Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Timing model — where it appears

The prediction of a pulsar's pulse arrival times from its spin, its position and motion, its orbit, the interstellar plasma and the observer's own motion. Measured arrivals are compared with it, and what remains is signal or noise.

Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Three ways for a timing model to be wrong, and three shapes that say which. Timing residuals over 6 years for the Crab pulsar, one curve per kind of error in the model, in microseconds. A position error of 1.2 mas leaves a sinusoid of period exactly one year — measured off the drawn curve as 1.000 — with amplitude (a/c)·δθ·cos β = 2.7 μs, because the error is being projected onto a baseline that is the Earth's own orbit and nothing about the pulsar. An unmodelled proper motion of 0.9 mas/yr leaves the same sinusoid with an envelope growing linearly: twice as large at 6 years as at 3. An error of one part in 10⁹ in Ṗ leaves a parabola, the second integral of a frequency drift, whose second derivative is constant to 4e-12 across the span — and that fractional error is deliberately minute, because anything larger produces a residual thousands of times the other two and draws them as flat lines. The shapes do not resemble each other, which is the whole reason a pulsar is an instrument rather than a clock: fitting them simultaneously delivers a position, a proper motion and — from the annual curvature term, not drawn here — a parallax, all from the arrival times of pulses and no image of anything. What is left when every known shape has been removed is the science: glitches, red noise, and the correlated residual between pairs of pulsars that a timing array exists to find.

A clock read against a model of everything in between

A pulsar delivers arrival times and nothing else. Everything else is a model, and what is measured is the difference between the model and the arrivals — a residual whose shape says which term is wrong, and whose annual sinusoid is a position measured from pulses rather than from an image.

stars · Pulsars The stability of a pulsar clock against atomic clocks, over averaging times from a day to thirty years. Fractional frequency instability, on a logarithmic axis, against averaging time from a day to thirty years. A single millisecond pulsar timed to 300 nanoseconds every 14 days improves as τ^(−3/2) while its white timing noise averages down, and flattens where its slow spin noise, drawn at 10⁻¹⁵ at ten years, takes over. An ensemble of 20 such pulsars is 4.5 times better if their noises are independent. The atomic curves are representative: a hydrogen maser, excellent at hours and drifting at years, and a steered atomic time scale limited near 3·10⁻¹⁶ at long times. In this representative comparison the pulsar ensemble becomes the steadier of the two beyond about 3 years of averaging. At a day a pulsar is a billion times worse than an atomic clock; over decades it is competitive, because nothing inside a neutron star changes on the timescales on which laboratory clocks are rebuilt.

A clock made of neutron stars

The best atomic clocks are rebuilt every decade and averaged every month. A millisecond pulsar has kept its own time for a billion years. Averaged over years, an ensemble of pulsars is as steady as the world's atomic time scale — steady enough to find its errors — but it can never say how fast that time scale runs.

sky · Timescales

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Allan deviationBarycentric correctionClock ensembleDispersion measureGlitchGravitational-wave backgroundInternational Atomic TimeMillisecond pulsarProper motionPulsar time scaleA pulsar timing arrayRed noise

All concepts