Astronomy & Celestial Mechanics
the sky, computed
Concept

Zeeman effect — where it appears

The splitting of a spectral line into components of different polarisation by a magnetic field, with a separation proportional to the field strength. Where the splitting is far narrower than the line, the field is recovered instead from the circular polarisation profile, whose shape is fixed to be the derivative of the intensity.

Named by 6 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A 3-gauss field moves the line by 0.33% of its width and is measured anyway. Above: the Fe I 6173 Å line, Landé factor 2.5, at a Doppler width of 0.041 Å. The solid curve is the unmagnetised profile; the dashed curve is the same line in a longitudinal field of 3 gauss, which splits it by 1.3·10⁻⁴ Å — 0.33 per cent of its own width — and is drawn on top of it because the two are not distinguishable. The double-lobed curve underneath them is the Stokes V profile of that same field, magnified 100 times: the two σ components are circularly polarised with opposite handedness, so what is lost in the sum survives in the difference, and the difference of two profiles a hair apart is the derivative of one of them. Below: what that buys. The V amplitude is linear in the field, because it is a first derivative; every signature of the same field in the intensity is quadratic, because a symmetric splitting can only broaden. At a polarimetric precision of 10⁻⁴ the first reaches 0.1 gauss; at a line-width accuracy of 0.001 the second reaches 38, a factor of 420 worse. A quantity far too small to resolve is measured because it is the only thing in the signal that carries a sign — and the same argument run the other way says what polarimetry cannot do: a field of mixed polarity inside the resolution element cancels in V and does not cancel in I, so the 3000-gauss field of a sunspot, which does resolve, is measured the other way round.

A field strength read off a line that will not split

A few hundred gauss splits a spectral line by a ten-thousandth of its own Doppler width, which no spectrograph will ever resolve. The two components are circularly polarised with opposite handedness, so the split survives in the difference of two polarisations — where it is linear in the field rather than quadratic.

starlight · Polarimetry The field a collapse would arrive with, and the one it has. Field strength against hydrogen density, both logarithmic, over the eight decades between diffuse gas and a protostellar core. The steeper line is what perfect flux freezing demands: a sphere collapsing conserves both mass and flux, so B goes as R⁻² while ρ goes as R⁻³, and therefore B goes as the two-thirds power of the density exactly — an exponent with no free parameter in it. The shallower locus is what Zeeman measurements find: a flat branch at about 10 µG up to 300 per cubic centimetre, where the density is rising and the field is not, and a rise as the 0.65 power of the density above it. By the density of a core the two differ by a factor of 1, and a star built at the frozen-flux value would carry a field four orders of magnitude beyond anything measured on one. The flat branch is the important half: it says the gas is moving along field lines without dragging them, which is what gravity does to a cloud that is still magnetically supported, and it locates where the freezing has to break.

A field that would have arrived ten thousand times too strong

A collapsing cloud carries its magnetic field with it, and the arithmetic of that is not negotiable — the field grows as the two-thirds power of the density. Run it from a diffuse cloud to a protostellar core and the answer is four orders of magnitude above anything measured on a young star.

stars · Flux freezing A spot is dark because it is squeezed. Pressure against depth below the quiet photosphere's optical surface, drawn as a ratio to the pressure there. The rising curve is the surrounding gas, which grows exponentially with a 140-kilometre scale height because that is what hydrostatic equilibrium in an ideal gas produces. The flat pair of bands is the spot's own budget: a magnetic pressure of 3.58·10⁵ dyn/cm² from a 3000-gauss field, which is 25 per cent of the total, plus the gas pressure left over. Horizontal balance requires the two columns to reach the same total at the same geometric level, and the level at which they do is 348 kilometres below the quiet surface — so the spot's own optical surface sits in a hollow. Measured Wilson depressions, obtained from the foreshortening of a spot near the limb, are four to six hundred kilometres. Nothing about the darkness was assumed: a field strength read off a Zeeman splitting fixes the magnetic share, the share fixes the depression, and the depression fixes the temperature the deeper layer must have to carry the reduced flux.

