at 24 to 27 magnitudes; every one of those breaks lies in the range where a sky error of a few tenths of a per cent would make one.

Where the sky is the measurement

The outskirts of a galaxy at 29 or 30 magnitudes per square arcsecond are a thousand times fainter than the night sky they are seen through. Photon noise averages down with exposure; an error in the sky subtracted from under them does not. A sky wrong by a tenth of a per cent draws a break into a disc that has none, or a halo around a galaxy that has none, and the telescope's own scattered light draws another.

galaxies · Surface brightness The same disc measured smaller at every redshift. The isophotal radius, at a limit of 26.5 magnitudes per square arcsecond, of three exponential discs that do not change at all — central surface brightnesses 20.5, 21.65, 23, the same scale length throughout — against the redshift they are placed at. Surface brightness falls as (1+z)⁴, three magnitudes at z = 1 and six at z = 3, before anything about the galaxy evolves or any band shift is accounted for, so every isophote moves inward. The discs vanish from an isophotal catalogue entirely at z = 2.98, 2.05, 1.24. The dashed line is the half-light radius, 1.68 scale lengths, which is defined by the galaxy's own light and does not move. Galaxies at high redshift are genuinely smaller than their present-day counterparts; how much smaller depends on which of these two kinds of radius is quoted, and the isophotal kind would report a shrinkage for galaxies that have none.

A radius that is a measurement of the threshold

A galaxy has no edge. Its light fades exponentially for as far as anyone can measure, so every size ever quoted for one is the radius at which the fading crossed some line that somebody drew. Drawn at a fixed surface brightness, the line measures how bright the galaxy's centre is as much as how big the galaxy is — and at high redshift it measures the expansion of the universe as well.

galaxies · Surface brightness A colour that predicts an angle. The surface-brightness parameter Fᵥ — a combination of the V magnitude and the angular diameter that depends only on how bright each unit of the star's surface is — against the colour V − K, the ratio of the star's light at 0.55 and 2.2 microns. The line is the relation log θ = 0.5175 + 0.2753 (V − K) − 0.2 V, fitted to interferometric diameters of dwarfs and subgiants: Fᵥ = 3.962 − 0.1376 (V − K). The dots are 40 calibrating stars drawn about it with a 1 per cent scatter in angular diameter, the precision of a good interferometric measurement; refitting them returns a slope of −0.1374 and a scatter of 0.0023 in Fᵥ, which is 1.1 per cent in angle. The dashed curve is what blackbodies of 3,500 to 9,000 K would give, pinned to the Sun: it departs from the stars' line by up to 0.035 over the calibrated range, because real atmospheres have molecular bands and limb darkening a blackbody lacks — which is why the relation is calibrated on measured stars rather than derived. Given a star's V and V − K, the line returns its angular diameter without resolving it.

An angle too small to measure, read from a colour

A giant star in the Large Magellanic Cloud subtends two microarcseconds, a hundred times below anything an interferometer resolves. Its angle is read instead from its colour, through a relation calibrated on nearby stars that can be resolved — and because dust dims a star and reddens it by amounts that nearly cancel in that relation, the distance it gives hardly depends on the dust at all.

starlight · Angular diameter What shares a resolution element with an Earth twin. Light collected in one resolution element around an Earth-like planet in the habitable zone of a Sun-like star, against the system's distance, both on logarithmic scales, for a 6 metre telescope at visible wavelengths, in units of the planet's own light at 10 parsecs. The planet and the leaked starlight both dim as the square of distance. The exozodiacal dust, at 3 times the Solar System's level, and the Solar System's own zodiacal light do not dim at all: each is a surface brightness, and a resolution element at a greater distance simply contains more dust. The exozodi equals the planet at 9.1 parsecs and is 11 times it at 30.

Dust that does not dim with distance

An Earth-like planet around a nearby star is seen against the glow of the dust in its own system, and the two behave differently with distance. The planet is a point, and it fades as the square of how far away it is. The dust is a surface, and a surface does not fade at all — a more distant system packs more dust into each resolution element in exactly the proportion its light is diluted. So the dust around a star, not the telescope's contrast, sets how far away an Earth can be found, and how many stars a search can reach.

exoplanets · Direct imaging A flat sky, and stars that are wrong. The residual brightness after flat-fielding, in per cent, against distance from the field centre, for the sky (flat line) and for a star (curve), with 3 per cent scattered light at the centre of both the flat and the science exposure. The sky, which fills the field as the flat's illumination did, carries the same scattered component and divides out exactly: the corrected image looks perfectly flat, which is the test an observer applies. The star, a point that scatters a negligible fraction of its light into its own aperture, is divided by the scattered component it never had and comes out 2.9 per cent too faint at the centre. The visible check passes and the measurement fails.

Light that adds, corrected as if it multiplied

A flat field is an exposure of something uniform, and some of the light in it did not come through the optics the way starlight does — it scattered off a baffle, a filter face or a dusty window and landed where the geometry never sent it. Dividing by that flat makes the sky in every science image look perfect and makes every star in it wrong, by an amount the image itself cannot show.

starlight · Photometric systems A compact galaxy with a faint envelope, seen at redshift two. The surface-brightness profile of a model galaxy at redshift 2, in magnitudes per square arcsecond against radius in kiloparsecs on a logarithmic axis (solid): a compact de Vaucouleurs core of 1 kpc half-light radius and an exponential envelope of 10 kpc holding 30 per cent of the light, dimmed by 4.77 magnitudes by the expansion. The dotted curve is the core alone. Horizontal lines mark survey limits of 27 and 30 magnitudes per square arcsecond. A single Sérsic profile fitted to what is brighter than each limit (dashed) gives a half-light radius of 1.3 kpc and index 4.6 above 27, and a half-light radius of 1.5 kpc and index 5.1 above 30. The galaxy's true half-light radius, core and envelope together, is 2.1 kpc. The envelope is above the deeper limit out to 16 kpc, and the fit still does not follow it: a single profile weighted towards the bright centre cannot bend to two components, and more depth only nudges the compromise it settles on.

