Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Pulsar time scale — where it appears

A time scale formed by averaging the arrival times of several millisecond pulsars, independent of every atomic clock. It can check atomic time over years but cannot measure its rate, which each pulsar's own spin-down fit absorbs.

Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The stability of a pulsar clock against atomic clocks, over averaging times from a day to thirty years. Fractional frequency instability, on a logarithmic axis, against averaging time from a day to thirty years. A single millisecond pulsar timed to 300 nanoseconds every 14 days improves as τ^(−3/2) while its white timing noise averages down, and flattens where its slow spin noise, drawn at 10⁻¹⁵ at ten years, takes over. An ensemble of 20 such pulsars is 4.5 times better if their noises are independent. The atomic curves are representative: a hydrogen maser, excellent at hours and drifting at years, and a steered atomic time scale limited near 3·10⁻¹⁶ at long times. In this representative comparison the pulsar ensemble becomes the steadier of the two beyond about 3 years of averaging. At a day a pulsar is a billion times worse than an atomic clock; over decades it is competitive, because nothing inside a neutron star changes on the timescales on which laboratory clocks are rebuilt.

A clock made of neutron stars

The best atomic clocks are rebuilt every decade and averaged every month. A millisecond pulsar has kept its own time for a billion years. Averaged over years, an ensemble of pulsars is as steady as the world's atomic time scale — steady enough to find its errors — but it can never say how fast that time scale runs.

sky · Timescales One pulsar's stability, limited by the background every pulsar shares. The cubic-fit stability of a single millisecond pulsar, on logarithmic axes, against averaging time from 0.3 to 40 years. White timing noise of 100 ns every 14 days averages down as τ^(−3/2) (falling dashed line). The gravitational-wave background at the amplitude the timing arrays reported in 2023, A = 2.4·10⁻¹⁵, raises the curve as τ^(2/3) (rising dashed line). Their sum (solid) is lowest at 2.8 years, at 2.8·10⁻¹⁵; averaging longer than that makes this pulsar a worse clock, not a better one, because the background grows faster in the residuals than the white noise shrinks. At ten years the background alone is 5.5·10⁻¹⁵.

A clock whose best interval is three years

A pulsar time scale was expected to improve for as long as anyone kept timing it. The background the timing arrays found in 2023 says otherwise — a single pulsar is steadiest over about three years and worse over every longer interval, and how far an array of them can push that floor down depends less on how many pulsars it holds than on how evenly they cover the sky.

sky · Timescales

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Allan deviationClock ensembleGravitational-wave backgroundMillisecond pulsarHellings downs curveInternational Atomic TimeA pulsar timing arrayRed noiseTerrestrial timeTiming model

All concepts