The darkness a field pays for

A sunspot is not cool because something is missing. It is cool because a three-thousand-gauss field supplies part of the pressure that holds the column up, the gas therefore supplies less, and the level at which that gas becomes opaque sits some hundreds of kilometres deeper than the surface around it.

stars · Plasma beta Two effects that are blind in opposite directions. The sensitivity of two magnetic diagnostics against field strength, on a logarithmic axis spanning five decades. The Zeeman effect measures the line-of-sight component and adds it up along the path, so a field tangled into 100 independent cells inside one resolution element averages down by a factor of 10 and reports almost nothing — which is exactly the situation in a chromosphere or a turbulent cloud. The Hanle effect is a different device altogether: a field precesses the atom between absorption and re-emission, so a scattering line's polarisation is rotated and reduced, and the amount depends on how far the precession gets in one radiative lifetime. That makes it sensitive around 1 gauss for a 100-nanosecond level, and — the useful part — it does not care about sign, so a tangled field does not cancel. Above the crossing at 27.7 gauss the Hanle signal has saturated and carries no strength information, and the Zeeman effect is the instrument. Neither is a measurement of the field; each is a measurement of what the field did to something else.

Two instruments blind in opposite directions

The Zeeman effect measures the component of a field along the line of sight and adds it up, so a field tangled into a hundred cells reports a tenth of one cell's strength. The Hanle effect measures how far an atom precesses between absorbing and re-emitting, does not care about sign, and saturates just where the Zeeman effect becomes useful.

starlight · Polarimetry One dimensionless number decides whether a cloud may collapse. Field strength against hydrogen column density, with three loci of constant mass-to-flux ratio. The ratio of mass to magnetic flux is conserved under flux freezing, so it cannot be changed by anything that happens during a collapse — which is what makes it a criterion rather than a description. Its critical value is the pure constant 1/(2π√G), and dividing by that gives the dimensionless λ drawn here: below λ = 1 the field can hold the cloud up for ever, however cold it gets, because gravity and the magnetic force scale the same way with radius; above it no field strength suffices. Each locus is a straight line of slope exactly one, because at fixed λ the required field is exactly proportional to the column. Zeeman measurements of dense cores put them a little above the line and their envelopes a little below it, which is the arrangement a slow leak of flux out of the centre would produce and is the observational case for ambipolar diffusion.

A threshold with no free parameter in it

Divide a cloud's mass by the magnetic flux threading it. Gravity and the magnetic force both fall as the inverse square of the radius, so the ratio cannot change during a collapse — and the critical value that separates a cloud which must collapse from one that never can is one over two pi root G, a pure constant.

stars · Star formation The one number a cloud cannot change by squeezing. The mass-to-flux ratio in units of its critical value, against column density, for clouds threaded by fields of 3, 10, 30, 100 microgauss. λ below one is subcritical, and the field alone holds the cloud up, and no amount of compression changes that, because squeezing raises the magnetic and the gravitational energy at the same rate and leaves their ratio exactly where it was. λ above one is supercritical and the field is irrelevant to whether the cloud collapses. Each line has slope exactly one because λ is proportional to the column density at fixed field, and each crosses the boundary at 3.9·10²⁰ cm⁻² for 3 µG, 1.3·10²¹ cm⁻² for 10 µG, 3.9·10²¹ cm⁻² for 30 µG, 1.3·10²² cm⁻² for 100 µG. The Jeans mass is a threshold a cloud can cross by contracting; this one is a label it is born with, and the only way past it is to let the field leak out.

Support that cannot be squeezed away

A cloud held up by pressure can always be defeated by compressing it, because gravity gains faster than heat does. A cloud held up by a magnetic field cannot — squeezing raises both energies at exactly the same rate, so the ratio a cloud is born with is the one it keeps, and the only way out is to let the field leak.

galaxies · Molecular clouds

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Ambipolar diffusionFlux freezingMass-to-flux ratioJeans massMagnetic critical massMolecular cloudsStar formationStokes parametersChromosphereCircular polarisationConvectionCore-collapse

All concepts