One profile for a galaxy that has two

The worry about the compact galaxies of ten billion years ago was that their growth since might be partly a faint envelope the sky hides. Modelled, the envelope does hide — but not mainly under the sky. A single profile fitted to a core with an envelope reports a compromise at any depth, too large for a tight envelope and too small for a wide one, and the growth it measures is an understatement.

galaxies · Surface brightness Four ways for a galaxy to fade with redshift. The dimming of a galaxy's surface brightness, in magnitudes per square arcsecond, against redshift, for the same galaxy placed at greater and greater distance. In an expanding universe the bolometric surface brightness falls as (1+z)⁴: 3.01 magnitudes by z = 1 and 7.8 by z = 5. Measured per unit frequency, as magnitudes in a filter are, one power is absorbed by the stretching of the band and the dimming is (1+z)³. If photons lost energy on a static journey ("tired light"), only one power would remain — 0.75 magnitudes at z = 1. In a static space with no loss there is no dimming at all, because flux and solid angle both fall as the inverse square of distance. At z = 1 expansion and tired light differ by 2.3 magnitudes, a factor of 8 in brightness.

A dimming short by what young stars repay

In an expanding universe a galaxy's surface brightness should fall as the fourth power of one plus its redshift; if light merely tired on its way through static space, as the first power. Measured on elliptical galaxies at redshift 0.85, it falls as about the two-and-a-half power — neither. The verdict on expansion rests on what the galaxies did in the meantime, and the decisive fact is not the size of the shortfall but its sign: expansion needs the galaxies to have been brighter when their stars were younger, and tired light needs them to have been fainter.

cosmology · Expansion Where a ten-micron zodi comes from. How much each logarithmic interval of radius contributes to the ten-micron glow of a Sun-like star's exozodiacal dust, for blackbody grains in the Solar System's radial profile, seen face-on from 10 pc: with no instrument (dashed) and through a 14.4 m nulling interferometer whose fringes suppress the light near the star (solid, with the averaged transmission dotted). Without the null the glow is concentrated far inside the habitable zone at 1 AU (marked), because the grains' emission at ten microns rises steeply with their temperature: half of it comes from inside 0.34 AU. The null removes the innermost part and pushes the sensitivity outward, but half the nulled signal still comes from inside 0.69 AU, peaking at 0.74. A zodi level measured this way is a measurement of the dust between a few tenths of an AU and the habitable zone, extrapolated to the habitable zone with the Sun's profile.

A zodi measured in heat and needed in light

The dust around nearby stars that will limit the search for Earth-like planets in reflected light has been measured — but in its own glow at ten microns, by an interferometer whose fringes hide the dust nearest the star. Converting that measurement into the visible brightness at the habitable zone needs the dust's radial profile and its grains' albedo and temperature, none of which was measured. The same ten-micron zodi can mean a quarter or ten times the visible dust a coronagraph will see.

exoplanets · Direct imaging A glow that switches off when the shadow climbs past the shell. The brightness that 100,000 objects in orbit add to the zenith sky, as a share of a natural moonless sky of 22 magnitudes per square arcsecond, against how far the Sun is below the horizon, for shells at 550 and 1200 km. Each object reflects sunlight with an effective area of 0.5 square metres; together they spread a glow whose brightness does not depend on the shell's distance, because more objects are in each patch of sky the further away the shell is. At the end of astronomical twilight the two shells add 3.0% and 2.5%. The lower shell's zenith goes dark when the Earth's shadow passes it, at 23 degrees of depression; the higher one at 33.

A glow counted in square metres of sunlit metal

Satellites too faint to see one at a time still reflect sunlight, and spread across the sky they add a glow that no mask removes. Its brightness does not depend on how far away the satellites are, only on how much sunlit area is in orbit and whether the Earth's shadow has reached it. A hundred thousand satellites as bright as today's add a few per cent to the darkest sky — and the estimate that the sky is already a tenth brighter rests on an area of debris nobody has measured.

sky · Twilight A disc that bends up into a halo only the telescope made. The surface brightness of a face-on exponential disc against radius in units of its scale length, in magnitudes per square arcsecond with the centre at 20, as it is (black, a straight line) and as a telescope sees it if 2% or 5% of each point's light is spread into faint wings falling as the inverse square of distance out to ten arcminutes. Scattered light from the bright centre lands in the outskirts, and once the disc has faded below it the profile stops falling and bends up into a shallow component that looks like a stellar halo: the observed profile rises three-quarters of a magnitude above the disc beyond 10.3 and 9.3 scale lengths, near 29.2 magnitudes per square arcsecond. At ten scale lengths the disc itself is at 30.9 and the image at 30.2 and 29.6.

A halo the telescope paints on every galaxy

A telescope puts almost all of a star's light into a dot and a few per cent of it into faint wings that reach arcminutes away. Around a galaxy those wings add up. The scattered light from the bright centre lands in the outskirts, and below about twenty-nine magnitudes per square arcsecond it outshines the galaxy's own — bending the profile up into a halo, or an edge-on disc out into a thick one, at the same depth around every galaxy whatever its size.

starlight · Photometric systems

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Exponential discLow-surface brightness galaxyOlbers's paradoxScattered lightSky backgroundStellar haloZodiacal lightAngular diameterAngular-diameter distanceCoronagraphCosmological dimmingDirect imaging

All concepts